Effect of Brain Training Through Visual Mirror Feedback, Action Observation Training and Motor Imagery on Orofacial Sensorimotor Variables in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Roy La Touche
- Phone Number: +349174019803
- Email: roylatouche@yahoo.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Luis Suso Martí
- Phone Number: 627819667
- Email: luis.suso@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28023
- CSEU La Salle
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- healthy individuals with no pain
- aged between 18 and 65 years
- subjects with correct masticatory function and labial and lingual mobility
Exclusion Criteria:
- individuals who presented systemic, cardiorespiratory, central nervous system or rheumatic diseases, or those who presented any musculoskeletal or craniocervical pathology
- underage individuals
- individuals with orofacial pain or temporomandibular disorders at the time of the study; (d) subjects' complaint of toothache or tenderness to percussion.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Action Observation
|
Orofacial exercise plus action observation (video) of the same exercise
|
|
Experimental: Motor Imagery
|
Orofacial exercise plus motor imagery of the same exercise
|
|
Experimental: Visual mirror feedback
|
Exercise plus visual mirror feedback
|
|
Active Comparator: Orofacial exercise
|
Orofacial exercises
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain pressure thresholds (PPTs)
Time Frame: Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
PPT is defined as the minimal amount of pressure where a sense of pressure first changes to pain.
The mechanical pressure algometer (Force Ten TM FDX Digital Force Gage) used in this study consisted of a round rubber disk (area, 1 cm2) attached to a pressure (force) gauge.
The gauge displays values in kilograms but, because the surface of the rubber tip is 1 cm2, the readings are expressed in kg/cm2.
The range of values of the pressure algometer is 0 to 10 kg, with 0.1-kg divisions.
The pressure was applied at a rate of 0.31 kg/second (Chesterton et al. 2007).
Chesterton et al. (2007) have shown that the reliability of pressure algometry is as high as [ICC=0.91
(95% confidence interval, CI 0.82-0.97)].
|
Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
|
Lingual muscle endurance
Time Frame: Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
Lingual muscle endurance was assessed using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) (Adams et al. 2015).
The measurement of muscular endurance was carried out by placing a plastic bulb with oblong air content on the hard palate, posterior to the central incisor teeth.
The participants were asked to elevate the lingual (through anterior and posterior lingual region) to press the instrument with the maximum possible force for 3 seconds, while monitoring the force exerted, quantified in Newtons.
Adams et al. (2015) found moderate to strong reliability for anterior (ICC: 0.58-0.77)
and posterior (ICC 0.77-0.84)
tongue strength.
|
Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
Time Frame: Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
The craniomandibular scale was used to assess the MMO.
It was held with the right hand and the left hand was placed on the forehead to maintain the participant's neutral position.
The following verbal command was given: "open your mouth as wide as you can without moving your head".
The assessor placed the scale on the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor that was most vertically oriented, measured vertically to the labioincisal edge of the opposing mandibular incisor, and recorded this as the MMO measurement.
Beltran-Alacreu et al. (2014) showed that reliability for MMO was good (inter-rater, ICC= 0.95-0.96;
intra-rater, ICC= 0.95-0.96).
Zawawi et al. (2003) found that the normal range of mouth opening in women is 40-57 mm and 42-68 mm in men
|
Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
|
Lingual extensibility
Time Frame: Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
This variable consists of measuring the tongue in centimeters, from the chin to the lingual vertex.
Through the use of a lingual depressor, located in the midface sagittal axis at the height of the chin, the subject was asked for a maximum lingual protrusion, extending his tongue as far as possible, indicating that route on the lingual depressor and then measuring that distance.
The mean obtained from two measurements was recorded.
|
Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
|
Ability to generate mental motor images
Time Frame: Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
Movement imagery questionnaire-revised (MIQ-R) is an 8-item self-report inventory and was used to assess visual and kinesthetic motor imagery ability.
Four different movements are included in MIQ-R and it is comprised of four visual and four kinesthetic items.
For each item, participants read a description of the movement.
They then physically perform the movement and were instructed to re-assume the starting position after finishing the movement and before performing the mental task, imaging the movement visually or kinesthetically.
Then, each participant rated the ease or difficulty of generating that image on a 7-point scale in which 7 indicates "very easy to see/feel" and 1 "very difficult to see/feel.
The internal consistencies of the MIQ-R have been consistently adequate with Cronbach's α coefficients ranging above 0.84 for the total scale, 0.80 for de visual subscale and 0.84 for the kinesthetic subscale (Campos and González 2010).
|
Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- uammadrid9
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
NCT07190807RecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg Pain
-
NCT07454083Not yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
NCT00866164Approved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
NCT04640896RecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial Pain
-
NCT05187390RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATS
-
NCT00929188CompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, Splitting
-
NCT04280796CompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic
-
NCT03727373CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, Cancer
-
NCT03597737CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Oncology
-
NCT05785104CompletedCervical Pain | Lumbar Pain Syndrome
Clinical Trials on Exercise plus action observation
-
NCT06108323Active, not recruiting
-
NCT03959449CompletedAnalgesia | Exercise
-
NCT06073210CompletedMotor Imagery | Therapeutic Exercise | Action Observation
-
NCT06090435CompletedMotor Imagery | Therapeutic Exercise | Action Observation
-
NCT06306885Not yet recruitingHand Injuries | Motor Imagery | Action Observation
-
NCT05957133Not yet recruitingExercise | Aging
-
NCT06814782Not yet recruiting
-
NCT03245073CompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee | Pain, Chronic
-
NCT03792165CompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Exercise | Action Observation Therapy | Functional Near Infared Spectroscopy