Reducing Rural Colon Cancer Disparities

March 29, 2021 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Reducing Rural Colon Cancer Disparities Through Multi-level Interventions in Follow-up After Abnormal Screening Tests

The investigators will conduct pre-implementations assessments of primary care clinics within a rural health system to determine current practices and capacities regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and follow-up, preferred evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to improve follow-up, and factors that could influence successful implementation and eventual impact of a multi-level intervention to increase timely and complete follow-up after positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in rural patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
431

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Carbondale, Illinois, United States, 62901
        • Southern Illinois Healthcare
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Primary Care Providers/Staff Participants, Patient Participants, and Colonoscopy Provider/Staff Participants from Southern Illinois Healthcare.

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Primary Care Provider/Staff Participants -Eligible providers and staff include physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, case managers, medical assistants, administrative staff, or other employees of the clinic involved in the cancer screening and follow-up process.

Inclusion Criteria for Patient Participants (Interview)

-Positive FOBT or colonoscopy

Inclusion Criteria for Patient Participants (Survey)

  • 50 years of age or older
  • Had a colonoscopy at one of Southern Illinois Healthcare's facilities within the last 24 months

Inclusion Criteria for Colonoscopy Provider/Staff Participants -Provider and a staff or mid-level provider in each office (5 colonoscopy providers in the Southern Illinois Healthcare region)

Exclusion Criteria for Primary Care Provider/Staff Participants

-None

Exclusion Criteria for Patient Participants (Interview)

  • Negative FOBT or colonoscopy
  • Exclusion Criteria for Patient Participants (Survey)
  • Younger than 50 years of age

Exclusion Criteria for Colonoscopy Provider/Staff Participants None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Primary Care Provider/Staff Participants Interviews
  • Up to two primary care providers and at least one staff person at each of the 16 clinics, with approximately 5 interviewees per clinic. Eligible providers and staff include physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, case managers, medical assistants, administrative staff, or other employees of the clinic involved in the cancer screening and follow-up process.
  • If the participant verbally consents, the research team member will conduct an interview with the provider to learn about the current processes used to support and monitor colorectal cancer screening (CRC) from screening initiation through follow-up; assess capacity and interest in implementing Evidence Based Practices for supporting and monitoring CRC screening, including any ideas interviewees have or find appealing; and engage the organizations as partners to build interest, capacity, and infrastructure for future intervention trial and other future studies.
Other: Primary Care Provider/Staff Participants Interview
-Approximately a 30 minute interview
Patient Participants Interviews
  • 10 patients across 5 clinics will be recruited for interviews, which will address the patient experience with screening and follow-up.
  • If the participant verbally consents, the research team member will conduct an interview with the patient participant to gain a deeper understanding of the CRC screening process from the patient's perspective; the gaps, challenges, or road blocks/speed bumps to completing CRC screening steps; and what organizations can do better or differently to help people complete the CRC screening process.
Other: Patient Participant Interview
-Approximately 45-60 minute interview
Patient Participants Anonymous Survey
-Patient participants will be recruited to take an anonymous mailed survey, which will address patient level barriers to screening and follow-up focusing on out of pocket costs.
Other: Patient Participant Anonymous Survey
-Survey completion will take approximately 15 minutes
Colonoscopy Provider/Staff Participants Interviews
  • Colonoscopy providers and a staff or mid-level provider in each office will be recruited for interviews.
  • If the participant consents, the research team member will conduct an interview to learn about current processes used to support and monitor colorectal cancer screening from the perspective of gastroenterology/colonoscopy sites and to learn about how gastroenterology/colonoscopy sites communicate and coordinate care with other healthcare organizations and patients to support and monitor colorectal cancer screening.
Other: Colonoscopy Provider/Staff Participants Interviews
-Approximately a 30 minute interview

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine current practice and capacity regarding screening and follow-up of colorectal cancer screening at rural health clinics
Time Frame: Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)
-This will be measured by interviews
Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)
Assess factors that could influence implementation of multi-level EBIs
Time Frame: Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)
-This will be measured by interviews
Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)
Evaluate the capacity for colonoscopy and diagnostic follow-up by identifying those clinics/practitioners who deliver colonoscopy
Time Frame: Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)
-This will be measured by interviews
Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)
Assess the care coordination and communication with primary care providers by colonoscopy clinics/practitioners
Time Frame: Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)
-This will be measured by interviews
Through completion of study (estimated to be 18 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 8, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 18, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201704046
  • U01CA209861-01A1 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colon Cancer

Clinical Trials on Primary Care Provider/Staff Participants Interview

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings