Docetaxel With or Without Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Patients With Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases

October 10, 2012 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Trial of Docetaxel and Imatinib Versus Docetaxel and Placebo in Metastatic Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer (AIPC) With Bone Metastases

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as docetaxel, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Imatinib mesylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking the enzymes necessary for their growth. Combining docetaxel with imatinib mesylate may be effective treatment for androgen-independent prostate cancer and bone metastases.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying docetaxel and imatinib mesylate to see how well they work compared to docetaxel alone in treating patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer and bone metastases.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare time to progression in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer and bone metastases treated with docetaxel with vs without imatinib mesylate.

Secondary

  • Compare the response rates in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
  • Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients are stratified according to hemoglobin (< 11g/dL vs ≥ 11 g/dL), alkaline phosphatase (normal vs elevated), number of prior regimens (0 vs 1 or 2), and ECOG performance score (0 or 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive docetaxel IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and oral imatinib mesylate once daily on days 1-43.
  • Arm II: Patients receive docetaxel as in arm I and oral placebo once daily on days 1-43.

In both arms, courses repeat every 43 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who progress on arm II may cross over to arm I.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 152 patients (76 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009
        • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    • Osseous metastases confirmed by radiography
    • Lytic bone lesions considered for biopsy if there is clinical suspicion of histologic conversion to small cell carcinoma
  • Failed prior hormonal therapy
  • Progressive disease, as evidenced by one of the following:

    • 2 consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of at least 1 ng/mL over 4 weeks
    • Increase of 25% of the product of bidimensional disease or 30% in maximum diameter
    • Increase in number of osseous metastases by bone scan
    • Worsening symptoms attributable to disease progression (e.g., worsening bony pain)
  • PSA ≥ 1 ng/mL
  • Castrate serum testosterone ≤ 50 ng/dL

    • Concurrent luteinizing-hormone releasing-hormone analog required for medically castrated patients
  • No small cell or sarcomatoid prostate cancers
  • No uncontrolled CNS metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • Any age

Performance status

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2

Life expectancy

  • At least 3 months

Hematopoietic

  • Absolute granulocyte count ≥ 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3

Hepatic

  • Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL
  • Aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) ≤ 2 times upper limit of normal
  • No chronic liver disease

Renal

  • Creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min

Cardiovascular

  • No New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • No unstable angina
  • No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
  • No evidence of myocardial ischemia on electrocardiogram
  • No uncontrolled severe hypertension

Pulmonary

  • No oxygen-dependent lung disease

Other

  • HIV negative
  • No concurrent severe infection
  • No contraindication to corticosteroids
  • No uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • No grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy
  • No other malignancy within the past 2 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • No overt psychosis, mental disability, or incompetency that would preclude giving informed consent
  • No history of noncompliance

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • No concurrent immunotherapy

Chemotherapy

  • No prior taxanes
  • No more than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens
  • At least 30 days since prior chemotherapy and recovered
  • No other concurrent chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 4 weeks since prior flutamide or nilutamide*
  • At least 6 weeks since prior bicalutamide* NOTE: *Unless there is evidence of interim disease progression

Radiotherapy

  • At least 90 days since prior strontium chloride Sr 89 or samarium Sm 153 lexidronam pentasodium and recovered
  • At least 30 days since other prior radiotherapy and recovered

Surgery

  • Fully recovered from prior surgery

Other

  • No concurrent ketoconazole
  • No concurrent warfarin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Docetaxel + Imatinib Mesylate
Docetaxel 30 mg/m^2 intravenous over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in 42-day cycles, with daily oral 600 mg imatinib mesylate.
Other Names:
  • taxotere
Other Names:
  • Gleevec
  • STI571
  • Imatinib
  • NSC-716051
Placebo Comparator: Docetaxel + Placebo
Docetaxel 30 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in 42-day cycles, with daily oral placebo.
Other Names:
  • taxotere

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to progression
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 years, or until disease progression
Baseline to 3 years, or until disease progression

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Toxic effects
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Paul Mathew, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Study Chair: Christopher Logothetis, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Mathew P, Thall PF, Johnson MM, et al.: Preliminary results of a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial of weekly docetaxel combined with imatinib in men with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) and bone metastases (BM). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-4562, 232s, 2006.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2004

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2004

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2004

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Docetaxel

3
Subscribe