Pediatric Intubation During Emergency Conditions
A Comparison of Direct vs. Video-laryngoscopes for Different Emergency Pediatric Airway Scenarios
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Masovian
-
Warsaw, Masovian, Poland, 02-662
- Lazarsku University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- paramedics
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- none experience in videolaryngoscopy
- less than 1 year experience in medicine
Exclusion Criteria:
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Normal airway scenario
intubation in normal airway scenario
|
intubation will be performed using standard direct laryngoscopy - Macintosh laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using Miller laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using McGrath MAC EMS video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using GlideScope video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Tongue edema scenario
intubation in the tongue edema scenario.
Tongue edema was obtain using simulator indicators
|
intubation will be performed using standard direct laryngoscopy - Macintosh laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using Miller laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using McGrath MAC EMS video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using GlideScope video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Spinal immobilization with normal airway scenario
intubation in spinal immobilization with normal airway scenario
|
intubation will be performed using standard direct laryngoscopy - Macintosh laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using Miller laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using McGrath MAC EMS video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using GlideScope video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Spinal immobilization with tongue edema scenario
endotracheal intubation with immobilized cervical spine and tongue edema scenario
|
intubation will be performed using standard direct laryngoscopy - Macintosh laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using Miller laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using McGrath MAC EMS video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
intubation will be performed using GlideScope video - laryngoscope
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intubation time
Time Frame: 1 day
|
time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ease of use
Time Frame: 1 day
|
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization.
A 100% score is a extremely difficult procedure.
A Ease of use score of 1% means that procedure is extremely easy
|
1 day
|
|
Success of intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
|
If the oesopharyngeal tube was incorrectly placed or intubation lasted longer than 60 seconds, the airway-management attempt was defined as a failure.
|
1 day
|
|
Cormack-Lehane grading
Time Frame: 1 day
|
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading, scale developed by Cormack and Lehane, based on four degrees of visibility of the glottis.
|
1 day
|
|
POGO score - percentage of glottic opening
Time Frame: 1 day
|
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization.
A 100% POGO score is a full view of the glottis from the anterior commissure to the interarytenoid notch.
A POGO score of 0 means that even the interarytenoid notch is not seen.
|
1 day
|
|
Preferred ETI device
Time Frame: 1 day
|
participants were asked which method of ETI they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Szarpak L, Karczewska K, Czyzewski L, Truszewski Z, Kurowski A. Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Nov;33(11):735-739. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000741.
- Madziala M, Smereka J, Dabrowski M, Leung S, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. A comparison of McGrath MAC(R) and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun;176(6):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2909-9. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
- Szarpak L, Kurowski A, Czyzewski L, Rodriguez-Nunez A. Video rigid flexing laryngoscope (RIFL) vs Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during pediatric resuscitation by paramedics: a simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.054. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ETI_2018_PALS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Intubation
-
NCT02158247CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Individualized Depth of Endotracheal Intubation
-
NCT07507032CompletedEndotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope for General Anesthesia | Endotracheal Intubation Risk Assessment
-
NCT06232837CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or Failed
-
NCT05228288Completed
-
NCT06089187Completed
-
NCT05143606CompletedIntubation, Endotracheal
-
NCT04483895Unknown
-
NCT02395445Completed
-
NCT02395432Completed
Clinical Trials on Macintosh laryngoscope
-
NCT01311284CompletedNasotracheal Intubation
-
NCT00178555CompletedIntubation, Endotracheal
-
NCT05795231CompletedAdverse Effects of Endotracheal Intubation
-
NCT02069444CompletedAll the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery
-
NCT07050914Completed
-
NCT00803751Completed
-
NCT07277985CompletedPostoperative Vocal Cord Mobility | Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury