Frailty Syndrome of Post-cancer Treatment Eldery Patients (PANACEE)

June 3, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Impact of Exercise and Nutritional Support on the Frailty Syndrome of Eldery Patients in Phase of Post-cancer Treatment

Decrease the prevalence of frailty syndrome in individuals with complete response of cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Grenoble, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de GRENOBLE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • in complete remission from cancer (all type of cancer)
  • have a frailty syndrome (positive GFST score)
  • ability to provide signed informed consent
  • be affiliated with social security or beneficiary of such a scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient with active cancer or any other pathology affecting the prognosis at 5 years
  • currently participating or having participated in the month preceding inclusion in another interventional clinical research that may impact the study. This impact is left to the investigator discretion
  • subjects referred to articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of CSP (corresponds to all protected persons: person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, person subject to legal protection measure)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: exercise and nutritional support
exercise and nutritional support program during an active support phase (0 to 6 months) followed by an empowerment phase (from 6 to 12 months)
Combination product: exercise and nutritional support
exercise and nutritional support program during an active support phase (0 to 6 months) followed by an empowerment phase (from 6 to 12 months)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the prevalence of frailty syndrome in individuals with complete response of cancer
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
evolution of individual frailty during a multimodal intervention (physical and nutritional activity) according to the Fried's criteria
0, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluation of predicitive variables of frailty syndrome reversion
Time Frame: Month 0, 6 and 12
The criterion determining the frail status is the Fried score classified into 3 categories: not frail; pre-frail; frail. A change from frail to pre-frail or to not frail will be considered as an improvement. Measurements of the Frailty score and other markers on nutrition and APA will be carried out at month 0 (basic measurements), then measured at month 6 (end of APA and nutritionist support) and at month12 (6 months after empowerment). All of health markers collected during the basic assessment, changes in parameters (month 6) and compliance with APA and nutrition support (from Month 1 to Month 6 then between Month 6 and Month 12) will be tested as variables potentially predictive of an improvement in the frailty syndrome.
Month 0, 6 and 12
Correlations between physical performance and frailty syndrome and their evolutions
Time Frame: Month 0, 6 and 12
measurement of VO2peak + ventilatory thresholds measured in a stress test, muscle strength/endurance (number of chair raises for 30 seconds), walking speed (10-meter walking test, 6-minute walk test), balance (Tinette score), coordination (functional mobility test), cardio-respiratory endurance (heart rate measurement in relation to pedaling power)
Month 0, 6 and 12
Change from baseline nutritional status during nutritionist support (month 3 and 6) and at the end of empowerment (month 12)
Time Frame: Month 0, 3, 6 and 12
nutritional parameters measured at each time frame for weight, VAS appetite score, MNA score, nutritional calculation (food survey and self-questionnaire), bio impedancemetry and biomarkers of nutrition (levels of albumin, prealbumin, C reactive protein, CBC, liver and kidney function)
Month 0, 3, 6 and 12
Measure adherence to APA interventions and exercise practices
Time Frame: between month 1 to 6 and between month 6 to 12
Adherence to APA support program throughout the study will be evaluated by measurements and sum of multiple parameters: number of sessions recorded on the heart rate monitor, average energy expenditure (in kcal) measured by the heart rate monitor,number of sets of exercises performed relative to the number of exercises recommended for muscle strengthening recorded in the patient notebook, CESS scale to assess beliefs about cancer patients and physical activity
between month 1 to 6 and between month 6 to 12
Estimation of adherence to nutritional interventions
Time Frame: Month 6 and 12
comparison between active support phase and empowerment phase with food self-questionnaire
Month 6 and 12
Measure the durability of long-term activities
Time Frame: Month 6 and 12
number of monthly patient connections to heart rate monitor; evaluation of the completion of patient notebook
Month 6 and 12
Measure health related quality of life on mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression
Time Frame: Month 0, 6 and 12
Assessment of quality of life with EQ-5D questionnaire by comparison to the basal state (M0).
Month 0, 6 and 12
Sociological study on motivation: evaluation of the perception and experience of treating patients
Time Frame: Month 6 and 12
a series of qualitative interviews with a panel of 15 patients, during 2 interview sessions: 1 after support phase and 1 at the end of autonomy phase. Interview will collect past/current socio-professional life, socialization in physical activity and nutrition.
Month 6 and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Grenoble

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gaëtan Gavazzi, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 38RC19.144

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on exercise and nutritional support

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings