Post-marketing Study of Cilostazol (Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study 2)

June 9, 2011 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Post-marketing Study of Cilostazol: Study to Confirm Efficacy in Preventing Recurrent Cerebral Infarction in Comparison With Aspirin

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of cilostazol in preventing recurrence of cerebral infarction and the safety of long-term administration of the drug (100 mg, twice daily) in patients with cerebral infarction (excluding cardiogenic cerebral embolism) in a multi-center, double-blind, parallel-group comparison with aspirin (81 mg, once daily).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2800

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with stable medical conditions for 182 days (26 weeks) after occurrence of cerebral infarction
  2. Patients in whom the infarct-related foci was detected by X-ray CT scan or MRI
  3. Patients aged 20 to 80 years (inclusive) at time of consent
  4. Patients with none of the following cardiac diseases that may be associated with cardiogenic cerebral embolism: mitral stenosis, prosthetic heart valve, endocarditis, myocardial infarction within 6 weeks after occurrence, ventricular aneurysm, endocardial thrombosis, mitral valve prolapse (patients less than 45 years of age in whom no other cause was identified), atrial fibrillation, sick sinus syndrome, idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and patent foramen ovale
  5. Patients without asymptomatic cerebral infarction
  6. Patients who have neither undergone nor are scheduled to undergo percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or revascularization for the treatment of cerebral infarction
  7. Patients without severe disturbances/impairments following occurrence of cerebral

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with hemorrhage or bleeding tendency (hemophilia, capillary fragility, intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhage in the digestive tract, hemorrhage in the urinary tract, hemoptysis, and hemorrhage in the vitreous body)
  2. Pregnant, possibly pregnant, or nursing women
  3. Patients with ischemic heart failure
  4. Patients with peptic ulcer
  5. Patients with severer blood disorders
  6. Patients with severe hepatic or renal
  7. Patients with malignant neoplasm or patients who have received any therapy for malignant neoplasm within 5 years prior to entering the study
  8. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to salicylic acid formulations or ingredients of cilostazol tablets
  9. Patients with aspirin asthma (asthma attacks induced by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic agents) or a history of aspirin asthma
  10. Patients who are being treated with ticlopidine hydrochloride
  11. Patients who are participating in another study for an investigational drug
  12. Patients who are otherwise judged inappropriate for inclusion in the study by the investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
cilostazol
oral tablet, 100 mg twice a day and placebo of aspirin once a day, 1 to 5years
Active Comparator: 2
Aspirin
oral tablet, placebo of cilostazol twice a day and 81 mg once a day, 1 to 5 years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numbers of Patients With First Occurence of Stroke
Time Frame: From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [Standard Deviation 16, range 1-59 months])
The endpoint in this measure is a composite endpoint of the first recurrence of cerebral infarction, or occurrence of cerebral haemorrhage or subarachnoid haemorrhage. The evaluation committee, whose members were unaware of patients' treatment assignment, adjudicated all trial endpoints.
From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [Standard Deviation 16, range 1-59 months])

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With First Recurrence of Cerebral Infarction
Time Frame: From start of treatment to end of follow-up period (mean follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
From start of treatment to end of follow-up period (mean follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
Number of Patients With First Occurrence of Ischaemic Cerebrovascular Disease
Time Frame: From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
The endpoint in this measure is a composite endpoint of the first recurrence of cerebral infarction or the first occurrence of transient ischaemic attack. The evaluation committee, whose members were unaware of patients' treatment assignment, adjudicated all trial endpoints.
From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
Number of Deaths From Any Cause
Time Frame: From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
Number of deaths from any cause. The evaluation committee, whose members were unaware of patients' treatment assignment, adjudicated all trial endpoints.
From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
Number of Patients With First Occurrence of a Composite Endpoint of Stroke, Haemorrhagic Events, or Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
The endpoint in this measure is a composite endpoint of the first recurrence of cerebral infarction, or occurrence of cerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, transient ischaemic attack, angina pectris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or haemorrhage requiring hospital admission. The evaluation committee, whose members were unaware of patients' treatment assignment, adjudicated all trial endpoints.
From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With First Occurrence of Haemorrhagic Event
Time Frame: From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])
The endpoint in this measure is a composite endpoint of the first occurrence of cerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage or haemorrhage requiring hospital admission. The evaluation committee, whose members were unaware of patients' treatment assignment, adjudicated all trial endpoints.
From start of treatment to end of follow-up period ( follow-up periods : 29 months [STANDARD DEVIATION 16, range 1-59 months])

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Masahiko Abe, Division of New Product Evaluation and Development

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Infarction

Clinical Trials on Cilostazol

3
Subscribe