Study to Learn More About the Onset of Effect of Iberogast in Patients Suffering From Abnormal Stomach and Intestine Function

September 17, 2019 updated by: Bayer

Non-interventional Study on the Onset of Effect of Iberogast in Patients With Functional or Motility-related Gastrointestinal Diseases

Several studies have been done on the efficacy of the herbal medicine Iberogast. In this study researcher want to learn more about the time needed for Iberogast to start to work after the patient took the drug. This study plans to enroll 300 adult male and female patients suffering from disturbance of stomach and intestine normal function and treated by their doctor with Iberogast drops. Patients will be asked to document on a diary card the changes of symptom severity of the stomach and intestine complaints and the time needed for the symptoms to improve after drug intake. At the end of the study the treating doctor and the patients will be asked about the overall changes of symptoms. In addition information on the safety of the drug and how well the drug is tolerated by the patients will be collected

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

272

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Multiple Locations, Germany
        • Many Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Male or female patients of at least 18 years were to be observed

Description

Inclusion criteria:

At the discretion of physician under the instructions of Rome III criteria concerning functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the summary of product characteristics of Iberogast

Exclusion criteria:

Therapeutic necessity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of GIS score from baseline up to 3 weeks after treatment
Time Frame: At baseline and up to 3 weeks post-treatment
Gastrointestinal System Profile (GIS) includes 5 scores: 0=Not available, 1=Slight, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Very severe
At baseline and up to 3 weeks post-treatment
Global assessment by the physicians using a 4-point likert scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Therapeutic success assessed by physicians. 0=Not improved, 1=Slightly improved, 2=Significantly approved, 3=No symptoms
Up to 3 weeks
Global assessment by the patient using a 4-point likert scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Therapeutic success assessed by patient. 0=Not improved, 1=Slightly improved, 2=Significantly approved, 3=No symptoms
Up to 3 weeks
Change of ratings of symptom severity on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over time after intake of Iberogast
Time Frame: At baseline and up to 2 hours post-treatment on day 1
Visual Analogue Scale to evaluate the general severity of symptoms. It is an unmarked scale on a line 100 mm in length, indicating from 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (severe symptoms).
At baseline and up to 2 hours post-treatment on day 1
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 1
Time Frame: On day 1
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 1
On day 1
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 2
Time Frame: On day 2
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 2
On day 2
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 3
Time Frame: On day 3
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 3
On day 3
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 4
Time Frame: On day 4
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 4
On day 4
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 5
Time Frame: On day 5
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 5
On day 5
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 6
Time Frame: On day 6
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 6
On day 6
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 7
Time Frame: On day 7
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 7
On day 7
Onset of improvement assessed by patient on day 8
Time Frame: On day 8
The onset of effect (severity of the functional gastrointestinal symptoms as well as the time frame within which the symptoms improved) was documented by the patients in the patient diary card. According to the time frame stated in the card (1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, more than 2 hours), the patients had to mark the time with a cross at which their symptoms significantly improved (i.e. perceived by the patient) following the one-time intake of Iberogast at morning, noon and evening on day 8
On day 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Participants who had adverse events during the study
Up to 3 weeks
The number of participants who discontinued from treatment
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Participants who discontinued from study treatment
Up to 3 weeks
The number of participants with the need of further treatment
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Participants who needed further treatment
Up to 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20984

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Availability of this study's data will be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the Study sponsors section of the portal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Clinical Trials on STW5 (Iberogast®, BAY98-7411)

3
Subscribe