Efficacy and Safety of Reperfusion Therapy for Minor Ischemic Stroke in China

December 23, 2025 updated by: Jinsheng Zeng, MD, PhD, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Efficacy and Safety of Reperfusion Therapy for Minor Ischemic Stroke in China: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Acute ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke in China, accounting for 69.6% -72.8% of new strokes. In recent years, the proportion of mild stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5 points) has gradually increased, exceeding 50%, and the recurrence rate of stroke within one year is 13.2%, with a mortality rate of 6.3%, and 4% -10% may experience early deterioration of neurological function within 72 hours. At present, the main treatment for mild ischemic stroke is antiplatelet aggregation or anticoagulation drugs, but there are still 10% -20% of patients with residual neurological disability. There is still controversy over whether acute reperfusion therapy (including intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular intervention therapy) can improve the prognosis of such patients. In addition, it has been confirmed that beyond the time window thrombolysis is effective for selected ischemic stroke patients, but it is urgent to clarify whether mild ischemic stroke patients can benefit from receiving beyond the time window thrombolysis. Due to the limited evidence and inconsistent conclusions on the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy in patients with mild stroke, it is urgent to have a deeper understanding of the current status of reperfusion therapy for mild ischemic stroke in China based on real clinical data, and systematically compare the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy (including intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular intervention therapy) with standard drug therapy for this type of patient. This project plans to conduct a nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate the differences in excellent neurological function prognosis (mRS ≤ 1) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate among patients with mild ischemic stroke who receive reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis ± endovascular intervention therapy) compared to standard drug therapy at 90 days, in order to guide accurate clinical decision-making. The research results have significant implications for improving the prognosis of patients with mild ischemic stroke, and will also lay an important foundation for future large-scale randomized controlled studies to explore the optimal treatment strategies for mild stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jinsheng Zeng, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with minor ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5) within 24h from onset

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >18 year
  2. Pre-stroke mRS ≤1
  3. Diagnosis of ischemic stroke, confirmed by imaging (CT or MRI)
  4. Stroke onset or last seen well (LSW) to visit ≤ 24h
  5. NIHSS ≤ 5
  6. Receive standard medication or IVT (TNK or rtPA) ± EVT, or EVT alone; for IVT beyond standard time window, initiation of treatment must occur within 4.5-24h of last seen well and ASPECTs≥7 or Perfusion lesion-ischemic core mismatch (ischemic core volume <70mL, mismatch rate >1.2, mismatch volume >10mL or mismatch between the presence of an abnormal signal on DWI and no visible signal change on FLAIR)
  7. Patients or their eligible surrogates provided informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  2. Patients who already received reperfusion therapy for the current stroke before arriving at the hospital
  3. Participation in another interventional clinical trial that could interfere with the outcomes of this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Reperfusion therapy cohort
intravenous thrombolysis ± endovascular therapy, endovascular therapy alone
Standard of care cohort
Recommended by guidelines for secondary stroke prevention, e.g. dual/mono antiplatelet, antihypertensive or lipid-lowing therapy, et al

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of modified Rankin scale score 0-1
Time Frame: Day 90
Modified Rankin Scale score ranges from 0 to 6, and lower score means better functional independence.
Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Modified Rankin Scale score 0-2
Time Frame: Day 90
Modified Rankin Scale score ranges from 0 to 6, and lower score means better functional independence.
Day 90
Proportion of Modified Rankin Scale score 0-3
Time Frame: Day 90
Modified Rankin Scale score ranges from 0 to 6, and lower score means better functional independence.
Day 90
Ordinal Modified Rankin Scale score
Time Frame: Day 90
Modified Rankin Scale score ranges from 0 to 6, and lower score means better functional independence.
Day 90
Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: Hour 24
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ranges from 0 to 42, and higher score indicates more severe neurologic deficits.
Hour 24
Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: Hour 72
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ranges from 0 to 42, and higher score indicates more severe neurologic deficits.
Hour 72
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: Day 7 or discharge (whichever comes first)
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ranges from 0 to 42, and higher score indicates more severe neurologic deficits.
Day 7 or discharge (whichever comes first)
Barthel Index score
Time Frame: Day 90
Barthel Index ranges from 0 to 100, and higher score means more functional independence.
Day 90
Proportion of patients with door-to-needle time < 60 minutes
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
immediately after the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 90
Day 90
Proportion of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ECASS III)
Time Frame: Day 7 or discharge
Day 7 or discharge
Proportion of moderate or severe systemic bleeding (The GUSTO criteria)
Time Frame: Day 7 or discharge
Day 7 or discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jinsheng Zeng, MD, PhD, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RERISE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Minor Ischemic Stroke

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings