- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00816751
Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine
July 22, 2019 updated by: Jessica Kingston, University of California, San Diego
Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine for Suction Curettage: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy of intracervical versus paracervical block on pain experienced during first trimester suction curettage without the use of preoperative cervical ripening.
Because of the theoretical improved reliability of stromal block, the investigators hypothesize that intracervical block would produce lower pain scores than paracervical block at the time of cervical dilation.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
89
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92101
- Planned Parenthood
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women presenting for elective first trimester abortion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Gestation over 12 weeks by ultrasound
- Weight less than 98 pounds
- Known allergy to lidocaine
- Known nonviable pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 2
|
The buffered lidocaine preparation for both block techniques consisted of 50 mL of 1% lidocaine, 5 units of vasopressin, and 5 mL 8% sodium bicarbonate.
The intracervical block was administered using 20 ml of buffered lidocaine and a 1-1/2 inch, 20 gauge needle in order to overcome the increased resistance to injection caused by the cervical stroma.
A small amount was injected at the tenaculum site, and the remainder into the cervical stroma at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock, at a depth of 1-1/2 inch by inserting the needle to the hub.
|
|
Active Comparator: 1
|
The paracervical block was administered using 20 ml of buffered lidocaine and a 5/8 inch, 25-gauge needle.
A small amount was injected at the tenaculum site, and the remainder equally distributed around the cervicovaginal junction at 3, 5, 7, and 9 o'clock.
The depth was standardized at 5/8 inch by inserting the needle to the hub.
The buffered lidocaine preparation for both block techniques consisted of 50 mL of 1% lidocaine, 5 units of vasopressin, and 5 mL 8% sodium bicarbonate.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Score, as Assessed Using a 10 cm Linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: at completion of procedure
|
VAS on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being lowest pain and 10 highest amount of pain
|
at completion of procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Gestational Age at Time of Procedure
Time Frame: At the time of the procedure
|
At the time of the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 31, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 2, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
January 5, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 13, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 22, 2019
Last Verified
July 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Natriuretic Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anesthetics, Local
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Hemostatics
- Coagulants
- Vasoconstrictor Agents
- Antidiuretic Agents
- Lidocaine
- Vasopressins
- Arginine Vasopressin
Other Study ID Numbers
- ONG-08-1781
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
Clinical Trials on Paracervical block
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityPlanned Parenthood Federation of AmericaCompletedPain | Legal Abortion With ComplicationUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedPain Due to Intrauterine Contraceptive DeviceUnited States
-
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University...Active, not recruiting
-
University of HawaiiCompleted
-
University of RochesterWithdrawnProstate DiseaseUnited States
-
Acorda TherapeuticsCompleted
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania; BayerCompleted
-
Kayseri Education and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Mount Sinai Hospital, CanadaCompletedContraceptionCanada