The Efficacy of Front-of-package Labelling Schemes: an Experimental Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S3E2
- University of Toronto
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- speak English as a primary language
- reside in Canada excluding the Northern Territories
- are 18 years or over
- provide informed consent
- do at least some of the household grocery shopping
- own a smartphone (version iPhone 3 or later or Android)
- are able to complete the survey on a minimum screen size of 9.7 inches.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Traffic Light
Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages with traffic light front of pack labels only. Intervention is the Nutrition Rating System - Traffic Light |
Behavioural: Nutrition Rating Systems (shown on the online survey and the mobile app) provide consumers with an interpretation of the healthfulness of a food or beverage, by indicating the levels (low=green, moderate=amber, high=red) of sodium, saturated fat and sugar in a product based on modified Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) criteria.
This is embedded within each condition to inform and educate consumers about the labelling condition/intervention to which they are randomized.
All participants are assigned to an app task to view 20 products and see the 'rating' these products would get according to their condition.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Star System
Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages with health star rating front of pack labels only. Intervention is the Nutrition Rating System - Health Star Rating |
This is embedded within each condition to inform and educate consumers about the labelling condition/intervention to which they are randomized.
All participants are assigned to an app task to view 20 products and see the 'rating' these products would get according to their condition.
Behavioural: Nutrition Rating Systems (shown on the online survey and the mobile app) provide consumers with an interpretation of the healthfulness of a food or beverage product by indicating the number of stars awarded to a product, from 0.5 to 5 stars, based on modified Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) nutrient profiling criteria.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Warning Label
Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages with warning front of pack labels only. Intervention is the Nutrition Rating System - Warning Labels |
This is embedded within each condition to inform and educate consumers about the labelling condition/intervention to which they are randomized.
All participants are assigned to an app task to view 20 products and see the 'rating' these products would get according to their condition.
Behavioural: Nutrition Rating Systems (shown on the online survey and the mobile app) provide consumers with an interpretation of the healthfulness of a food or beverage product by indicating with a warning label products that are "high" in sodium, saturated fat and sugar, based on a percent daily value (%DV) greater than 15% for individual products and 30% for combination dishes.
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages without any front of pack labels.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comprehension task - ability to identify healthy products (survey measure)
Time Frame: 1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
The participant's ability to identify the most healthy product in a group of 5 products in a task rating 5 products with varying levels of 'healthiness' according to modified FSANZ criteria.
Question wording: Please rank these products in terms of healthiness where 1 is the"most healthy" and 5 is the "least healthy" cereal
|
1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
|
Comprehension task - ability to identify unhealthy products (survey measure)
Time Frame: 1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
The participant's ability to identify the least healthy product in a group of products in a group of 5 products in a task rating 5 products with varying levels of 'healthiness' according to modified FSANZ criteria.
Question wording: Please rank these products in terms of healthiness where 1 is the"most healthy" and 5 is the "least healthy" cereal
|
1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comprehension task - ability to identify the overall 'healthiness' of a product (survey measure - Likert scale)
Time Frame: 1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
The participant's ability to accurately rate a product as more or less healthy according to the type and amount of nutritional information on the product, using a 7 point Likert scale.
Question wording: How healthy is this (product) for you?
|
1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
|
Hypothetical purchasing of products (survey measure - Likert scale)
Time Frame: 1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
The participant's perceived likelihood of purchasing a product according to the type and amount of nutritional information on the product, using a 7 point Likert scale. Question wording: Assume this product has a cost similar to other (product category). If you were shopping for (product), how likely would you be to purchase this one? |
1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Vanderlee L, Franco-Arellano B, Ahmed M, Oh A, Lou W, L'Abbe MR. The efficacy of 'high in' warning labels, health star and traffic light front-of-package labelling: an online randomised control trial. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jan;24(1):62-74. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003213. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
- Ahmed M, Oh A, Vanderlee L, Franco-Arellano B, Schermel A, Lou W, L'Abbe MR. A randomized controlled trial examining consumers' perceptions and opinions on using different versions of a FoodFlip(c) smartphone application for delivery of nutrition information. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 12;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0923-1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 34393
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases
-
NCT07483502Not yet recruitingCardiovascular Surgery | Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
-
NCT07067398RecruitingCardiovascular | Cardiovascular Health | Cardiovascular (CV) Risk | Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Factors
-
NCT07497932RecruitingCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Surgery
-
NCT04121741CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiovascular Risk Factor | Cardiovascular Health
-
NCT03717363CompletedCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Risk Factor
-
NCT06832644RecruitingCardiovascular Risk | Genetic Cardiovascular Risk
-
NCT00983333CompletedCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Risk Factors
-
NCT02038101Unknown
-
NCT02777515Terminated
-
NCT07478354RecruitingCardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
Clinical Trials on Nutrition Rating System - Traffic Light
-
NCT03134794CompletedMultiple Sclerosis
-
NCT03761342CompletedDiet Modification | Food Preferences | Diet Habit | Food Selection | Nutrition Poor
-
NCT04308408Completed
-
NCT02814604CompletedDiet, Food, and Nutrition | Consumer Behavior
-
NCT06516627CompletedDietary Habits | Food Preferences | Healthy Diet | Food Selection | Nutrition
-
NCT01990508Completed
-
NCT06877117Enrolling by invitationBehaviour Change | Nudging | Rectangular Colllimation in Pediatric Dentistry
-
NCT07570576Not yet recruitingObesity & Overweight