Efficacy of PRGF Supplementation After TMJ Arthrocentesis in Patients With TMJ Osteoarthritis

February 20, 2025 updated by: University of Florida

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Growth Factor (PRGF) Supplementation Compared to Steroid Supplementation After Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Arthrocentesis in Female Patients With TMJ Osteoarthritis (OA)

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) affects articulating tissues secondary to inflammation resulting in intracapsular pain. This prospective, double-blind randomized clinical trial will evaluate the relative efficacy of TMJ arthrocentesis with a supplementation of platelet-rich growth factors (PRGF) compared to TMJ arthrocentesis with a steroid supplementation (a known effective therapy) for patients with TMJ OA.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are musculoskeletal disorders that are commonly encountered, with pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and jaw closing muscles. Pain that involves the temporomandibular joint includes inflammatory pathologies such as arthritides, painful disk displacements and many times have an overlay of psychosocial comorbidities due to the uncontrolled pain. TMJ osteoarthritis is an intracapsular condition affecting the temporomandibular joint and presents with remodeling of the TMJ articulating tissues including the condyle and articular eminence secondary to inflammation resulting in intracapsular pain. There is a paucity of information regarding the relative effectiveness of different therapies for the treatment of patients with TMJ osteoarthritis. The identification of the least invasive and most efficacious therapy is vital to proper management of these patients with temporomandibular joint pain and disability. The purpose of this study is to establish the relative efficacy of TMJ arthrocentesis with steroid supplementation (a known effective therapy) compared to TMJ arthrocentesis with a supplement of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) for patients with TMJ osteoarthritis. Plasma rich in growth factors is isolated from the patient's own blood and injected into the temporomandibular joint to activate stem cells that may restore some of the articulating tissues that were lost during degeneration changes within the joint secondary to osteoarthritis. Pain and disability will be assessed using standard pain and physical measures that are recorded before and after treatment. Patients enrolled into the study will be examined and treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty/Resident clinic. At the first appointment, they will be examined following standard procedures (medical history, physical exam, imaging by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT)) to determine their diagnosis(es) and if they would potentially benefit from the TMJ arthrocentesis procedure. If the patient meets the inclusion criteria for the study and with their informed consent on the day of their TMJ arthrocentesis procedure, they will be required to have a pregnancy test if below age 60 and complete a questionnaire about their physical and pain symptoms and undergo a standardized clinical exam. The patients will then undergo the standard clinical protocol for TMJ arthrocentesis followed by either a 2 cc steroid/bupivacaine hydrochloride supplementation (standard treatment group) or a 2 cc PRGF supplementation (experimental group) into the TMJ. Follow-up appointments will be conducted at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months when the pain VAS measures and a clinical exam will be assessed. If patients have not experienced improvement in their primary outcome measure (TMJ pain) at the 3 month evaluation, the patient will have a second TMJ arthrocentesis procedure that will be supplemented with the alternative medication/growth factors (steroid or PRGF) using a cross-over design. Data from these patients will be analyzed separately from patients that complete the six month study. Also at 6 months, a second CBCT image of the temporomandibular joints will be obtained to determine the extent of bone remodeling within the TMJ. The results of this study should provide new information on the efficacy of PRGF supplementation for management of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • 40 - 80 years of age
  • Unilateral or bilateral TMJ arthralgia
  • Osteoarthritis diagnosis according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD)
  • TMJ sounds (crepitus or click or both)
  • Mild-moderate masticatory muscle myalgia
  • History of non-surgical treatment for at least 6 weeks including such modalities as appliance therapy, NSAID therapy or physical modalities without resolution of pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to sedation including pregnancy or medical history
  • Rheumatologic disorders causing arthritis of the temporomandibular joint (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis)
  • History of previous TMJ procedure including arthrocentesis, arthroscopy or arthrotomy
  • History of steroid injection in TMJ
  • TMJ pain greater than five years
  • History of narcotic drug use on a scheduled basis
  • Current active infection
  • Fibromyalgia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PRGF Arm
The PRGF experimental group will have two cc of PRGF infused into the upper joint space after the TMJ arthrocentesis procedure.
Biological: Plasma Rich in Growth Factor (PRGF) Supplementation
After rinsing the joint, the TMJ will be injected with blood plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF). PRGF supplementation which is an autologous platelet-enriched plasma obtained from patient's own blood, which after activation with calcium chloride allows the release of a pool of biologically active proteins that influence and promote a range of biological processes.
Active Comparator: Steroid Arm
Two cc containing 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide with 5 mg bupivacaine will be infused into the upper joint space after the TMJ arthrocentesis procedure.
Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide
After rinsing the joint, the TMJ will be injected with 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide with 5 mg bupivacaine.
Other Names:
  • Kenalog

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Rating
Time Frame: Three Months
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale that has a range of 0-100 and is represented as a 100 mm line. On this scale, 0 is represented as "no pain" and 100 is represented as "the most intense pain imaginable". Pain is measured by having the subject place a line bisecting a 100 mm line to represent the pain level and a numerical rating is obtained by measuring the distance, in mm, from the zero-pain anchor (left side of scale represented by 0 pain).
Three Months
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Rating
Time Frame: Six Months
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale that has a range of 0-100 and is represented as a 100 mm line. On this scale, 0 is represented as "no pain" and 100 is represented as "the most intense pain imaginable". Pain is measured by having the subject place a line bisecting a 100 mm line to represent the pain level and a numerical rating is obtained by measuring the distance, in mm, from the zero-pain anchor (left side of scale represented by 0 pain).
Six Months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chewing Pain Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale that has a range of 0-100 and is represented as a 100 mm line. On this scale, 0 is represented as "no pain" and 100 is represented as "the most intense pain imaginable". Pain is measured by having the subject place a line bisecting a 100 mm line to represent the pain level and a numerical rating is obtained by measuring the distance, in mm, from the zero-pain anchor (left side of scale represented by 0 pain).
Baseline
Chewing Pain Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Six Months
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale that has a range of 0-100 and is represented as a 100 mm line. On this scale, 0 is represented as "no pain" and 100 is represented as "the most intense pain imaginable". Pain is measured by having the subject place a line bisecting a 100 mm line to represent the pain level and a numerical rating is obtained by measuring the distance, in mm, from the zero-pain anchor (left side of scale represented by 0 pain).
Six Months
Temporomandibular Joint Crepitus
Time Frame: Baseline
Presence of multiple, distinct joint sounds (crepitus).
Baseline
Temporomandibular Joint Crepitus
Time Frame: Six Months
Presence of multiple, distinct joint sounds (crepitus).
Six Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Charles G. Widmer, DDS, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 21, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB202000689-A
  • OCR40106 (Other Identifier: UF OnCore)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings