Effects of a Health Intervention on Hypoglycemic Coping : a Pilot Study

April 22, 2024 updated by: Yating Liu

Construction and Preliminary Verification of interventionImpact of an IMB Theory-based Health Education Intervention on Hypoglycemic Coping in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: a Pilot Study

From August 2023 to January 2024, 100 patients with type 2 diabetes who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected from the endocrinology department of The purpose of this study was to construct a hypoglycemia coping intervention program for type 2 diabetic patients based on the IMB theory and to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effects of the program.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this study, eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into an intervention group (health education based on IMB theory given on top of regular diabetes health education) and a control group (regular diabetes health education), with a 4-week intervention period and a 8-week follow-up period, for a total of 12 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • 未选择
      • Yangzhou, 未选择, China
        • Ya ting Liu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet the 2018 ADA medical standards for Diabetes diagnosis and treatment, are diagnosed with T2DM and use insulin or sulfonylurea drugs;
  • Duration of diabetes mellitus ≥1 year
  • Age ≥18 years old;
  • A history of hypoglycemia in the past 6 months;
  • Type 2 diabetes patients with hypoglycemia coping style questionnaire inclination, avoidance, compromise;
  • Good communication and language skills;
  • Have a smartphone and can use it;
  • Voluntary participation in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with type 1 diabetes;
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes combined with serious complications;
  • Patients who have recently or are participating in other similar studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: intervention group
Based on IMB Theory of Health Education A hypoglycemia coping intervention program based on IMB theory was implemented on top of the control group.
Behavioral: Impact of an IMB theory-based health education intervention on hypoglycemic coping in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study
Based on IMB health education theory Questionnaire collection, face-to-face interview, and manual interpretation on the first day of admission; questionnaire collection, face-to-face interview, and manual interpretation on the first day of admission; hypoglycemia knowledge promotion on the second day; Peer experience sharing on the third day; access to WeChat group and knowledge pushing on the fourth day; hypoglycemia-related lectures and practical teaching on the fifth day, face-to-face teaching and development of blood glucose management plan. Hypoglycemia knowledge contest on the day before discharge; One week, two weeks and three weeks after discharge for WeChat push or phone call; WeChat push, phone call and questionnaire.
No Intervention: the control group
General diabetes health education Patients were provided with regular medication guidance, dietary guidance, exercise guidance and popularization of related diabetes knowledge; regular daily blood glucose testing and recording; and timely answers to patients' clinical problems and psychological support.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The hypoglycemic coping style
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
The scale consists of 16 entries in 3 dimensions, which in this study are confrontation (entries 1, 6, 8, 11, 12, 15), avoidance (entries 2, 5, 7, 10, 13, 16), and submission (entries 3, 4, 9, 14), and each of the entries is rated on a Likert's 5 scale ranging from 0-4, with higher scores on the dimensions indicating a greater tendency toward this type of coping, and the scale's total Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.821.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hypoglycemic fear behavioral
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Hypoglycemia fear-behavior scale (HFS-BS) consists of 19 entries and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5, with total scores ranging from 15 to 95, with the higher scores indicating that the patients' hypoglycemia fear-behavior is more pronounced, and the higher the level of fear of hypoglycemia. The higher the score, the more obvious the change in the patient's hypoglycemic fear behavior and the higher the degree of hypoglycemic fear.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Hypoglycemia fear worry
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Hypoglycemia fear survey-worry scale (HFS-WS) was used to assess the patients' feelings about hypoglycemia in the past six months. The scale has 13 entries, and adopts Likert's 5-point scale, with scores ranging from 0-4 from the lowest to the highest, and the total score ranging from 0 to 52, with the higher the score, the more fearful the patients are about hypoglycemia.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Level of health information access behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.866, and a Likert 5-point scale was used, and a standardized score of the scale score (Index Score=(actual total score/possible highest score)*100%) of greater than 50% was considered moderately high. Higher scores represent higher levels of health information acquisition behavior.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Level of health beliefs
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
The questionnaire consisted of 20 items in 5 latitudes, mainly for the necessity of diabetes treatment, benefits, harms, hazards of diabetes, and motivation to maintain the health of the organism, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.89, and the questionnaire was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with 8 to 14 being inverse scores, and the higher the total score indicated that the patient's beliefs about health were stronger.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
Level of diabetes knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention
The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.909, and the factor rotation analysis extracted six main factors explaining basic knowledge , dietary knowledge, exercise knowledge, self-monitoring knowledge, medication knowledge and complication knowledge. The variance explained by individual factors was above 7%, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.004%, indicating that the questionnaire had good internal consistency. The evaluation standard of the questionnaire was 1 point for a correct answer, 0 point for an incorrect or unclear answer, and the cumulative score of the 34 items was added to the total knowledge score, and the higher the score, the more knowledge about diabetes mellitus was acquired.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yating Liu

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ya T Liu, Bachelor, Yangzhou University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • YZUHL20220047

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoglycemia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings