A Placebo-Controlled Study for SPM 962 in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Patients

March 26, 2014 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

A Placebo-Controlled Study for SPM 962 in RLS Patients

The primary objective of this study is to investigate efficacy and safety of SPM 962 in Japanese RLS patients in a multi-center, placebo-controlled double-blind parrallel group comparative study following once-daily multiple transdermal doses of SPM 962 within a range of 2.25 to 6.75 mg/day. Recommended maintainance dose range is also to be investigated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

230

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chubu region, Japan
      • Chugoku region, Japan
      • Hokkaido region, Japan
      • Kanto region, Japan
      • Kinki region, Japan
      • Kyushu region, Japan
      • Shikoku region, Japan
      • Tohoku region, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is 20 and more and less than 80 years of age and is able to think about her/his participation at the time of informed consent.
  2. Subject meets the diagnosis of idiopathic RLS based on the 4 cardinal clinical features according to the IRLSSG/NIH.
  3. The following subject will be included in the study

    • Subject is not currently receiving treatment for RLS.
    • Subject has previously received treatment of either L-dopa or dopamine agonists and efficacy was observed in either of drugs.
  4. At baseline, subject has a score of ≧ 15 on the IRLS sum score and RLS symptoms occur twice and more a week (≧score 2 in IRLS Question 7)
  5. Subject has a score of ≧ 4 on the CGI Severity score at baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has secondary RLS in association with renal impairment such as uremia,iron deficiency anemia, and drug associated symptoms.
  2. Subject has, is suspected of having or has a history of sleep disorders such as sleep apnea syndrome, narcolepsy, sleep attacks/sudden onset of sleep.
  3. Subject has additional clinically relevant concomitant diseases or symptoms such as polyneuropathy (including diabetic neuropathy), akathisia,claudication varicoses,muscle fasciculation,painful legs moving toes and radiculopathy.
  4. Subject has other central nervous diseases like Parkinson's disease, dimentia, progressive supranuclear paresis, multisystem atrophy, Huntington's Chorea, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Alzheimer's disease.
  5. At screening or baseline, subject has psychiatric condition like confusion, hallucination, delusion, excitation, deliria, abnormal behaviour.
  6. Subject has orthostatic hypotension or systolic BP marks ≦ 100 mm Hg and with a decrease of BP from supine to standing position of ≧ 30 mm Hg.
  7. Subject has a history of epilepsy, convulsion etc.
  8. Subject has serious cardiac dysfunction and/or arrhythmias (e.g., congestive heart failure Class III or IV by NYHA, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, conduction system dysregulations, second or third degree AV block, complete left bundle branch block, sick-sinus-syndrome, ventricular fibrillation within twelve months prior to enrollment).
  9. Subject has arrhythmia and receiving Class Ia antiarrhythmic drugs(e.g., quinidine, procainamide), Class III antiarrhythmic drugs (e.g., amiodarone, sotalol)
  10. At screening and baseline, subject develops serious ECG abnormality. Subjects has QTc-interval >450 msec twice at screening. Subject has a the average QTc-interval from two ECGs >450 msec in males and >470 msec in females at baseline.
  11. Subject has long QT syndrome congenital.
  12. Subject has a serum potassium level < 3.5 mEq/L at screening.
  13. Subject has a total bilirubin ≧3.0 mg/dL or AST(GOT) and/or ALT(GPT) greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of the reference range (or ≧100 IU/L) at screening.
  14. Subject has BUN ≧ 30 mg/dL or serum creatinine ≧2.0 mg/dl at screening.
  15. Subject has a history of allergic reaction to topical agents such as transdermal patch.
  16. Subject is pregnant or nursing or woman who plans pregnancy during the trial.
  17. Subject pursues shift work or is subject to other continuous non-disease-related life conditions which do not allow regular sleep at night.
  18. Subject has autoimmune disease, chronic active hepatitis or immune deficiency disorder.
  19. Subject has a malignant neoplastic disease requiring therapy within twelve months prior to screening.

19. Subject received an investigational drug from other clinical trial within the last 12 months prior to baseline.

20. Subject is judged to be inappropriate for this trial by investigator on the other than above.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 1
inactive placebo
transdermal application, 1 time per day, 0-6.75 mg/body, titration, 6weeks
Other Names:
  • rotigotine
Experimental: 2
2.25 mg first week: 2.25 mg 1 sheet plus placebo 1 sheet 2nd to 6th week :2.25mg 1 sheet plus placebo 2 sheets
transdermal application, 1 time per day, 0-6.75 mg/body, titration, 6weeks
Other Names:
  • rotigotine
Experimental: 3
4.5 mg/body first week : 2.25 mg 2 sheets 2nd to 6th week : 2.25 mg 2 sheets pus placebo 1 sheet
transdermal application, 1 time per day, 0-6.75 mg/body, titration, 6weeks
Other Names:
  • rotigotine
Experimental: 4
6.75 mg/body first week : 2.25 mg 2 sheets 2nd to 6th week : 2.25 mg 3sheets
transdermal application, 1 time per day, 0-6.75 mg/body, titration, 6weeks
Other Names:
  • rotigotine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score From the Baseline to the End of Titration/Maintenance Period
Time Frame: Baseline, end of maintenance period at 6 weeks

IRLS is a scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms. IRLS consists of ten questions. Each question is scored from 4 for the first (top) answer (usually 'very severe') to 0 for the last answer (usually none).

The sum of the score of each question serves as the scale score.

The scale scoring criteria are: Mild (score 1-10); Moderate (score 11-20); Severe (score 21-30); Very severe (score 31-40). A decrease in the scores means improvement.

Baseline, end of maintenance period at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. The data at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.

CGI is a clinician-reported scale for assessing severity of illness.

The sale scoring criteria are 1: Normal, not at all ill, 2: Borderline ill, 3: Mildly ill, 4: Moderately ill, 5: Markedly ill, 6: Severely ill, 7: Among the most extremely ill patients.

Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. The data at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Improvement
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. The data at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.
The PGI-I is a self-rated 7-point scale, with scores ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), that assesses the improvement or worsening of a patient's illness relative to baseline at the beginning of the intervention. Scores: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; or 7=very much worse. Moderate and marked improvement = score of 1 or 2, Without improvement = score of 4, Marked and moderate aggravation = score of 6 or 7.
Baseline, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. The data at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, every two weeks

PSQI is a scale for assessing severity of sleep disorders. The score ranges from 0 to 21. 0 indicates "no difficulty" and 21 indicates "severe difficulty". A decrease in the scores means improvement.

The data at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.

Baseline, every two weeks
Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline, every two weeks
Mean Change from baseline in MOS Short Form SF-36 to 6 weeks after dosing. SF-36 is a scale for assessing health status in clinical practice and research. The scores of 36 questions are summarized into 7 sub-scales. In each sub-scale which range is 0-100, a higher score indicates a better health status. Thus a increase in the scores means improvement.
Baseline, every two weeks
IRLS Each Parameter
Time Frame: Baseline, every two weeks

IRLS is a scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms. IRLS consists of ten questions. Each question is scored from 4 for the first (top) answer (usually 'very severe') to 0 for the last answer (usually none).

The sum of the score of each question serves as the scale score. The scale scoring criteria are: Mild (score 1-10); Moderate (score 11-20); Severe (score 21-30); Very severe (score 31-40). A decrease in the scores means improvement.

The percentage of subjects with -3 or -4 changes from baseline in each parameter at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.

Baseline, every two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Katsuhisa Saito, New Product Evaluation Development

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

Clinical Trials on SPM 962

3
Subscribe