Hemodynamic Effect of Left Tilting in Cesarean Delivery

July 5, 2018 updated by: Ahmed Hasanin, Cairo University

Hemodynamic Effect of Three Randomized Angles of Left Tilting After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of different angles of lateral tilt on the maternal hemodynamics before and after subarachnoid block

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Aortocaval compression (ACC) by the gravid uterus is a known physiological phenomenon that is classically claimed to cause supine hypotension in full term pregnant women. ACC has been also mentioned as a possible cause of post-spinal hypotension (PSH) in parturients undergoing cesarean section (CS); however, the evidence for the value of left lateral tilting of parturient in improving hemodynamics is not clear.

The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of different angles of lateral tilt on the maternal hemodynamics before and after subarachnoid block (SAB).

Hemodynamic variables will be taken before SAB in three angles (zero angle, 15 degree angle, and 30 degree angles) of left lateral tilt.

Patients will receive normal SAB after prophylactic vasopressor adminstration (either 15 mg ephedrine or 1.5 mcg/Kg phenylephrine intravenous bolus) then hemodynamic variables will measured again after SAB in the same three angles. The sequence of the tilting angles will be randomized.

Another measure will be taken after delivery of the fetus. SAB will be done in sitting position under complete asepsis using 25 g spinal needle with crystalloid infusion of 500 mL. SAB will be achieved by intrathecal injection of 10 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus 25ug fentanyl. Success of SAB will be tested within five minutes after drug injection. SAB will be considered successful if adequate block reached T4 dermatome.

Cardiac output and stroke volume will be measured using electrical cardiometry device.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
61

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • full term parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 35 Kg/m2, polyhydramnios, history of impaired cardiac contractility, valvular heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, hypertensive pregnancy disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: left lateral tilting arm
all patients will be put in three angles of left lateral tilt in randomized order (supine position - left lateral tilting in 15 degrees - and left lateral tilting in 30 degrees) and the hemodynamic data will be compared in the three angles.
Other: left lateral tilting in 15 degrees
The mother will be placed in left lateral tilted position (15 degrees) using a standard wedge
Other: left lateral tilting in 30 degrees
The mother will be placed in left lateral tilted position (30 degrees) using a standard wedge
Other: supine position
The mother will be placed in standard supine position

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac output
Time Frame: 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
Cardiac output in liters per minute measured by electrical cardiometry
30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cardiac output
Time Frame: before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
Cardiac output in liters per minute measured by electrical cardiometry
before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
mean arterial blood pressure measured by non-invasive monitor
before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
mean arterial blood pressure measured by non-invasive monitor
30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
stroke volume
Time Frame: before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
stroke volume in milliliters measured by electrical cardiometry
before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
stroke volume
Time Frame: 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
stroke volume in milliliters measured by electrical cardiometry
30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
systemic vascular resistance
Time Frame: before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
measured in mmHg × min / mL by electrical cardiometry
before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
systemic vascular resistance
Time Frame: 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
measured in mmHg × min / mL by electrical cardiometry
30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
heart rate
Time Frame: before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
measured in beat per minute
before spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
heart rate
Time Frame: 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting
measured in beat per minute
30 minutes after spinal anesthesia in different angles of left lateral tilting

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 25, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N-36-2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Complications

Clinical Trials on left lateral tilting in 15 degrees

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings