Effects of Methylprednisolone Plus Ropivacaine Infiltration Before Wound Closure on Laminoplasty or Laminectomy

May 18, 2021 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Laminoplasty and laminectomy are useful surgical procedures for the management of various conditions pertaining the spinal cord such as myelopathy, radiculopathy, neoplasm, stenosis, disc herniation, hematoma, abscess, traumatic injuries, etc. Both are generally effective procedures that decompress the spinal cord by expanding the space available for the spinal cord. Both procedures provide good neural decompression and functional improvement after surgery, thereby preventing catastrophic cord injury. However, patients undergoing these procedures experience severe pain in the postoperative period; this may lead to the increase in postoperative morbidity and complications. Suboptimal analgesic therapy causes discomfort to the patient and could increase the incidence of postoperative complications, prolong hospital stay and increase health expenses. The extensive exposure to multiple levels in spine surgeries lead to postoperative pain caused by muscular dissection and requires adequate pain relief to hasten rehabilitation, so that the incidence of chronic pain is significantly decreased. This pain is usually treated with intramuscular, epidural or IV-PCA (Intravenous- Patient Controlled Analgesia) opioids. Several oral analgesics, intermittent intravenous and intramuscular injections and PCA with several systemic side effects, have long been used for the control of postoperative pain. In 1953, Lewis et al. established that local infiltration is a reliable pain relief technique for postoperative pain, with the advantages of safety, simplicity and low cost. The intraoperative injection of 40 mg of methylprednisolone via the intra-buccal approach into the masseter muscle has found to have significantly reduced swelling, trismus and postoperative pain associated with the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. A single, preoperative dose of Methylprednisolone 125 mg IV before Total Knee Arthroplasty led to improvement of postoperative analgesia and immediate recovery, when combined with an extensive, multimodal oral and local infiltration analgesic regime. Preemptive administration of bupivacaine or bupivacaine plus methylprednisolone to the paravertebral muscles in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy has been proved to provide effective analgesia in the early postoperative period, when compared to patients who received no local anesthetic or steroid. The infiltration of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine plus methylprednisolone in single distance-single site, lumbar disc surgery established that postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly lower and the first analgesia demand time was also significantly later in the local anesthesia plus methylprednisolone group, compared to the control group. A randomized controlled trial of a larger scale, with a longer follow-up period, could provide a more significant data. Therefore this study has been designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study with a 1 month follow-up period, to compare the efficacy of methylprednisolone plus ropivacaine versus ropivacaine alone, administered before wound closure, for providing analgesia after laminoplasty and laminectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
132

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100070
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for laminoplasty or laminectomy under general anesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II
  • Age 18 to 64 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Inability to give written informed consent
  • Participants who cannot use a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and cannot understand the instructions of a Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
  • Previous history of spinal surgery
  • Allergy to opioids, methylprednisolone or ropivacaine
  • Peri-incisional infection
  • History of stroke or a major neurological deficit
  • Trauma, deformity
  • Psychological problems
  • Extreme body mass index (BMI) (< 15 or > 35)
  • History of excessive alcohol or drug abuse, chronic opioid use (more than 2 weeks), or use of drugs with confirmed or suspected sedative or analgesic effects
  • Patients using systemic steroids
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • Preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale < 15
  • Participants who have received radiation therapy or chemotherapy preoperatively, or a high probability to require a postoperative radiation therapy or chemotherapy according to the preoperative imaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: methylprednisolone + ropivacaine + saline
The local infiltration solution in the methylprednisolone plus ropivacaine with saline group (treatment group) will consist of 1 ml of 40 mg methylprednisolone plus 15ml of 1% ropivacaine and 14 ml saline.
Drug: Methylprednisolone 40 mg + Ropivacaine + Saline
To infiltrate the study solution, the surgeon will inject the incision site with a 10 cm long, 22-gauge needle before the closing of the incision site. A standard volume of 10 ml in each level will be injected, based on the study by Milligan et al., with a total of 5ml study solution injected laterally into the erector spinae muscle and 5 ml subcutaneously along both margins of the incision. This standardization will be on the basis of the number of levels to be treated, and will be consistent in each patient. The depth of penetration will include the subcutaneous tissues, paravertebral muscles, along with the deep muscles surrounding the spinous process, lamina, transverse process and facet joints; the epidural space and intrathecal space will be spared. The local infiltration solution in the treatment group will consist of a total of 30 ml study solution, containing 1 ml of 40 mg methylprednisolone plus 15ml of 1% ropivacaine and 14 ml saline.
Active Comparator: ropivacaine + saline
The local infiltration solution in the ropivacaine plus saline group (control group) will consist of 15 ml of 1% ropivacaine and 15ml saline.
Drug: Ropivacaine + Saline
To infiltrate the study solution, the surgeon will inject the incision site with a 10 cm long, 22-gauge needle before the closing of the incision site. A standard volume of 10 ml in each level will be injected, based on the study by Milligan et al., with a total of 5ml study solution injected laterally into the erector spinae muscle and 5 ml subcutaneously along both margins of the incision. This standardization will be on the basis of the number of levels to be treated, and will be consistent in each patient. The depth of penetration will include the subcutaneous tissues, paravertebral muscles, along with the deep muscles surrounding the spinous process, lamina, transverse process and facet joints; the epidural space and intrathecal space will be spared. The local infiltration solution in the control group will consist of a total of 30 ml study solution, containing 15 ml of 1% ropivacaine and 15ml saline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome will be the cumulative sufentanil dose during the 48 hours after surgery via the PCA device.
Time Frame: Within 48 hours after the surgery
All participates will receive an electronic intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Participates will be advised to push the analgesic demand button if they feel pain.
Within 48 hours after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Score
Time Frame: 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after surgery
Pain will be assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS): VAS at movement and VAS at rest in which scores (0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most severe pain imaginable, a higher score means worse pain)
2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after surgery
Cumulative sufentanil dose for four separate periods
Time Frame: 0-4, 4-8, 8-24, and 24-48 hours
The cumulative sufentanil dose for four separate periods (0-4, 4-8, 8-24, and 24-48 hours), a total press count including both valid and invalid presses. ( a higher cumulative sufentanil dose means worse pain)
0-4, 4-8, 8-24, and 24-48 hours
First analgesia demand on the PCA device
Time Frame: Within 48 hours postoperatively
The time from the end of the surgery to the first administration of analgesia via the PCA device ( a faster analgesia demand means worse pain)
Within 48 hours postoperatively
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: At 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks postoperatively
Patient Satisfaction Score (PSS) used in this study comprises of points 1-4: 1- Surgery met my expectations; 2- I did not improve as much as I had hoped but I would undergo the same operation for the same results; 3- Surgery helped but I would not undergo the same operation for the same outcome; 4- I am the same or worse as compared to before surgery; ( a higher score means worse pain)
At 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks postoperatively
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Time Frame: 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) will be measured using an ordinal scale, with 0 - no nausea; 1 - mild nausea not requiring treatment; 2 - nausea requiring treatment; 3 - vomiting ( a higher score means worse outcome)
2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours after surgery
Ramsay Sedation Scale
Time Frame: 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours after surgery
Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) will be measured using a 6-point scale to assess sedation levels, with 1 indicating agitated, anxious; 2 - cooperative; 3 - only responds to commands; 4 - strong response to glabellar tapping or noisy stimulants; 5 - weak response to glabellar tapping or noisy stimulants; 6 - no response ( a higher score means worse outcome)
2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours after surgery
The World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks after surgery
The World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) scores will be used to obtain scores for four domains related to quality of life: physical health (7 items), psychological (6 items), social relationships (3 items) and environment (8 items). It will also include two stand-alone questions on overall quality of life and satisfaction with health. Each question will be rated on a scale of 1-5 with higher scores signifying better quality of life.
4 weeks after surgery
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: Preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively
Functional disability will be assessed preoperatively and at 4 weeks after surgery using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It will include 10 questions about pain and activities of daily living. Each item will have five response categories from no pain related disability (0), to the worst possible pain related disability (100) ( a higher score means worse pain)
Preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively
Patient Scar Assessment and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks postoperatively
Patient Scar Assessment and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), comprised of subjective symptoms of pain and pruritus, such as vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion will be assessed at 1 month postoperatively; 0 represents normal skin and 10 represents worse outcome
4 weeks postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 6, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY 2019-112-02-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Methylprednisolone 40 mg + Ropivacaine + Saline

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings