Lung Volume Recruitment Combined With Expiratory Muscle Strength Training in ALS

February 22, 2023 updated by: University of Minnesota

A Pilot Study of Lung Volume Recruitment Combined With Expiratory Muscle Strength Training in ALS

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of two treatment techniques called Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST) and Lung Volume Recruitment (LVR) on breathing, swallowing, speech, and cough function in persons with mild to moderate ALS. Half of the participants will do EMST alone, and the other half of the participants will do EMST and LVR.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
23

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • University of Florida
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ALS defined as possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite by El Escorial criteria
  • Reduced Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP) compared to norms for age and sex
  • Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) > 65% predicted

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Relative contraindications to LVR, including known pneumothorax, active internal bleeding, unstable hypertension, unstable angina, emphysema, recent barotrauma, or FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume, trial 1)/FVC ratio < 0.7.
  • Use of EMST or breath stacking > 3 days/week within 12 weeks of screening
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Cognitive Behavioral Scale (ALS-CBS) score predictive of dementia (≤ 10)
  • Participation in another clinical trial of an intervention in ALS within 30 days of study enrollment or during study enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Expiratory Muscle Strength Testing (EMST)
EMST is a treatment method that has been used to improve cough function and swallowing in ALS. EMST uses a training device that has a valve set to 50% of a patient's maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). The patient exhales forcefully until the valve releases. Patients perform 5 sets of 5 repetitions a day, 5 days a week.
Procedure: Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST)
EMST uses a training device that has a valve set to 50% of a patient's maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). The patient exhales forcefully until the valve releases. Patients perform 5 sets of 5 repetitions a day, 5 days a week.
Active Comparator: EMST + Lung Volume Recruitment (LVR)

EMST is a treatment method that has been used to improve cough function and swallowing in ALS. EMST uses a training device that has a valve set to 50% of a patient's maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). The patient exhales forcefully until the valve releases. Patients perform 5 sets of 5 repetitions a day, 5 days a week.

LVR is a technique to increase cough function that is performed with a resuscitation bag fitted with a mouthpiece and a one-way valve. The bag is used to expand the lungs, after which the patient makes a voluntary cough.
Procedure: EMST + Lung Volume Recruitment (LVR)

EMST uses a training device that has a valve set to 50% of a patient's maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). The patient exhales forcefully until the valve releases. Patients perform 5 sets of 5 repetitions a day, 5 days a week.

LVR is a technique to increase cough function that is performed with a resuscitation bag fitted with a mouthpiece and a one-way valve. The bag is used to expand the lungs, after which the patient makes a voluntary cough. Half of the participants will perform the LVR technique in addition to the ESMT technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Cough Flow
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 6, and Week 12
Ventilatory measure that assesses the change in coughing ability at Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)
Baseline (Week 0), Week 6, and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal Expiratory Pressure
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, and Week 12
Measurement of respiratory muscle strength changes at Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), Week 8, Week 10, and End of Study (Week 12)
Week 0, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, and Week 12
Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 6, and Week 12
Measurement of changes in how much air is exhaled over a series of forced breaths at Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)
Baseline (Week 0), Week 6, and Week 12
Eating Assessment Tool - 10 (EAT-10)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 6, and Week 12
10-item patient reported outcome assessing changes in swallowing function at Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)
Baseline (Week 0), Week 6, and Week 12
Swallowing Related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)
44-item patient reported outcome assessing changes in swallowing impairment at Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)
Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)
Speech Intelligibility Test (SIT)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)
Standardized assessment of speech intelligibility and efficiency in neuromuscular disorders. Measures changes in speech intelligibility at Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12).
Baseline (Week 0), Randomization (Week 6), and End of Study (Week 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Minnesota

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Walk, MD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NEUR-2017-25778

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings