Comparison of Optical Quality With Different Placement of Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens

August 3, 2022 updated by: Hong Qi, Peking University Third Hospital
The study aims to compare postoperative optical quality between two different implanting position of a rotationally asymmetric MIOL [SBL-3 Lenstec; +3.00 diopters (D)], angle kappa based implantation and 0 to 180 degree implantation, in order to find out the optimal implantation position for SBL-3.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

SBL-3 has been proved to provide patients with good near, intermediate and distant visual acuity, but there is not much study on the impact of SBL-3 position on postoperative visual acuity.The regional refractive design of SBL-3 means it could be affected by pupil center shift (described by angle kappa: the difference between visual axis and pupil axis), the investigators assume that maintaining the ideal ratio of distant and near segment(50% vs 42%) in the pupil center could yield both good distant and near postoperative visual acuity postoperatively. Therefore, the investigators designed the implantation by placing the IOL based on angle kappa to make sure the ratio of distant and near segment exposure in the pupil center close to 50:42. In this study, the investigators assessed the optical quality in patients with SBL-3 implantation based on angle kappa and 0 to 180 degree to provide surgeons with information for choosing appropriate implantation position for optimum postoperative satisfaction of SBL-3.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

54 years to 81 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age related cataract
  • underwent bilateral cataract surgery and SBL-3 implantation
  • corneal astigmatism <1.5D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with active ocular inflammation
  • neuro-ophthalmic disease and macular disease
  • previous corneal or intraocular surgery, corneal opacities or disease
  • patients had surgical complications, pupillary trauma, inability to place the lens in the capsular bag
  • IOL tilt or decentration deviated from intraoperative positioning
  • difficulties with examinations and follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: control group
Subjects in this group will go through a cataract surgery with SBL-3 implantation in the direction of 0 to 180 degree guided by Callisto Eye System(Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) intraoperatively.
Procedure: 0 to 180 degree SBL-3 implantation
SBL-3 implantation in the direction of 0 to 180 degree guided by Callisto Eye System(Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) intraoperatively.
EXPERIMENTAL: design group
Subjects in this group will go through a cataract surgery with SBL-3 implantation based on kappa angle(described by Pentacam HR preoperatively) guided by Callisto Eye System(Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) intraoperatively.
Procedure: angle kappa based SBL-3 implantation
SBL-3 implantation based on kappa angle guided by Callisto Eye System(Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) intraoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uncorrected visual acuity
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
Comparison of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), intermediate visual acuity, near visual acuity were measured at 5m, 80cm and 33cm respectively. All visual acuity measurements were conducted under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2) and at 100% contrast in design group and control group.
3 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optical quality
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
An OPD scan III aberrometer (NIDEK Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) was used to evaluate postoperative mesopic and photopic pupil diameters and the quality of vision in each subject. Visual acuity was evaluated by MTF(modulation transfer function), SR(strehl ratio), intraocular total aberration, high order aberration, spherical aberration, coma aberration, trefoil aberration under 4mm pupil diameter.
3 months postoperatively
Contrast sensitivity
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
Contrast sensitivity measures were conducted uniocularly, under photopic, mesopic (5 cd/m2), photopic with glare and mesopic with glare conditions, with the OPTEC 6500 contrast sensitivity test (Stereo Optical, USA). Contrast sensitivity was evaluated at five spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree [cpd]). Patients were allowed 5 minutes to adapt to each illumination level before testing.
3 months postoperatively
Defocus curve
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
Monocular defocus curves were obtained in all patients, positioned at 5m under photopic (>85 cd/m 2 ) condition to measure the visual acuity with each defocus lens, representing the consecutive visual function of each eye. Negative lenses were added in 0.50 D steps and the visual acuity was recorded for each type of defocus level. The procedure was then repeated but with positive lenses. The range of defocus evaluated was from -4.00D to +2.00D.
3 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University Third Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Hong Qi, Peking University Third Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 12, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20180906

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract, Age-Related

Clinical Trials on 0 to 180 degree SBL-3 implantation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings