- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00535990
Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Database for the Purpose of Research
Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Database Looking at Patterns of Care, Outcomes, and Prognostic Analysis for the Purpose of Research
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Minimally invasive surgery has become the gold standard in surgical treatment for many indications, such as treatment of gallstones and acute appendicitis. For many other indications, the potential for minimally invasive approaches exist, but the data does not yet exist to establish it as the gold standard. In addition, there are certain patient factors such as age or weight that may influence the success of a minimally invasive procedure.
While there are numerous articles in the literature reporting outcomes for minimally invasive therapies, these series are often notable for small patient populations and varying definitions of treatment success from study to study. Due to the lack of uniformity in reporting patient outcomes, an opportunity exists to establish a standardized database of a large number of patients undergoing these procedures.
A standardized database will facilitate conducting prospective research of the risk factors and benefits of minimally invasive surgery. This analysis will not only enhance the care provided to these patients, it will reduce the use of ineffective therapy, thus promoting improved efficiency while increasing the quality of care provided within the UCSD system.
This is our initial application. Several other departments at UCSD have developed similar databases. There are numerous examples of prospective databases used for similar purposes in the literature. Smithers, et al, used a prospective database of 446 patients undergoing esophagectomy to compare open to laparoscopic outcomes. Nesset, et al, maintained a database of bariatric surgery patients for two decades and was able to draw conclusions from a data set of 1584 patients. Even at smaller numbers, a prospective database is useful. Andrew, et al, described the improvement in outcomes over the learning curve in the first 201 patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass using such a database. Though labor intensive, Clemmesen, et al, found maintaining a database allowed them to improve care for their patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
- University of California, San Diego
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Gastric Banding Group:
- For gastric banding subjects to qualify for study inclusion, subjects have to have a BMI ranging from 33-40. Currently a BMI of 33 is our lower level of acceptable for bypass.
Control Group:
- All adult subjects 18 years or greater being seen in the minimally invasive surgery clinic for elective laparoscopic surgery will also be screened.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with a BMI>40 will be excluded because their fat cells are very large and therefore fragile and unsuitable for research use.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post Operative Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Post-operative outcomes including: 30 day morbidity 30 day mortality 30 day readmission Surgical site infection Surgical site occurrences Surgical Reintervention Specific Surgical outcomes (staple line leak, etc) |
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 070449
- Internally funded (Indiana University)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hernia
-
University of California, DavisNot yet recruitingInguinal Hernia | Hernia | Hiatal Hernia | Ventral Hernia | Diastasis Recti | Hernia Abdominal WallUnited States
-
University of NebraskaLifeCellCompletedHiatal Hernia | Esophageal Hernia | Hernia, Esophageal | Hernia, Paraesophageal | Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia | Sliding Esophageal Hernia | Sliding Hiatal HerniaUnited States
-
Muhammet Mustafa VuralRecruitingInguinal Hernia | Femoral Hernia | Obturator HerniaTurkey
-
Advanced Medical Solutions Ltd.CompletedInguinal Hernia | Hernia | Femoral Hernia | Groin HerniaUnited States
-
GSVM Medical CollegeCompleted
-
Mette Astrup MadsenCompletedInguinal Hernia | Femoral HerniaDenmark
-
Medtronic - MITGCompletedInguinal Hernia | Ventral HerniaUnited States
-
Anne Arundel Health System Research InstituteMedtronic - MITGCompletedGrade I Ventral Hernia | Grade II Ventral HerniaUnited States
-
The Cleveland ClinicJoseph and Florence Mandel Family FoundationRecruitingHernia | Hernia Surgery | Hernia Incisional | Hernia Incisional Ventral | Hernia Abdominal Wall | Hernia Repair With Compartment Syndrome | Botox InjectionUnited States
-
Hobart HarrisWithdrawnHernia | Ventral Hernia | Abdominal Hernia