Povidone Iodine vs AVEnova: A Pre-injection Disinfection Study (PAVE Study) (PAVE)

March 6, 2020 updated by: Robert Avery, California Retina Consultants
To compare the efficacy and comfort of two FDA approved pre-injection antiseptics when used for intravitreal injections.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Intravitreal injection of medicine has become the most common ocular procedure billed to Medicare. One of the main problems with this procedure is the postoperative discomfort due to the need to disinfect the eye with Povidone Iodine (PI). This disinfectant lowers the risk of endophthalmitis, but is very rough on the corneal epithelium, producing a type of corneal abrasion in many patients that is very uncomfortable in the first few days after injection. Many patients refuse the PI disinfection even though avoiding it increases the risk of endophthalmitis with the procedure. Recently another disinfectant has been FDA approved specifically for the eye to treat blepharitis and dry eye. Avenova (Av), a dilute solution of hypochlorous acid, is used several times a day for these conditions. Some practices have begun using it for PI sensitive patients before an intravitreal injection as it is FDA-approved for disinfecting peri-ocular structures. A recent in vitro study was published showing that it is superior to PI in kill times for bacteria cultured for endophthalmitis cases. Some physicians say it is superior to PI with respect to patient comfort, however, to date, there is little literature about its use for intravitreal injection. The objective of this study is to assess comfort levels between the two FDA-approved disinfection options and to compare disinfection rates between PI and Av. The hypothesis is that Av will be as effective or more effective in elimination ocular pathogens as PI and will be significantly more comfortable for patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93103
        • California Retina Consultants

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be receiving same day bilateral injections of an anti-VEGF agent for any ophthalmic condition.
  • Subject must be fluent in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years old.
  • Subjects with an allergy or adverse reaction to Povidone Iodine or Avenova.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Open label test arm
Subjects will have their right eye treated with 5% Povidone Iodine per standard institutional protocol prior to receiving their intravitreal injection (2 drops of PI followed by application of 3.5% non-preserved lidocaine gel for 10 minutes, followed by 1 drop of PI for 30 seconds prior to injection). Subjects will have their left eye treated with Avenova per the same application protocol as PI prior to receiving their intravitreal injection. Prior to and following disinfecting both eyes but before the injection, a physician will gently swab the inferior conjunctival fornix (white part of each eye below the lower eye lid) with an ocular brush. Swabs will be cultured to compare bacterial counts. Subjects will be asked to complete a questionnaire regarding comfort of the disinfectant and injection procedure in general immediately following the injection and 1-2 hours post-injection.
Other: Povidone Iodine
FDA-approved disinfectant for intravitreal injections
Other: Hypochlorous Acid
FDA-approved disinfectant for intravitreal injections
Other Names:
  • Avenova

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comfort of Povidone Iodine vs Avenova immediately post-treatment based on an 11-point numerical scale (0-10, with 0 being no pain, and 10 being extreme pain)
Time Frame: Immediately following the subject's injection.
Reported comfort levels will be collected immediately after the injection procedure. Average reported comfort levels in the Povidone Iodine group will be compared with average reported comfort levels from the Avenova group at each time point using a paired Student's T-test.
Immediately following the subject's injection.
Comfort of Povidone Iodine vs Avenova 1-2 hours post treatment based on an 11-point numerical scale (0-10, with 0 being no pain, and 10 being extreme pain)
Time Frame: 1-2 hours post-injection.
Reported comfort levels will be collected 1-2 hours post-injection. Average reported comfort levels in the Povidone Iodine group will be compared with average reported comfort levels from the Avenova group at each time point using a paired Student's T-test.
1-2 hours post-injection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in colony forming unit (CFU) growth pre- and post-treatment with Povidone Iodine or Avenova to determine if Avenova is non-inferior to Povidone Iodine for ocular disinfection.
Time Frame: Two time points: 30 seconds before disinfection starts (time point 0); and after the 10 minutes disinfection period and prior just prior to the injection (time point 1).
Conjunctival swabs will be taken pre- and post-ocular disinfection and plated on Chocolate agar and blood agar. After incubating for 48 hours, average colony forming units from each agar type will be counted and the average of the ratio of [post-disinfection/pre-disinfection] will be compared between the Povisone Iodine treated eyes and the Avenova treated eyes for each agar type using a paired Student's T-Test.
Two time points: 30 seconds before disinfection starts (time point 0); and after the 10 minutes disinfection period and prior just prior to the injection (time point 1).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
California Retina Consultants

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Avery, MD, California Retina Consultants

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PAVE study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

we do not plan to share IPD with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trials on Povidone Iodine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings