Simulated Clinical Use Testing on Safety Lancets (Test A)

January 18, 2019 updated by: HTL-Strefa S.A.

Simulated Clinical Use Testing to Evaluate Sharps Injury Prevention Features of HTL-STREFA's Safety Lancets (Test A)

A simulated clinical use testing on the HTL-Strefa's safety lancets

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate the safety of the use of the safety lancets: ergoLance and Acti-Lance in the prevention of NSI and to evaluate the user's opinion with regards to the handling characteristics of the medical devices.

The simulated use clinical study will involve healthcare professionals (HCPs) who routinely use safety lancets to collect blood samples and lay persons.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60606
        • UL LLC
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02116
        • Schlesinger Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria for HCP and lay person evaluators have been chosen based on FDA guidance:

  • (HCP evaluators only) - evaluators who routinely use safety lancets to collect capillary blood samples (prevention of the learning curve artifacts)
  • evaluators will be United States (US) residents
  • evaluators can read, write, and speak English
  • evaluators are at least 18 years old
  • evaluators are able to understand and provide signed consent for the study
  • evaluators are willing to comply with the study protocol, including being willing to answer questions and complete questionnaires.
  • evaluators have no concerns about the ability to perform the simulated skin pricking.

Lay person evaluators will have a diverse range of ages (18+ years), socioeconomic statuses, and race/ethnic backgrounds. UL-Wiklund will recruit some lay person evaluators with reduced vision and dexterity. Users without safety lancet experience may also be included in this simulated clinical use study.

Exclusion Criteria:

HCPs:

  • They do not routinely use safety lancets to collect capillary blood samples,
  • They cannot read, write, and speak English,
  • They or a family member have a business or consulting relationship with a pharmaceutical or medical device company, or
  • They have participated in a product evaluation or marketing study involving safety lancets within the last six months

Lay people:

  • They cannot read, write, and speak English,
  • They or a family member have a business or consulting relationship with a pharmaceutical or medical device company, or
  • They have participated in a product evaluation or marketing study involving safety lancets within the last six months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: simulation of skin pricking type 450
The evaluator simulated the capillary blood sampling with the safety lancet type 450
Device: ergoLance safety lancet
The ergoLance contact activated safety lancets type 450 are sterile, single-use safety lancets designed for the sampling of capillary blood from the fingertip of patients.
Experimental: simulation of skin pricking type 610
The evaluator simulated the capillary blood sampling with the safety lancet type 610
Device: Acti-Lance safety lancet
The Acti-Lance safety lancet type 610 is a sterile, single use device used to carry out skin punctures for the purpose of collecting capillary blood samples.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The true failure rate of the tested devices
Time Frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Effectiveness of the safety lancet's sharps injury prevention features
Time Frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.
At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective assessments regarding evaluators' interactions with the tested safety lancets
Time Frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.
At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Safety of the devices based on the evaluators' assessments (five-point response scale)
Time Frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure any and all observed needlestick injuries and device malfunctions. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.
At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Various aspects of the ease of use.
Time Frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.
At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Any handling, usability questions / issues associated with the device
Time Frame: At time of testing, up to 90 minutes
Evaluator questionnaire using five-point response Likert scale (coded from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree") to measure respondents' attitudes to a particular question or statement. Numbers assigned to Likert scale express a "greater than" relationship.
At time of testing, up to 90 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
HTL-Strefa S.A.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 13, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 13, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Test A

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Needle Stick

Clinical Trials on ergoLance safety lancet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings