Cryotherapy and GM-CSF in Treating Patients With Lung Metastases or Primary Lung Cancer

February 18, 2020 updated by: Peter Littrup, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Percutaneous Cryotherapy and Aerosolized GM-CSF for Pulmonary Metastases and Primary Lung Cancer

RATIONALE: Cryotherapy kills tumor cells by freezing them. Giving an injection of GM-CSF before cryotherapy and inhaling GM-CSF after cryotherapy may interfere with the growth of tumor cells and shrink the tumor. Giving cryotherapy together with GM-CSF may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving cryotherapy together with GM-CSF works in treating patients with lung metastases or primary lung cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine whether percutaneous cryotherapy in combination with aerosolized sargramostim (GM-CSF) has any demonstrable immunologic effect in patients with pulmonary metastases or primary lung cancer.
  • Determine whether any systemic immune response is detectable by the combination of cryotherapy as the antigen presentation source and GM-CSF as the immunologic adjuvant.
  • Determine whether low morbidities will be maintained in patients treated with this regimen.
  • Determine whether effective immunization is associated with a drop in CD4+, CD25+, LTP(TGF-β1)+, Tr cells as measured by flow cytometry or ELISPOT assay for TGF-β1-secreting cells.

Secondary

  • Determine clinical response (i.e., tumor control in the dominant masses undergoing cryotherapy or in other metastatic sites) as measured by CT criteria.
  • Determine the toxicity of this regimen in these patients.

OUTLINE: Patients undergo CT-guided core biopsy of a dominant lung mass and placement of at least 2 cryoprobes. Prior to initiating the freeze, patients receive an interstitial injection of sargramostim (GM-CSF) near the tumor. Patients then undergo percutaneous cryotherapy over 2 hours utilizing a freeze-thaw-freeze cycle. Beginning within 3 days of cryotherapy, patients receive aerosolized GM-CSF twice daily for 1 week. Beginning on day 32, patients may elect to undergo a second course of treatment as described above in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients undergo blood and tumor tissue collection at baseline and periodically during study for immunological correlative studies. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from blood samples are analyzed for antigen-specific CD4-positive or CD8-positive T-cell response by flow cytometry or by TGF-β1 ELISPOT assay to measure TGF-β1- secreting cells. Tumor cell lysates extracted from tumor samples are pulsed with autologous dendritic cells and analyzed by ELISPOT assay to measure T-cell reactivity in tumor specimens.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 6 and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201-1379
        • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of 1 of the following:

    • Primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

      • Any stage nonoperative NSCLC or patient refuses surgery
    • Any cancer with pulmonary metastatic disease (including renal cell cancer)

      • Stage IV disease (any T, any N, M1)
  • Must have 1-10 pulmonary or mediastinal masses meeting the following criteria:

    • At least 1 mass is appropriate for 2 sessions of core biopsy and cryotherapy with relatively easy access/low risk in nonoperative patients (or those refusing surgery)
    • The two dominant masses are defined as either the largest and/or those that may cause imminent morbidity from continued local progression, thereby potentially benefiting from thoracic cryotherapy alone
    • Optimal tumor size > 1.0 cm

      • Dominant masses up to 6 cm in diameter may be considered if thorough cryotherapy coverage can be anticipated with minimal additional treatment morbidity
  • Measurable disease, defined as tridimensional measurements of up to 6 different pulmonary or mediastinal masses ≥ 0.5 cm by CT scan
  • No active pleural effusion that could be related to respiratory infection or requires further work-up
  • No untreated and/or unstable brain metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Karnofsky performance status 70-100%
  • Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
  • Granulocyte count ≥ 1,500/mm³
  • Platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm³
  • INR < 1.5 (i.e., normal PT/PTT)
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
  • Bilirubin ≤ 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST ≤ 3 times ULN
  • Satisfactory pulmonary function test as determined by supervising oncologist, thoracic surgeon, or pulmonologist
  • Not pregnant or lactating
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No other active malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix

    • Inactive history of cancer allowed if the patient has been disease-free for > 2 years
  • No serious medical or psychiatric illnesses that would preclude informed consent or limit survival to < 12 wks
  • No uncontrollable cough or inability to lie flat
  • No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
  • No known immunodeficiency state
  • No uncontrolled infection
  • No uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
  • No advance directive that would prevent the investigator from treating the participant in the event of a complication occurring during or after the procedure
  • No medical contraindication or potential problem that would preclude protocol compliance

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • More than 4 weeks since prior biologic therapy
  • More than 4 weeks since prior immunotherapy
  • More than 4 weeks since prior filgrastim (G-CSF) or sargramostim (GM-CSF)
  • More than 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin)
  • More than 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy
  • More than 2 weeks since prior corticosteroids
  • More than 1 week since prior parenteral antibiotics
  • At least 1 week since prior aspirin or aspirin-like medications
  • At least 3 days since prior warfarin, clopidogrel bisulfate, or similar compounds
  • No concurrent GM-CSF other than study drug
  • No concurrent G-CSF
  • No concurrent radiotherapy
  • No concurrent glucocorticosteroids
  • No concurrent parenteral antibiotics
  • No concurrent immunosuppressive agents
  • No concurrent drugs that cause bleeding tendencies
  • No other concurrent biologic therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Sargramostim, Flow Cytometry, Biopsy. Cryosurgery
Sargramostim-250 μg, inhaled, two times a day, on days 4-10 and days 36-42 Flow cytometry-Days 1 & 32 Immunoenzyme technique-Days 1 & 32 CT guided biopsy-Days 1 & 32 Cryosurgery-Days 1 and 32
250 μg, inhaled, two times a day, on days 4-10 and days 36-42
Other Names:
  • Leukine
  • GM-CSF (Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor)
Days 1 & 32
Days 1 & 32
CT guided biopsy on days 1 & 32
Days 1 and 32

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immunologic Response as Measured by ELISPOT Assay and Flow Cytometry
Time Frame: Days 1 & 32
CT-guided biopsy & Peritumoral GM-CSF. a CR was defined as involution of the prior tumor and/or ablation site to only a thin, non-enhancing scar within the pulmonary parenchyma on enhanced chest CT. A PR was defined as incomplete resolution of an otherwise thoroughly hypovascular resolving ablation zone which had reached a diameter smaller than the original tumor size. Stable disease (SD) reflects no significant change in size of ablation site and/or overall tumor burden, while the standard definition for progressive disease (PD) remains as evidence of neTw or growing tumors.
Days 1 & 32

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response as Measured by CT Criteria
Time Frame: Days 1 & 32
CT-guided biopsy. a CR was defined as involution of the prior tumor and/or ablation site to only a thin, non-enhancing scar within the pulmonary parenchyma on enhanced chest CT. A PR was defined as incomplete resolution of an otherwise thoroughly hypovascular resolving ablation zone which had reached a diameter smaller than the original tumor size. Stable disease (SD) reflects no significant change in size of ablation site and/or overall tumor burden, while the standard definition for progressive disease (PD) remains as evidence of neTw or growing tumors.
Days 1 & 32
Toxicity of Grade 1 or Higher
Time Frame: Days 11, 32, 43, & 63
Number of Participants with Toxicity of Grade 1 or Higher as defined by CTCAE v2
Days 11, 32, 43, & 63
Immune Function and Cancer-specific Response
Time Frame: Days 1 & 63
Number of Participants with CT-guided biopsy & Peritumoral GM-CSF. The number of IFNγ secreting T-cells was measured by a direct EliSpots at 10:1 E:T ratio to define the kinetics of the CTL responses from pre-CI to day 63 post CI.
Days 1 & 63

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 9, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trials on sargramostim

Subscribe