Copeptin and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

February 9, 2021 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
Copeptin, a surrogate marker for vasopressin, has been found to be elevated in metabolic disorders including obesity and diabetes, which are disorders both associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and therefore suggest a potential role for vasopressin in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. The investigators intend to investigate if there is an association of vasopressin with the presence and severity of NAFLD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Participants: As a pilot study, the investigators will recruit 30 obese adults with NAFLD based upon ultrasound echogenicity within 6 months of enrollment, and 30 obese adults without NAFLD based upon ultrasound (US) echogenicity for comparison.

Screening Visit/Study Visit: Patients in the investigator's Obesity clinic will be approached about the study and consented if interested at the screening. Participants will have a chart review for their history and physical Exam and medication review for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Qualified participants will be invited for a screening visit to be scheduled in conjunction with the labs and procedures performed as Standard of Care (SOC) in the obesity clinic. At the screening visit, following consent, participants will have vitals (blood pressure, Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference) and a physical examination performed. Participants' Standard of Care (SOC) labs including fasting lipid panel, HbA1c (unless done within last 3 months), comprehensive metabolic panel, titers for hepatitis b and c, and complete blood count will be drawn, along with the following research labs: insulin, glucagon, free fatty acids, adiponectin and a 24-hour urine cortisol collection. Those who have not had an abdominal US will have a SOC US performed to delineate non-NAFLD or NAFLD status. US will not be performed if already done within 6 months of enrollment. All ultrasound studies will be interpreted by one University of Colorado Denver radiologist to categorize the patient as NAFLD or non-NAFLD to limit inter-reader variability. Those with NAFLD present on US will also have a SOC Fibroscan done to assess severity of steatosis (based upon Controlled Attenuation Parameter or CAP Score) and fibrosis (based upon elastography). Given limitations of ultrasound to accurately detect significant steatosis unless >30%, the investigators will in addition perform Fibroscan (all particpants regardless of US) to assess steatosis, so as to confirm if significant steatosis and compare copeptin levels on a continuum of level of steatosis as part of research procedure. Fibroscan can detect steatosis (based upon Controlled Attenuation Parameter or CAP Score) and fibrosis (based upon elastography). FIbroscan with M probe has been found to have AUROC 0.823 for a cutoff of value of 248 dB/m for no steatosis vs steatosis (with other cutoffs at 268 dB/m between S1 and S2-S3 and 280 dB/m between S1-S2 and S3 disease).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Recruiting
        • University of Colorado
        • Contact:
          • Thomas Jensen, MD
          • Phone Number: 720-848-2650
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. Obese adults (BMI 30-40 kg/m2) age 30-75 years with NAFLD based upon ultrasound echogenicity within 6 months of enrollment
  2. Obese adults (BMI 30-40 kg/m2) age 30-75 years without NAFLD based upon ultrasound echogenicity within 6 months of enrollment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients age 30-75
  2. BMI 30-40
  3. Presence of fatty liver on ultrasound

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diabetes mellitus (determined by prior HbA1c, fasting glucose, and/or random glucose in the last three months according to ADA criteria),
  2. Medication known to affect insulin sensitivity e.g. metformin, thiazolidinediones, systemic steroids, atypical antipsychotics),
  3. Fibrates,
  4. eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m2 by MDRD equation(11),
  5. Pregnancy,
  6. Breast feeding,
  7. Sodium <135 mEq/L,
  8. Diabetes insipidus,
  9. Liver disease other than NAFLD (including obstructive liver disease),
  10. ALT or AST>60 IU/L,
  11. Hepatic steatosis on ultrasound for the non-NAFLD group,
  12. Congestive heart failure,
  13. Patients who consume >20g of ETOH a day,
  14. Patients found to have Cushing's disease based upon 24 hour urine results (Urine Free cortisol >2x upper limit of normal).
  15. Patient's with pacemakers
  16. Off of Coenzyme Q for 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Obese with NAFLD
Patients who have NAFLD based upon ultrasound
Obese without NAFLD
Patients who do not have NAFLD based upon ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparision of Copeptin with and without NAFLD
Time Frame: Within 6 months of documented NAFLD or non-NAFLD and within 1 week of fibroscan
The investigators will compare level of copeptin with the measurement of NAFLD based upon ultrasound and fibroscan.
Within 6 months of documented NAFLD or non-NAFLD and within 1 week of fibroscan
Copeptin and level of steatosis
Time Frame: Within one week of fibroscan being perfomed
Comparison of CAP score of fibroscan to copeptin levels
Within one week of fibroscan being perfomed
Copeptin and Liver Elastography
Time Frame: Within one week of fibroscan being perfomed
Compare Copeptin to liver elastography (kPa)
Within one week of fibroscan being perfomed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Insulin Resistance and copeptin
Time Frame: Same day as these labs after 8 hour fast from food and water.
Changes in insulin, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, adiponectin estimated Insulin Compared to copeptin level
Same day as these labs after 8 hour fast from food and water.
Copeptin and Lipids
Time Frame: Same day as these labs after 8 hour fast from food and water.
Compare copeptin level to cholesterol and free fatty acids
Same day as these labs after 8 hour fast from food and water.
Copeptin and Liver enzymes
Time Frame: Same day as these labs after 8 hour fast from food and water.
Compare copeptin and liver enzymes
Same day as these labs after 8 hour fast from food and water.
Copeptin and Weight
Time Frame: Within 1 month of screening visit
Compare Copeptin with BMI
Within 1 month of screening visit
Copeptin and Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Within 1 month of screening visit
Compare copeptin with weight circumference
Within 1 month of screening visit
Copeptin and Blood pressure
Time Frame: Within 1 month of screening visit
Compare copetin with measurements of blood pressure
Within 1 month of screening visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Colorado, Denver

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Jensen, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17-1160

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NAFLD

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings