Goal Management Training in Individuals With PTSD

February 3, 2023 updated by: Lawson Health Research Institute

An EffectivenessTrial Examining a Novel Approach to Cognitive Remediation in Individuals With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

This study will evaluate the effect of a manualized treatment (Goal Management Training, or GMT) on the cognitive impairments associated with PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), as well as any impact on PTSD symptems themselves. Participants will be randomized to either GMT group treatment, or a wait list condition.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PTSD has an emotional impact on individuals, but it is also associated with impaired cognitive functioning (e.g., processing speed, attention, executive functioning). This study is an effectiveness trial investigating a cognitive remediation intervention (Goal Management Training, or GMT) that has been shown to improve the cognitive impairment observed in other populations (e.g., older adults). The present study will investigate the impact of GMT in adults experiencing PTSD (including frontline healthcare workers suffering from PTSD related to the COVID-19 pandemic) and its associated cognitive impairment. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions - GMT, or a wait list condition (in which GMT will be postponed for approximately 21 weeks). Due to the pandemic, this study will be conducted primarily online (i.e., online assessments and treatment, with optional fMRI scans - functional magnetic resonance imaging). Once all assessments are complete, participants in the wait list condition will be able to begin GMT thelmselves.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
        • London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of PTSD as determined by our baseline assessment
  • Due to online nature: must have access to (and ability to use) a computer/tablet with a working microphone and camera (or webcam), reliable access to a secure internet connection, and access to a quiet, private space for the assessments and group sessions.
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Fluency in written and spoken English
  • must be resident of Ontario (due to restrictions of professional licenses)

Exclusion Criteria for those opting in to fMRI scan:

  • any implants, conditions, etc. that do not comply with 7T (Tesla) fMRI research safety standards (e.g., pacemaker, pregnancy/possible pregnancy)

Exclusion Criteria for study in general:

  • history of significant head injury/lengthy loss of consciousness (e.g., a Glasgow Coma Scale Score < 15 at the time of incident as assessed retrospectively by participant)
  • significant untreated medical illness
  • history of neurological or neurodevelopmental disorder
  • history of any pervasive developmental disorder
  • any medical disorder known to adversely affect cognition within the last 12 months
  • lifetime bipolar or psychotic disorder
  • alcohol/substance abuse or dependence within the last 3 months
  • extensive narcotic use (e.g., fentanyl, oxycodone, etc.), use of anti-cholinergics, anti-psychotics, psychostimulants, or benzodiazepines
  • ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) within the last 12 months
  • significant dissociative disorder (as determined by our baseline assessment)
  • suicide attempt in last 6 months
  • pregnancy (due to impact of hormones on cognitive abilities)
  • hearing or vision issues that would interfere with effective online participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Goal Management Training (GMT)
Participants in this arm will attend 9 weekly, 2-hour group GMT appointments.
Behavioral: Goal Management Training (GMT)
GMT is a structured, short-term cognitive remediation program with an emphasis on mindfulness and practice in planning and completion of goal-oriented behaviours. The main objective of GMT is to help participants regain executive control in order to better define goals and monitor performance in achieving them. Sessions include instructional material, interactive tasks, discussion of patients' real-life deficits, and homework assignments. Mindfulness meditation is also incorporated for the purpose of developing the skill of bringing one's mind to the present to monitor ongoing behaviour, goal states, and the relationship between them, and for the development of attentional control. The program incorporates real-life examples to illustrate goal attainment failures and successes, as well as in-session practice of complex tasks that mimic real-life tasks - typically a challenge for individuals with executive function deficits (e.g., planning and set-shifting tasks).
NO_INTERVENTION: Wait List
Participants in this arm will receive no treatment for approximately 21 weeks (at which point, they will be offered the same, standard GMT treatment).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) scores from baseline to post-treatment assessment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
A computer-based go/no-go task that requires participants to withhold behavioral response to a single, infrequent target presented amidst a background of frequent non-targets. This task assesses inattentiveness, impulsivity, sustained attention, and vigilance.
9 weeks
Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) scores from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A computer-based go/no-go task that requires participants to withhold behavioral response to a single, infrequent target presented amidst a background of frequent non-targets. This task assesses inattentiveness, impulsivity, sustained attention, and vigilance.
12 weeks
Change in score on Tower Test (part of Millisecond's online cognitive battery) from baseline to post-treatment assessment.
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Assesses the participant's ability to act with forethought, and sequence behaviour in an orderly fashion to reach specific goals (i.e., executive functioning). Similar to the Tower of London test.
9 weeks
Change in score on Tower Test (part of Millisecond's online cognitive battery) from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Assesses the participant's ability to act with forethought, and sequence behaviour in an orderly fashion to reach specific goals (i.e., executive functioning). Similar to the Tower of London test.
12 weeks
Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) score from baseline to post-treatment assessment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
A 36-item self-report measure that assesses difficulties with emotion regulation across six domains. A total score is derived by summing all the items - ranging from 36 to 180. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction in emotion regulation.
9 weeks
Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) score from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A 36-item self-report measure that assesses difficulties with emotion regulation across six domains. A total score is derived by summing all the items - ranging from 36 to 180. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction in emotion regulation.
12 weeks
Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score from baseline to post-treatment assessment
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Gold standard, clinician administered PTSD assessment tool; min. score=0, max=80, with higher scores representing greater PTSD symptoms
9 weeks
Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score from post-treatment to 3-month follow-up assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Gold standard, clinician administered PTSD assessment tool; min. score=0, max=80, with higher scores representing greater PTSD symptoms
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lawson Health Research Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
FDC Foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 30, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10037 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)
  • 116096 (REGISTRY: Western University's Research Ethics Board)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only coded data will be shared with co-investigators who are registered with the study's ethics board application.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings