Improving Stroke Rehabilitation: Spacing Effect and D-cycloserine

January 21, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs
Each year 730,000 Americans experience a stroke. Forty percent are left with significant paralysis of one arm. Certain types of physical therapy, for example constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT), have been shown to be effective in improving arm function. However, for most subjects, improvement is modest. In this trial, we test two approaches that may increase the amount of improvement achieved: 1) distributing treatment over a greater amount of time; and 2) adding a drug, d-cycloserine, which theoretically enhances the molecular mechanisms of learning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Each year, 730,000 Americans experience a stroke. Forty percent are left with persistent impairment of upper extremity function. Although scientifically vetted rehabilitation therapies for this impairment are starting to emerge, current treatment is generally unsatisfactory. Therapies that seek to engage neuroplastic mechanisms constitute one approach to this problem. A good example is constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT), a treatment that seeks, through extensive functional task practice, to overcome an acquired intentional predisposition to use the spared arm (learned non-use), and to improve motor function in the affected arm. CIMT has been tested in a host of trials, most recently a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) - the EXCITE trial. These trials have generally demonstrated that on average, the treatment shows efficacy, and the results from the RCT indicate that it is more efficacious than "standard" therapies. However, problems with CIMT can be readily identified that pose research challenges: 1) on average, efficacy is limited; 2) only a fraction of subjects show substantial benefit. We propose to address these two problems in a pilot RCT of 20 subjects that will test two modifications of standard CIMT: 1) addition of a drug, d-cycloserine, that may enhance neuroplasticity by potentiating NMDA-glutamate receptor-mediated learning mechanisms; 2) delivery of a fixed amount of CIMT over a greater number of days, which according to learning research, may enhance long-term retention of gains.

All subjects in this trial will receive CIMT. Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 groups:

A. CIMT + d-cycloserine, more condensed treatment B. CIMT + d-cycloserine, less condensed treatment C. CIMT + placebo, more condensed treatment D. CIMT + placebo, less condensed treatment The primary outcome measure will be performance on the Wolf Motor Function Test (time) 3 months after completion of treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 21-80,
  • of either sex,
  • diverse ethnic background,
  • s/p a single unilateral hemispheric stroke 6 or more months prior,
  • who meet upper extremity functional criteria for participation in constraint induced movement therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of more than minor head trauma,
  • subarachnoid hemorrhage,
  • dementia or other neurodegenerative disease,
  • multiple sclerosis,
  • lobar intracerebral hemorrhage,
  • epilepsy,
  • drug or alcohol abuse,
  • serious medical illness,
  • serum creatinine >1.5,
  • schizophrenia,
  • major refractory depression,
  • insufficient cardiopulmonary function to participate in low-intensity,
  • sustained upper extremity exercise,
  • severe visual impairment,
  • pregnancy,
  • inability to understand the potential risks and benefits of the study,
  • personally provide informed consent, and
  • understand and cooperate with treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
D-cycloserine + distributed treatment
Subjects will receive CIMT 2 hours/day, 3 days a week, for 10 weeks, in conjunction with d-cycloserine 50 mg PO administered before each treatment session
Other Names:
  • spaced training
Sham Comparator: Arm 2
D-cycloserine + condensed treatment
Subjects will receive CIMT 6 hours/day, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks, in conjunction with d-cycloserine 50 mg PO administered before each treatment session
Placebo Comparator: Arm 3
Placebo + distributed treatment
Subjects will receive CIMT 2 hours/day, 3 days a week, for 10 weeks, in conjunction with placebo administered before each treatment session
Other Names:
  • spaced training
Placebo Comparator: Arm 4
Placebo + condensed treatment
Subjects will receive CIMT 6 hours/day, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks, in conjunction with placebo administered before each treatment session

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wolf Motor Function Test (Time)
Time Frame: 3 months after completion of treatment
The Wolf Motor Function Test (time) score is the average time in seconds taken to perform each of 15 functional tasks ranging in difficulty from putting one's forearm on a table to stacking checkers. Participants are given 120 seconds to perform a task and if they fail, they are scored 120 for that task. Score range on the WMFT-T is 0-120, lower scores being better.
3 months after completion of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen E Nadeau, MD BS BS, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on D-cycloserine + distributed treatment

3
Subscribe