Erector Spinae Plane Versus Interscalene Blocks for Shoulder Surgery

March 4, 2020 updated by: Chi-Ho Ban Tsui, Stanford University
The goal of this study is the evaluation of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks as an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus nerve blocks for rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Currently, single shot interscalene nerve blocks are performed for rotator cuff repair surgeries, and interscalene nerve catheters are placed for total shoulder arthroplasty surgeries. Erector spinae plane blocks are commonly used as part of the anesthetic plan for other surgeries, but less so for shoulder surgeries. The investigators would like to study whether an ESP block can provide similar pain control compared to an interscalene nerve block, with less risk of upper extremity motor block and phrenic nerve block.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford Health Care (SHC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- All adult patients (18 years and over) scheduled for rotator cuff surgery or total shoulder arthroplasty surgery requiring a nerve block as part of their anesthetic care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant life-threatening injuries and other concomitant injuries causing significant pain.
  • pregnancy,
  • any condition impairing patient's ability to consent to participation in study
  • an existing condition contraindicating a nerve block, i.e. nerve injury, existing bleeding disorder
  • infection in the vicinity of the block, and patient refusal.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Interscalene nerve block
Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery or total shoulder arthroplasty will undergo a single shot interscalene brachial plexus nerve block or an interscalene brachial plexus nerve catheter. In the preoperative area, all participants will be asked baseline indicators of pain level via a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable pain) and diaphragmatic excursion will be measured bilaterally using ultrasonography before nerve block placement. Motor and sensory exams will also be performed. The same parameters will be measured 30 minutes after the block is performed. In the recovery room, those with nerve catheters will receive a dose of local anesthetic. All patients will have the same parameters measured 30 minutes postoperatively.
Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus nerve block
An interscalene brachial plexus nerve block (single shot or catheter, depending on surgical procedure) will be placed under ultrasound guidance and all patients will receive 10cc 0.5% ropivacaine during block placement. Patients with a nerve catheter will receive a bolus of 5cc 0.5% ropivicaine postoperatively, on arrival to the recovery unit.
Active Comparator: Erector Spinae Plane block
Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery or total shoulder arthroplasty will undergo a single shot erector spinae plane block or receive erector spinae plane catheter. In the preoperative area, all participants will be asked baseline indicators of pain level via a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable pain) and diaphragmatic excursion will be measured bilaterally using ultrasonography before nerve block placement. Motor and sensory exams will also be performed. The same parameters will be measured 30 minutes after the block is performed. In the recovery room, those with nerve catheters will receive a dose of local anesthetic. All patients will have the same parameters measured 30 minutes postoperatively.
Procedure: Erector spinae plane block
An erector spinae plane block (single shot or catheter, depending on surgical procedure) will be placed under ultrasound guidance and all patients will receive 10cc 0.5% ropivacaine during block placement. Patients with a nerve catheter will receive a bolus of 5cc 0.5% ropivicaine postoperatively, on arrival to the recovery unit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of diaphragmatic paresis or paralysis
Time Frame: Before block placement, and 30 minutes after catheter is bolused in recovery
Change in diaphragmatic excursion (measured bilaterally using ultrasonography) from before block placement to 30 minutes after catheter is bolused in recovery
Before block placement, and 30 minutes after catheter is bolused in recovery
Pain score
Time Frame: 48 hours
Pain scores for all patients will be recorded through the first 48 hours postoperatively using the Numeric Rating scale (ranging from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable pain).
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brachial plexus sensory exam change
Time Frame: Before block placement, and 30 minutes after catheter is bolused in recovery
Brachial plexus sensory exam change: dichotomous measurement (yes or no) for change in sensation over C5-C8 dermatomes
Before block placement, and 30 minutes after catheter is bolused in recovery
Brachial plexus motor exam change
Time Frame: Before block placement, and 30 minutes after catheter is bolused in recovery
Brachial plexus motor exam change: dichotomous measurement (yes or no) for change in finger extension, finger abduction and thumb opposition to resistance
Before block placement, and 30 minutes after catheter is bolused in recovery
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours
Opioid consumption in the recovery room and in the first 48 hours postoperatively will be recorded
48 hours
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 72 hours
Patient-reported adverse effects (dichotomous measure, yes/no): dyspnea, Horner syndrome, hoarseness, difficulty participating in physical therapy due to block
72 hours
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 72 hours
Patient satisfaction with the nerve block (dichotomous measure: yes/no)
72 hours
Incentive spirometry volume change
Time Frame: 24 hours
Change in incentive spirometry volume from baseline (prior to block) to recovery room, and to postoperative day 1.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ban Tsui, MD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 22, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 48351

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local

Clinical Trials on Interscalene brachial plexus nerve block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings