Study to Learn More About the Onset of Effect of Iberogast in Patients Suffering From Abnormal Stomach and Intestine Function

September 17, 2019 updated by: Bayer

Non-interventional Study on the Onset of Effect of Iberogast in Patients With Functional or Motility-related Gastrointestinal Diseases

Several studies have been done on the efficacy of the herbal medicine Iberogast. In this study researcher want to learn more about the time needed for Iberogast to start to work after the patient took the drug. This study plans to enroll 300 adult male and female patients suffering from disturbance of stomach and intestine normal function and treated by their doctor with Iberogast drops. Patients will be asked to document on a diary card the changes of symptom severity of the stomach and intestine complaints and the time needed for the symptoms to improve after drug intake. At the end of the study the treating doctor and the patients will be asked about the overall changes of symptoms. In addition information on the safety of the drug and how well the drug is tolerated by the patients will be collected

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
272

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Multiple Locations, Germany
        • Many locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Male or female patients of at least 18 years were to be observed

Description

Inclusion criteria:

At the discretion of physician under the instructions of Rome III criteria concerning functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the summary of product characteristics of Iberogast

Exclusion criteria:

Therapeutic necessity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of GIS score from baseline up to 3 weeks after treatment
Time Frame: At baseline and up to 3 weeks post-treatment
Gastrointestinal System Profile (GIS) includes 5 scores: 0=Not available, 1=Slight, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Very severe
At baseline and up to 3 weeks post-treatment
Global assessment by the physicians using a 4-point likert scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Therapeutic success assessed by physicians. 0=Not improved, 1=Slightly improved, 2=Significantly approved, 3=No symptoms
Up to 3 weeks
Global assessment by the patient using a 4-point likert scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Therapeutic success assessed by patient. 0=Not improved, 1=Slightly improved, 2=Significantly approved, 3=No symptoms
Up to 3 weeks
Change of ratings of symptom severity on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over time after intake of Iberogast
Time Frame: At baseline and up to 2 hours post-treatment on day 1
Visual Analogue Scale to evaluate the general severity of symptoms. It is an unmarked scale on a line 100 mm in length, indicating from 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (severe symptoms).
At baseline and up to 2 hours post-treatment on day 1
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 1
Time Frame: On day 1
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 1
On day 1
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 2
Time Frame: On day 2
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 2
On day 2
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 3
Time Frame: On day 3
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 3
On day 3
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 4
Time Frame: On day 4
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 4
On day 4
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 5
Time Frame: On day 5
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 5
On day 5
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 6
Time Frame: On day 6
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 6
On day 6
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 7
Time Frame: On day 7
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 7
On day 7
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 8
Time Frame: On day 8
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 8
On day 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Participants who had adverse events during the study
Up to 3 weeks
The number of participants who discontinued from treatment
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Participants who discontinued from study treatment
Up to 3 weeks
The number of participants with the need of further treatment
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Participants who needed further treatment
Up to 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 17, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 27, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 20, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20984

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Availability of this study's data will be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the Study sponsors section of the portal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Clinical Trials on STW5 (Iberogast®, BAY98-7411)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings