A Study to Evaluate RAF265, an Oral Drug Administered to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (CHIR-265-MEL01)

December 11, 2020 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Phase I/II, Open-label, Dose Escalation Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of RAF265 (CHIR-265)Administered Orally to Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety profile, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and maximum tolerated dose of RAF265 in patients with locally advanced and metastatic melanoma.

Phase II portion of study (dose expansion) has been cancelled with Amendment 7 as of Dec 2011.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway plays a prominent role in controlling several key cellular functions including growth, proliferation and survival. B-Raf is a member of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway and is frequently mutated in melanoma resulting in activation of the MAPK pathway. RAF265 is a novel, orally active, small molecule with potent inhibitory activity against B-Raf kinase and additional antiangiogenic activity through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 (VEGFR-2) in non-clinical studies.

The primary objectives of this study are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the safety profile of RAF265 when administered orally to subjects with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma; to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics (PKs) of orally administered RAF265; and to evaluate potential pharmacodynamic effects of RAF265 using tumor biopsies, peripheral blood samples, and tumor imaging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Univ.ofColoradoCancerCenter
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Georgia Regents University Cancer Clinical Research Unit
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center/Johns Hopkins Med. Medical Oncology
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital Dept of Cancer for Melanoma
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute DFCI
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Dept.ofBethIsraelDeaconess(3)
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Health System Dept of Hospital of UnivofPenn
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Dept of Hillman Cancer Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center Dept. of Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009
        • University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center Onc. Dept,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of melanoma, locally advanced AJCC Stage IIIB to metastatic Stage IV
  2. Measurable disease - at least one lesion measured in at least one dimension as ≥ 20 mm with conventional techniques or ≥ 10 mm with spiral computed tomography (CT) scan
  3. ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
  4. No concurrent anticancer or investigational therapy for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment
  5. No major surgery for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant cardiac disease or other significant medical/psychiatric disease
  2. History of primary central nervous system tumor or brain metastases
  3. History of melena, hematemesis, or hemoptysis within the last 3 months
  4. Previous therapy with certain molecularly targeted agents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RAF265 - Arm 1
Patients received 10mg RAF265 as a once weekly dose until progressive disease was confirmed.
A liquid nonaqueous oral formulation. Switched to a tablet formulations with was 60% bioavailable, relative to the liquid at 50mg dose. The liquid dose will be multiplied by a factor of 1.67 to achieve a comparable tablet dose. Tablets are available in 10mg and 50mg strengths.
Experimental: RAF265 - Arm 2
RAF265 is given as a single "PK run-in" dose, a single loading dose on day 1 of cycle 1, followed by once daily maintenance doses.
A liquid nonaqueous oral formulation. Switched to a tablet formulations with was 60% bioavailable, relative to the liquid at 50mg dose. The liquid dose will be multiplied by a factor of 1.67 to achieve a comparable tablet dose. Tablets are available in 10mg and 50mg strengths.
Experimental: RAF265 - Arm 3
Patients were treated with once weekly dosing of RAF265
A liquid nonaqueous oral formulation. Switched to a tablet formulations with was 60% bioavailable, relative to the liquid at 50mg dose. The liquid dose will be multiplied by a factor of 1.67 to achieve a comparable tablet dose. Tablets are available in 10mg and 50mg strengths.
Experimental: RAF265 - Arm 4
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma will utilize a dose close to or at the MTD/RPTD of the liquid formulation that was determined in Arm 2.
A liquid nonaqueous oral formulation. Switched to a tablet formulations with was 60% bioavailable, relative to the liquid at 50mg dose. The liquid dose will be multiplied by a factor of 1.67 to achieve a comparable tablet dose. Tablets are available in 10mg and 50mg strengths.
Experimental: RAF265 - Arm 5
RAF265 was administered as a continuous dose for 2 weeks followed by a dose holiday of 1 week.
A liquid nonaqueous oral formulation. Switched to a tablet formulations with was 60% bioavailable, relative to the liquid at 50mg dose. The liquid dose will be multiplied by a factor of 1.67 to achieve a comparable tablet dose. Tablets are available in 10mg and 50mg strengths.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Maximum tolerated dose
Time Frame: at the end of dose escalation
at the end of dose escalation
Dose limiting toxicities
Time Frame: during the PK run-in phase and first cycle (28 day cycle)
during the PK run-in phase and first cycle (28 day cycle)
Safety profile
Time Frame: throughout the study
throughout the study
Evaluate potential pharmacodynamic effects
Time Frame: throughout the study
throughout the study
Pharmacokinetic profile
Time Frame: throughout the study
throughout the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate whether somatic mutations in BRAF and N-RAS genes are associated with modulation of pharmacodynamic markers and clinical response
Time Frame: throughout the study
throughout the study
Determine the response rate for BRAF mutant patients
Time Frame: Every 2 months
Every 2 months
Determine the recommended phase two dose
Time Frame: at the end of dose escalation
at the end of dose escalation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Melanoma

Clinical Trials on RAF265

3
Subscribe