Comparison Between McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for DLT Intubation in Thoracic Surgery Patients.

August 9, 2023 updated by: Sadique Ali, Aga Khan University

Comparison Between McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Double-lumen Tube Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery, A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this RCT is to compare outcome with McGrath vs Macintosh laryngoscopes among patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are,

  1. Rate of successful intubation at first attempt and
  2. Time for intubation required with each device. Participants are required to sign the informed consent for, they will be placed in two groups, Group A: Macintosh (DL) Group B: McGrath (VL) Researchers will compare in Group A: Macintosh (DL) and Group B: McGrath (VL) the differences in rate of successful intubation at first attempt and time for intubation required with each device.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
        • Recruiting
        • Aga Khan University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • sadique Wadho, MBBS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Khalid Samad, MBBS, FCPS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65 years
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I, II, III
  • Elective thoracic surgery patients, requiring one lung ventilation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring rapid sequence induction
  • Patients with a structural problem in the airway on chest radiography
  • History of difficult intubation
  • Planned tracheostomy \ the presence of a tracheostomy

    • Patients with a BMI >35 kg\m2. Who at risk of regurgitation\ Aspiration
    • Anticipated Difficult Airway (Mallampati IV)
    • Pre-existing sore throat or hoarseness, or recent respiratory infection (<15 days)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
A conventional Laryngoscope. It is battery powered, with a detachable MaCintosh blade that contains a light source.
Active Comparator: Group B
A video Laryngoscope that has a high-resolution video camera, and a light source at the cone end of the blade allowing for direct and indirect viewing of the glottis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time required for correct placement of the Double Lumen Tube (DLT).
Time Frame: During intervention time period
Time will be measured in seconds during laryngoscopy while placement of Double Lumen Tube (DLT) until appearance of end tidal carbon dioxide on capnograph.
During intervention time period
Successful Intubation at first attempt.
Time Frame: immediately after Intervention.
The number of times the laryngoscope will be inserted.
immediately after Intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on MaCintosh Laryngoscope (DL)

3
Subscribe