Influence of 3D- vs. 4K-display System on Surgical Performance (IDOSP)

February 29, 2020 updated by: Roger Wahba, MD, PhD, Universitätsklinikum Köln

3D- vs. 4K-display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique on Surgical Performance

Modern display technique seems to optimize visualization in minimal-invasive surgery. Many systems are available right now with a fundamental difference between the passive polarizing 3-dimensional (3D) and 2-dimensional (2D) technique. Data seems to show a benefit for the 3D technique in the visualization of the operative field. This could lead to more precision in minimal-invasive surgery. 2D-systems with high resolution of 4.096 x 2.180 pixels (4K) could be a promising alternative. This study wants to evaluate if 3D- or 4K- display technique could optimize surgeons´ view and improve the performance during minimal-invasive surgery. Therefore medical students and surgeons of different experience levels will perform surgical tasks on a minimal-invasive training system.They will be randomized to use first the 3D- or the 4K-display system in the training set-up. After completing the tasks with one system the minimal-invasive training set-up will be repeated with the other display system. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) task load index is evaluated after each round. The ability for stereoscopic vision is tested after finishing the complete training set-up with both systems. The primary outcome parameter surgical performance will be evaluated in this study defined as the performance time and the number of defined mistakes made during each task.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

133

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cologne, Germany, 50931
        • University of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • medical student
  • medical doctor
  • informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known deficit of stereoscopic view
  • experience with the tasks of the minimal-invasive training set-up
  • not able to use both hands for minimal-invasive training set-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 3D-display system
Subjects in this arm will perform the tasks on the minimal-invasive training set-up first with the 3D-display system. Then they will do the NASA task load index questionnaire. After that they will perform the tasks with the 4 K-display system. After that again a NASA Task load index questionnaire is performed.
The subjects will perform tasks on a minimal-invasive/laparoscopic training set-up. They will perform the tasks with a 3D-display system or a 4K-display system. The intervention type 3D-display system means that the training-set up is performed first with 3D-display system an after that with the 4K-display system.
EXPERIMENTAL: 4K-display system
Subjects in this arm will perform the tasks on the minimal-invasive training set-up first with the 4K-display system. Then they will do the NASA task load index questionnaire. After that they will perform the tasks with the 3D-display system. After that again a NASA Task load index questionnaire is performed.
The subjects will perform tasks on a minimal-invasive/laparoscopic training set-up. They will perform the tasks with a 3D-display system or a 4K-display system. The intervention type 4K-display system means that the training-set up is performed first with 4K-display system and after that with the 3D-display system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Performance Time
Time Frame: immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1
The surgical performance time is defined as time needed to complete the tasks at the minimal-invasive trainer. the time is measured in seconds
immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1
Surgical Performance Errors
Time Frame: immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1
it is measured once directly after completing the task with the 3D performance time and the number of errors: the surgical performance errors are defined as the number of defined errors made during the performance of the tasks at the minimal invasive trainer surgical performance errors = number of errors
immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Task Load
Time Frame: immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1
task load felt by the subjects evaluated by NASA task load index, after tasks with 3 D- and 4 K- systems are completed NASA task load index is evaluated once
immediately after tasks are performed, Day 1
Learning curve
Time Frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Learning curve after the completeness of the tasks
immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Stereoscopic view Bagolini
Time Frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Qualitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units : positive /negative/diplopia
immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Stereoscopic view Lang I/II
Time Frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Semi-quantitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units : arc seconds
immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Stereoscopic view Titmus
Time Frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Semi-quantitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units : arc seconds (fly at 3550 arc seconds, animals at 400, 200, 100 arc seconds,rings at 800, 400, 200, 140, 100, 80, 60, 50, 40 arc seconds)
immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Stereoscopic view TNO
Time Frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Semi-quantitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units: arc seconds (480, 240, 120, 60, 30, 15)
immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
Stereoscopic view Cover
Time Frame: immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1
qualitative test for assesment of stereoscopic view units: phoria/tropia
immediately after tasks with both systems (3D and 4K) are performed, Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roger Wahba, MD, PHD, Universitätsklinikum Köln

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-388

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Performance

Clinical Trials on 3D-display system

Search Similar Trials