Can Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel be an Alternative in Gingival Phenotype Modification?
Can Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel be an Alternative to Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft Technique in Gingival Phenotype Modification? A Comparative Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Hacettepe University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- presence of at least two anterior mandibular teeth with keratinized tissue height≤1 mm with gingival thickness ≤1mm
- presence of at least two recession type-1 recessions at mandibular anterior teeth and at least one recession with recession depth ≥2 mm,
- aged between 18-60.
Exclusion Criteria:
- unstable endodontic conditions or presence of any restoration/abrasion,
- tooth mobility, any surgical history or gingival enlargement in the area,
- smoking or alcohol use,
- uncontrolled systemic disease, pregnancy or use of drugs known to affect gingival conditions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: modified coronally advanced tunnel technique
Initial sulcular incisions and flap separation were then carried out with tunnel knives.
Dissection was extended at least 8 mm apically to the mucogingival junction and the muscle attachments were removed with curettes so that the flap could be moved in a coronal direction without tension.
Interdental papillae were undermined to prepare the bed for connective tissue graft placement.
Connective tissue graft was then inserted under the tunnel at the sites of recession and retracted laterally by sutures towards each end of the tunnel.
After connective tissue graft positioning, the flap was gently stretched coronally to obtain passive flap closure.
The exposed connective tissue was covered by connecting the adjacent flap margins with additional sutures.
|
Connective tissue graft placed under the prepared tunnel
|
|
Active Comparator: epithelialized free gingival graft
A partial-thickness flap was elevated (blade #15c) with horizontal incisions at the cemento-enamel junction level of the adjacent teeth.
Then, two vertical incisions extending to the apical were made from two ends of the horizontal incision.
The epithelium in the framed region was removed with a scalpel and the underlying connective tissue was exposed.
To achieve the best vascularization from the recipient site, bed preparation was completed with a split-thickness horizontal incision that joins the vertical incisions in the apical region.
|
The Epithelialized free gingival graft placed on the prepared bed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gingival Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline
|
GT, measured at the midpoint location between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction, using an endodontic spreader (#25 endodontic spreader, 25 mm; D-perfect, Shenzhen, China).
|
Baseline
|
|
Gingival Thickness (GT)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
GT, measured at the mid-point location between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction, using an endodontic spreader (#25 endodontic spreader, 25 mm; D-perfect, Shenzhen, China).
|
6th week
|
|
Gingival Thickness (GT)
Time Frame: 6th month
|
GT, measured at the mid-point location between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction, using an endodontic spreader (#25 endodontic spreader, 25 mm; D-perfect, Shenzhen, China).
|
6th month
|
|
Gingival Thickness (GT)
Time Frame: 12th month
|
GT, measured at the mid-point location between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction, using an endodontic spreader (#25 endodontic spreader, 25 mm; D-perfect, Shenzhen, China).
|
12th month
|
|
Keratinized Tissue Height (KTH)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
KTH, measured from gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ).
|
Baseline
|
|
Keratinized Tissue Height (KTH)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
KTH, measured from gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ).
|
6th week
|
|
Keratinized Tissue Height (KTH)
Time Frame: 6th month
|
KTH, measured from gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ).
|
6th month
|
|
Keratinized Tissue Height (KTH)
Time Frame: 12th month.
|
KTH, measured from gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ).
|
12th month.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recession Depth (RD)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
RD, measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical extension of the gingival margin.
|
Baseline
|
|
Recession Depth (RD)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
RD, measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical extension of the gingival margin.
|
6th week
|
|
Recession Depth (RD)
Time Frame: 6th month
|
RD, measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical extension of the gingival margin.
|
6th month
|
|
Recession Depth (RD)
Time Frame: 12th month.
|
RD, measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical extension of the gingival margin.
|
12th month.
|
|
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Recession width (RW), the distance between the mesial gingival margin and the distal gingival margin of the tooth measured from the widest point of the recession.
|
Baseline
|
|
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Recession width (RW), the distance between the mesial gingival margin and the distal gingival margin of the tooth measured from the widest point of the recession.
|
6th week
|
|
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: 6th month
|
Recession width (RW), the distance between the mesial gingival margin and the distal gingival margin of the tooth measured from the widest point of the recession.
|
6th month
|
|
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: 12th month.
|
Recession width (RW), the distance between the mesial gingival margin and the distal gingival margin of the tooth measured from the widest point of the recession.
|
12th month.
|
|
Probing pocket depth (PD)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Probing pocket depth (PD), measured from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
Baseline
|
|
Probing pocket depth (PD)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Probing pocket depth (PD), measured from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
6th week
|
|
Probing pocket depth (PD)
Time Frame: 6th month
|
Probing pocket depth (PD), measured from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
6th month
|
|
Probing pocket depth (PD)
Time Frame: 12th month.
|
Probing pocket depth (PD), measured from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
12th month.
|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL), measured from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
Baseline
|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL), measured from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
6th week
|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6th month
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL), measured from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
6th month
|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: 12th month
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL), measured from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
|
12th month
|
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC), GT change (GTC), root coverage, clinical attachment gain (CAG) were calculated in millimeters and percentages.
|
Baseline
|
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC), GT change (GTC), root coverage, clinical attachment gain (CAG) were calculated in millimeters and percentages.
|
6th week
|
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC)
Time Frame: 6th month
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC), GT change (GTC), root coverage, clinical attachment gain (CAG) were calculated in millimeters and percentages.
|
6th month
|
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC)
Time Frame: 12th month
|
Keratinized tissue change (KTC), GT change (GTC), root coverage, clinical attachment gain (CAG) were calculated in millimeters and percentages.
|
12th month
|
|
Wound healing index (WHI)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Wound healing index (WHI) was recorded two-weeks after surgery.
The wound surface was visually inspected and the soft tissue healing was defined as 'uneventful' (score 1), 'slightly disturbed' (score 2) or 'poor' (score 3) based on the presence and severity of the items including patient discomfort, erythema, edema, suppuration and flap dehiscence.
|
6th week
|
|
Tissue appearance (TA)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Tissue appearance (TA) was evaluated by asking the patients to score the consistency, contour, color match, keloid formation degree and contiguity of their treated sites at T2.
The scores were collected as points, shown in parentheses, by asking the consistency as firm (1p) or spongy (0p); contour as presence (2p) or absence (0p) of knife-edged and scalloped gingival margin; color match as excellent (3p), good (2p), adequate (1p) or unsatisfactory (0p); keloid formation degree as absent (1p) or present (0p); contiguity as the presence (-1p) or absence (0p) of each perceptible incision mark.
|
6th week
|
|
Dentine hypersensitivity (DH)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) was evaluated with air evaporative stimulus method at baseline and T2.
After placement of finger(s) for preserving the nearby teeth, the recession sites were subjected to evaporative stimulus comprised of 1-second air blast from 1 to 3 mm distance by using the air spray at 40-65 psi pressure and 19±50C.
After application, the patients were requested to give a score to their DH between 0 (=no pain) and 10 (=extreme pain).
|
6th week
|
|
Patient expectations (PE)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Patient expectations (PE) were evaluated by requesting from the patients to rate their treatment results at T2, as satisfactory or not, in terms of appearance, experience and obtained root coverage.
|
6th week
|
|
Aesthetics (A)
Time Frame: 6th week
|
Aesthetics (A) was evaluated by the patient at T1 by rating its level as excellent, good, fair or poor.
|
6th week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Phenotype Modification
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gingival Phenotype
-
NCT06060119Not yet recruitingGingival Phenotype
-
NCT07570290Not yet recruitingGingival Phenotype Assessment
-
NCT05706480CompletedGingival Phenotype
-
NCT07349056Not yet recruitingRecession, Gingival | Dental Surgery | Buccal Bone Thickness | Gingival Phenotype | Gingival Biotype
-
NCT07368621RecruitingSoft Tissue Thickness Around Delayed Implants in Patients With Thin Gingival Phenotype
-
NCT07130266CompletedPeriodontitis | Gingival Recession | Hyaluronic Acid | Open Flap Debridement | Gingival Phenotype
-
NCT07097714RecruitingGingival Recession | Dental Crowding | Thin Phenotype
-
NCT06981871Not yet recruiting
-
NCT00981929TerminatedCytochrome P450 Phenotype and Genotype Metrics
-
NCT01118858CompletedDrug Metabolism Phenotype
Clinical Trials on Modified coronally advanced tunnel technique
-
NCT06509165CompletedGingival Recession
-
NCT06433986Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06650072Not yet recruitingGingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT03328442Unknown
-
NCT06504329Completed
-
NCT06065774CompletedGingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT07200258Recruiting
-
NCT07590960Not yet recruitingGingival Recession | Mucogingival Deformity - Insufficient Keratinized Tissue
-
NCT06272006Completed
-
NCT03258996CompletedGingival Recessions