Immunogenomic Analyses of Pediatric Catatonia

November 12, 2024 updated by: Aaron Besterman, Rady Pediatric Genomics & Systems Medicine Institute
Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine seeks to understand the genomes and immune systems in 40 children and adolescents who are admitted to Rady Children's Hospital San Diego with a catatonia diagnosis. Cutting-edge genome and protein sequencing technology will be used to better understand how immunological and genetic assessments may improve the ability to identify the cause of catatonia and impact care. The investigator also hopes to identify new genetic and/or autoimmune causes of catatonia that may inform new treatment for future patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Catatonia is a complex condition that affects children's behavior, movement, and emotions. It can be caused by various underlying health issues, such as genetic disorders or problems with the immune system. Identifying these underlying causes is crucial for providing the best care and treatment to affected children. In this study, the investigators aim to compare the effectiveness of traditional medical tests with a more advanced approach that includes genetic testing and immune system screening in finding the underlying causes of catatonia in children. The investigators will compare two groups of children with catatonia. One group will be identified from hospital records and will have undergone standard medical tests to find the cause of their catatonia. The other group will be a new set of patients who will receive both standard medical tests and additional advanced testing, including genome sequencing (a technique that reads the entire genetic code) and screening for antibodies that attack the brain. The investigators will use a statistical method called propensity score matching to make sure that the two groups are as similar as possible in terms of age, sex, and other relevant factors. This will help the investigators to fairly compare the effectiveness of the two approaches in identifying the underlying causes of catatonia. The investigators expect that combining standard medical tests with genome sequencing and autoantibody screening will be more effective in finding the underlying causes of catatonia in children compared to using standard medical tests alone. This could lead to more accurate diagnoses and more targeted treatments for children with catatonia, helping them to recover more quickly and improving their quality of life. If this study shows that the advanced testing approach is more effective in finding the underlying causes of catatonia, this could change the way doctors approach the diagnosis and treatment of this complex condition. In turn, this could lead to more accurate diagnoses, tailored treatments, and improved outcomes for children with catatonia and their families.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individual in whom one of the following criteria is met:

    1. Child/adolescent Ages 0-17 (2) with a diagnosis of catatonia.

      OR

    2. Biological parents of child/adolescent enrolled in this study for the purposes of reflex testing. Family members are eligible for participation in this study if they are presumed to be genetically related to a patient participant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child/adolescents patients who do not meet any of the inclusion criteria, or those who:

    1. Already received any prior whole genome sequencing or exome sequencing.
    2. Unable to approach the family or patient for enrollment.
    3. Unable to obtain informed consent.

    4. Family members are ineligible for participation in this study if:

      1. They are known to not be genetically related to the child/adolescent patient participant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Enrollees - WGS
These participants will be subject to whole genome sequencing and Phage ImmunoPrecipiation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) to identify genetic changes and novel antibodies associated with catatonia.
Genetic: Genetic: Genomic sequencing and molecular diagnostic results, if any.
Genomic sequencing results may be used for diagnosis and treatment of participants.
Diagnostic test: Phage display ImmunoPrecipiation Sequencing (PhIP-Seq)
Whole Proteome programmable phage display immunoprecipitation sequencing will be used to diagnose known and novel autoantibodies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic rate of brain reactive autoantibodies
Time Frame: 2 years
Diagnostic rate of brain reactive autoantibodies via genomic and whole human proteome programmable phage display immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq)
2 years
Diagnostic rate of whole genome sequencing
Time Frame: 2 years
Evaluate the impact of whole genome sequencing on diagnostic yield in pediatric catatonia, compared to standard medical workup.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rady Pediatric Genomics & Systems Medicine Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Besterman, MD, Rady Pediatric Genomics & Systems Medicine Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 810014
  • 314882-00001 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Brain and Behavior Research Foundation)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings