Multimodal Instrumented Assessment of Post-stroke Elbow
Robotic Rehabilitation and Multimodal Instrumented Assessment of Post-stroke Elbow Motor Functions - a Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Federico Posteraro, MD
- Phone Number: +39 05846057061
- Email: federico.posteraro@uslnordovest.toscana.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nicola Vitiello, Prof
- Phone Number: +39 050883111
- Email: nicola.vitiello@santannapisa.it
Study Locations
-
-
Lucca
-
Camaiore, Lucca, Italy, 55041
- Ospedale Versilia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Upper limb spasticity due to neurological impairment;
- Cognitive abilities sufficient for understanding instructions;
- Absence of severe pain assessed as Visual Analogic Score (VAS) < 4 (range 0-10).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable general clinical conditions;
- Inability to keep sitting posture;
- Tendon retractions limiting upper limb joints range of motion.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Robotic treatment
Patients receive 4 weeks of elbow rehabilitation treatment provided by the NEEM robotic elbow exoskeleton
|
The treatment group will be further divided into two levels (sub-groups), based on pathological severity: Level 1 corresponds to an FM score equal or below 28, and Level 2 with FM greater than 28.
The two sub-groups will receive different combinations of robotically assisted passive mobilization (PM) and active mobilization (AM) treatment modalities, according to their differing clinical needs
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional treatment
Patients receive 4 weeks of elbow conventional rehabilitation treatment matched in time
|
The treatment group will be further divided into two levels (sub-groups), based on pathological severity: Level 1 corresponds to an FM score equal or below 28, and Level 2 with FM greater than 28.
The two sub-groups will receive different combinations of robotically assisted passive mobilization (PM) and active mobilization (AM) treatment modalities, according to their differing clinical needs
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the score of the upper-extremity section of Fugl-Meyer assessment scale (FM 0-66) higher score means better
Time Frame: before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
It is a clinical scale used for the assessment of motor function in stroke patients
|
before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Change in the score of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS 0-5 scoring 1+ as 2 for statistical analysis) higher score means worse
Time Frame: Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
It is a clinical scale for spasticity assessment
|
Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Maximum Extension Torque (MET)
Time Frame: Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
It corresponds to the maximum torque value recorded during a static hold phase at the maximum reached extension angle
|
Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Change in Zero Torque Angle (ZTA)
Time Frame: Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
It is the angular value corresponding to null torque exerted by the robot; in this configuration, flexor and extensor torques are equal and opposite and the system is ideally not applying any force to hold the elbow in position, which has reached its equilibrium point
|
Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Change in Joint Impedance (JIMP)
Time Frame: Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
A measure of the limb resistance to muscle elongation, extracted as the ratio between joint torque and joint angular position for constant, slow-speed movements, the main contribution to the joint impedance can be identified in the joint stiffness (i.e.
rigidity).
|
Before and within 1 week after 4 weeks of treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NEEM20160118
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
NCT07208422RecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After Stroke
-
NCT07224178RecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, Embolic
-
NCT07433972Not yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Survivors
-
NCT07236216RecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Patient
-
NCT04956185RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
-
NCT05046106Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
NCT06127602RecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, Cerebrovascular
-
NCT05815368RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
-
NCT07478042CompletedAcute Ischemic Stroke | Acute Ischemic Stroke AIS | Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
-
NCT07353203CompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Exoskeleton
Clinical Trials on Neuroexsos elbow module
-
NCT03126175CompletedDistal Radius Fracture
-
NCT05552209Recruiting
-
NCT05850325Enrolling by invitation
-
NCT03596736Active, not recruitingDistal Humerus Fracture
-
NCT06117865Active, not recruitingIBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
-
NCT07534930Active, not recruitingIBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome) | DGBI
-
NCT07212036RecruitingSupracondylar Humerus Fracture | Humerus Fractures | Elbow Dislocation | Radial Head Fractures | Elbow Pain | Radial Head or Neck Fractures | Jakob II Classification
-
NCT07182994CompletedPediatrics | Immobilization
-
NCT06059092Not yet recruitingWellbeing | Emotional Distress | Psychosocial Problem | Functional Impairment | User Experience