Standard Reaming Versus Reaming/Irrigating/Aspirating for Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures (STAFF)

March 6, 2020 updated by: Prisma Health-Upstate
Reaming (enlarging of the bone canal) is commonly performed prior to the insertion of intramedullary nails for the fixation of long bone fractures. This study is designed to compare the union rates between fractures reamed by standard reaming versus reaming with a Reamer/Irrigator/ Aspirator (RIA). In addition, this study will collect patient-based outcomes on these patients. Little information exists on the patient based outcomes following femur fractures. We hope that the patient based outcomes of this study will also be able to aid physicians in advising patients with femur fractures of their possible outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Lahey Clinic
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212
        • University of Missouri- Columbia
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
        • Carolinas Medical Center
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29203
        • Palmetto Health
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
        • Greenville Hospital System Univeristy Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37403
        • University of Tennessee-Chattanooga Unit
    • Virginia
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24033
        • Carilion Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men or women between the ages of 18 years and 85 years;
  2. Acute fractures of the femoral shaft

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Fractures not amenable to intramedullary nailing and deemed by the treating surgeon;
  2. Pathological fractures;
  3. Open fractures;
  4. Patients with additional injuries to the ipsilateral femur;
  5. Surgical delay of greater than 7 days from the time of injury;
  6. Retained hardware in the affected limb;
  7. Previous infection in fractured limb;
  8. Likely problems in the judgment of the investigators with maintaining follow-up;
  9. Patients with severe cognitive injuries or disabilities will be excluded if it is deemed that they will be unable to complete the study questionnaires;
  10. Hopeless diagnosis;
  11. Medical comorbidities that prohibit the conductance of surgical treatment under a general anesthetic;
  12. Fractures requiring cephalomedullary nails

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Standard Reaming of femoral shaft fracture prior to intramedullary nailing
Femoral reaming using standard reaming techniques of multiple reamers
Active Comparator: 2
Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirating of femoral shaft fracture prior to intramedullary nailing
Reaming using the Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirating

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Fracture Healing
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient Based Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyle J Jeray, MD, Prisma Health-Upstate

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 24, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ort-07-06-06

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Femoral Fractures

Clinical Trials on Standard Reaming

Subscribe