Comparison of Volumes of Local Anesthetics on the Efficiency and Safety of Stellate Ganglion Block for CRPS of the Arm

February 21, 2020 updated by: Veronique Brulotte, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Comparison of Two Volumes of Local Anesthetics on the Efficiency and Safety of Stellate Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome of the Arm

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety of 2ml versus 5ml of local anesthetics used in stellate ganglion blocks for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome of the arm.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To evaluate if 2ml of 0.2% ropivacaine is less effective in decreasing pain scores by more than 50% when compared to 5ml of 0.2% ropivacaine. To evaluate if 2ml of 0.2% ropivacaine is causes less side effects when compared to 5ml after a stellate ganglion block.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome of the arm according to the Budapest criteria and having already received a minimum of 3 stellate ganglion blocks. Only patients having received a minimum of 3 stellate ganglion blocks will be included since it is expected to have a progressive and sustained decrease in pain scores during the first 3 blocks.
  • ASA 1 to 3 included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Contra-indications to the stellate ganglion block procedure such as coagulopathy, anticoagulants or anti platelet therapy other than aspirin, systemic or injection site infection, important neck deformity (post-radiotherapy or surgery, etc.), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contralateral diaphragm paralysis or contralateral pneumonectomy
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Concomitant pain syndrome other than complex regional pain syndrome of the arm
  • Liver or kidney failure (CrCl < 30 ml/min)
  • Inability to understand à verbal numeric pain score scale after careful explanations
  • Inability to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group 5
stellate ganglion block with ropivacaine 0.2% 5 mL
Procedure: stellate ganglion block with ropivacaine 0.2% 5 mL
Each patient will undergo two stellate ganglion blocks and receive both volumes of local anesthetics in random order. The stellate ganglion blocks will be separated by 3 weeks in order to assure that no residual effects from the previous block will influence the results.
Active Comparator: Group 2
stellate ganglion block wit ropivacaine 0.2% 2 mL
Procedure: stellate ganglion block wit ropivacaine 0.2% 2 mL
Each patient will undergo two stellate ganglion blocks and receive both volumes of local anesthetics in random order. The stellate ganglion blocks will be separated by 3 weeks in order to assure that no residual effects from the previous block will influence the results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: 24 hours after the stellate ganglion block
Evaluate the efficiency of stellate ganglion block in decreasing pain scores 24 hours after the procedure using a verbal numeric pain rating scale.
24 hours after the stellate ganglion block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: 7 days after the stellate ganglion block
Evaluate the efficiency of stellate ganglion block in decreasing pain scores 7 days after the procedure using a verbal numeric pain rating scale.
7 days after the stellate ganglion block
Pain score
Time Frame: 14 days after the stellate ganglion block
Evaluate the efficiency of stellate ganglion block in decreasing pain scores 14 days after the procedure using a verbal numeric pain rating scale.
14 days after the stellate ganglion block
Temperature increase in the ipsilateral arm
Time Frame: 1 hour after the procedure
Evaluate the efficiency of stellate ganglion block on the increase in temperature of the ipsilateral arm using an infrared thermometer. The cutaneous temperature will be measured in order to determine the proportion of patients in each group reaching an increase of >1.5 C in the ipsilateral arm.
1 hour after the procedure
Horner Syndrome
Time Frame: 1 hour after the procedure
Evaluate the efficiency of stellate ganglion block to produce an ipsilateral Horner Syndrome as defined by a ptosis and miosis. Evaluate the proportion of patients in each group presenting an ipsilateral Horner syndrome.
1 hour after the procedure
Occurrence of dysphagia after a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: 1 hour after the procedure
Patients describing having dysphagia after the stellate ganglion block
1 hour after the procedure
Occurrence of hoarseness after a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: 1 hour after the procedure
patients describing having hoarseness after a stellate ganglion block
1 hour after the procedure
Occurrence of foreign body sensation after a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: 1h after the procedure
patients describing having a foreign body sensation after the stellate ganglion block
1h after the procedure
Occurrence of dyspnea after a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: 1h after the procedure
patients describing having dyspnea after a stellate ganglion block
1h after the procedure
Occurrence of ipsilateral arm weakness after a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: 1h after the procedure
patients describing having ipsilateral arm weakness after a stellate ganglion block
1h after the procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of seizure during a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: within 30 minutes of performing the stellate ganglion block
patient having seizure
within 30 minutes of performing the stellate ganglion block
Occurrence of hematoma after a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: During the first 7 days after the procedure
physician or patient identifying a neck hematoma
During the first 7 days after the procedure
Occurrence of pneumothorax after a stellate ganglion block
Time Frame: During the first 7 days after the procedure
physician diagnosing a pneumothorax
During the first 7 days after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: veronique Brulotte, MD, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 21, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Maisonneuve RH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Clinical Trials on stellate ganglion block with ropivacaine 0.2% 5 mL

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings