A Phase 3 Open-Label Study of Eculizumab in Pediatric Participants With Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG)

December 4, 2024 updated by: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Eculizumab in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of eculizumab in the treatment of pediatric refractory gMG based on change from Baseline in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score for disease severity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will consist of an up to 4-week Screening Period, 26-week Primary Evaluation Treatment Period, an additional (up to) to 208-week Extension Period, and an 8-week Safety Follow-up Period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Iruma-Gun, Japan, 350-0495
        • Research Site
      • Itabashi-ku, Japan, 173-0003
        • Research Site
      • Shinjuku-ku, Japan, 162-8666
        • Research Site
  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90078
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Research Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Research Site
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201
        • Research Site
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44308
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 13 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female pediatric participants 6 to <18 years of age at time of assent/consent.
  • Vaccinated against Neisseria meningitidis.
  • Documented vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae infections prior to dosing as per local and country specific immunization guidelines for the appropriate age group.
  • Diagnosis of MG confirmed by positive serologic test for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies at Screening, and 1 of the following: (a) history of abnormal neuromuscular transmission test demonstrated by single-fiber electromyography or repetitive nerve stimulation; (b) history of positive anticholinesterase test (for example, edrophonium chloride or neostigmine test); or (c) participant demonstrated improvement in MG signs on oral acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, as assessed by the Investigator.
  • Presence of refractory gMG, defined as participants with gMG who have 1 or more of the following: (a) failed treatment ≥1 year with at least 1 immunosuppressive therapies (IST), defined as follows: (1) persistent weakness with impairment of activities of daily living; (2) myasthenia gravis (MG) exacerbation and/or crisis while on treatment; or (3) intolerance to ISTs due to side effect or comorbid condition(s). (b) Require maintenance plasma exchange (PE) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) to control symptoms; and/or (c) in the opinion of the Investigator, MG poses a significant functional burden despite current MG treatment.
  • MGFA Clinical Classification of Class II to IV at Screening.
  • In patients aged 12 to 18 years, QMG total score ≥ 12 at Screening; in patients aged 6 to 11 years, no minimum QMG is required for inclusion; however, patients must have documented limb weakness in at least one limb.
  • All MG-specific treatment has been administered at a stable dosing regimen of adequate duration prior to Screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or legal guardian is an Alexion employee.
  • Any active or untreated thymoma. History of thymic carcinoma or thymic malignancy unless deemed cured by adequate treatment with no evidence of recurrence for ≥5 years before Screening.
  • History of thymectomy within 12 months prior to Screening.
  • Are pregnant or lactating.
  • Any unresolved acute, or chronic, systemic bacterial or other infection, which is clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator and has not been treated with appropriate antibiotics.
  • Use of PE within 4 weeks prior to first dose.
  • Use of rituximab within 6 months prior to first dose.
  • Patients who are under 15 kg and are receiving maintenance IVIg.
  • Participation in another interventional treatment study or use of any experimental therapy within 30 days before initiation of study drug on Day 1 in this study or within 5 half-lives of that investigational product, whichever is greater.
  • Have previously received treatment with eculizumab or other complement inhibitors.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Eculizumab Intravenous (IV) Infusion

In the Primary Evaluation Treatment Period (26 weeks), eculizumab will be administered weekly during the initial induction phase and every 2 weeks during the maintenance phase.

In the Extension Period (up to 208 weeks), participants will continue to receive eculizumab every 2 weeks.

Eculizumab will be administered at doses of 300, 600, 900, or 1200 milligrams (mg), based on the participant's current body weight.
Drug: Eculizumab
Eculizumab will be administered by IV infusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the QMG Total Score at Week 26 Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The QMG scoring system consists of 13 items: ocular (2 items), facial (1 item), bulbar (2 items), gross motor (6 items), axial (1 item), and respiratory (1 item). Each item is graded from 0 to 3, (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The range of total QMG score is 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Baseline, Week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale Total Score at Week 26 Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The MGC is a validated assessment tool for measuring clinical status of participants with MG. The MGC assesses 10 important functional areas most frequently affected by MG: ocular (2 items), facial (1 item), bulbar (3 items), respiratory (1 item), axial (1 item), and gross motor (2 items). The scales are weighted for clinical significance that incorporates patient-reported outcomes. The MGC total score ranges from 0 to 50, with lower scores indicating less functional impairment and higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in the Neurological Quality of Life-Fatigue Questionnaire (Neuro-QoL Pediatric Fatigue) Total Score at Week 26 Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The Neuro-QoL Pediatric Fatigue questionnaire is a reliable and validated brief 11-item survey of fatigue, completed by the participant for participants ≥12 years of age (at time of assessment) and completed by the participant's caregiver or with caregiver assistance for participants <12 years of age. Each item was scored on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much). Total score is the sum of each item's score and it ranges from 11 to 55. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue and greater impact of MG on activities.
Baseline, Week 26
Number of Participants in Each Category of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Status (MGFAPIS) Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
The MG clinical state (improved, unchanged, and worse) was assessed using the MGFAPIS.
Week 26
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Concentration Of Eculizumab
Time Frame: 24 hours postdose on Day 1; predose and 60 minutes postdose at Week 12; predose at Week 26
24 hours postdose on Day 1; predose and 60 minutes postdose at Week 12; predose at Week 26
PD: Percentage of Hemolysis (In Vitro Assay)
Time Frame: Baseline; 24 hours postdose on Day 1; predose and 60 minutes postdose at Week 12; predose at Week 26
Baseline; 24 hours postdose on Day 1; predose and 60 minutes postdose at Week 12; predose at Week 26
Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Total Score at Week 26 Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The MG-ADL is an 8-point questionnaire that focuses on relevant symptoms and functional performance of activities of daily living in participants with myasthenia gravis (MG). The 8 items of the MG-ADL are derived from symptom-based components of the original 13-item QMG to assess disability secondary to ocular (2 items), bulbar (3 items), respiratory (1 item), and gross motor or limb (2 items) impairment related to effects from MG. In this functional status instrument, each response is graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The range of total MG-ADL score is 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With ≥3-Point Reduction in the MG-ADL Total Score With No Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Week 26
The MG-ADL is an 8-point questionnaire that focuses on relevant symptoms and functional performance of activities of daily living in participants with MG. The 8 items of the MG-ADL are derived from symptom-based components of the original 13-item QMG to assess disability secondary to ocular (2 items), bulbar (3 items), respiratory (1 item), and gross motor or limb (2 items) impairment related to effects from MG. In this functional status instrument, each response is graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The range of total MG-ADL score is 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Week 26
Percentage of Participants With ≥3-Point Reduction in the MG-ADL Total Score Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Week 26
The MG-ADL is an 8-point questionnaire that focuses on relevant symptoms and functional performance of activities of daily living in participants with MG. The 8 items of the MG-ADL are derived from symptom-based components of the original 13-item QMG to assess disability secondary to ocular (2 items), bulbar (3 items), respiratory (1 item), and gross motor or limb (2 items) impairment related to effects from MG. In this functional status instrument, each response is graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The range of total MG-ADL score is 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Week 26
Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction in the QMG Total Score With No Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Week 26
The QMG scoring system consists of 13 items: ocular (2 items), facial (1 item), bulbar (2 items), gross motor (6 items), axial (1 item), and respiratory (1 item). Each item is graded from 0 to 3, (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The range of total QMG score is 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Week 26
Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction in the QMG Total Score Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Week 26
The QMG scoring system consists of 13 items: ocular (2 items), facial (1 item), bulbar (2 items), gross motor (6 items), axial (1 item), and respiratory (1 item). Each item is graded from 0 to 3, (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The range of total QMG score is 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Week 26
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 26 Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The EQ-5D-Y is a reliable and validated survey of health status in 5 areas: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each of which is completed by the participant for participants ≥12 years of age (at time of assessment) and completed by the participant's caregiver or with caregiver assistance for participant <12 years of age. Each area has 3 levels: Level 1 (no problems), Level 2 (some problems), and Level 3 (extreme problems). The EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, 20-centimeter VAS where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state, marked as 100' and 'Worst imaginable health state, marked as 0'.
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Deteriorations, Myasthenic Crises, and Rescue Therapy Use
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 26
Rescue therapy (for example, high dose corticosteroid, plasma exchange, or intravenous immunoglobulin) was to be allowed when a participant experienced clinical deterioration. Clinical deterioration was defined as follows: Participants who experienced an MG crisis, which was defined as weakness due to MG that was severe enough to necessitate intubation or to delay extubation following surgery; or, Significant symptomatic worsening that required rescue medication in the opinion of the Investigator; or, Participants for whom the Investigator believed that the participants' health was in jeopardy if rescue therapy was not given.
Baseline up to Week 26
Pharmacodynamics (PD): Serum Free Complement Component 5 Concentrations
Time Frame: Baseline; 24 hours postdose on Day 1; predose and 60 minutes postdose at Week 12; predose at Week 26
Baseline; 24 hours postdose on Day 1; predose and 60 minutes postdose at Week 12; predose at Week 26
Change From Baseline in the QMG Total Score at Week 52 Regardless of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The QMG scoring system consists of 13 items: ocular (2 items), facial (1 item), bulbar (2 items), gross motor (6 items), axial (1 item), and respiratory (1 item). Each item is graded from 0 to 3, (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The range of total QMG score is 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Baseline, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ECU-MG-303
  • 2016-001384-37 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myasthenia Gravis

Clinical Trials on Eculizumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings