Use of Endobronchial Valves in Non-Upper Lobe Heterogeneous Emphysema

Comparative Study of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction to Evaluate Relative Efficacy in Patients With Non-Upper Lobe Emphysema

Hypothesis: Patients with advanced emphysema with predominance of the disease in areas other than the upper lobes, as determined by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), could have a positive response to valve treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW3 6NP
        • Royal Brompton Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Ex-smoker with smoking cessation confirmed by exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) levels
  • Moderate to severe airflow obstruction FEV1 <50% Predicted
  • Severe dyspnoea - mMRC ≥2
  • Hyperinflation - total lung capacity (TLC) ≥100% predicted, RV ≥150% predicted
  • SWT ≥75m
  • Optimum COPD treatment for at least 6 weeks
  • No COPD exacerbation for at least 6 weeks
  • Less than 4 admissions for exacerbation in the preceding 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to provide informed consent
  • Patient without clear targets for airflow re-distribution
  • Total lung CO uptake (TLCO) <15% predicted and FEV1 <15% predicted
  • pO2 on air <6.0kPa
  • pCO2 on air >8.0kPa
  • Neurological, rheumatological or other cause of exercise limitation
  • Other major medical illness, e.g. lung cancer that will limit participation
  • Production of purulent sputum more often than not (more than 50% of days)
  • Clinically significant bronchiectasis
  • Large bulla - more than 1/3 of hemithorax volume (i.e. where bullectomy would be more suitable) on CT scan
  • Arrhythmia or cardiovascular disease that poses a risk during procedure or exercise
  • Prednisolone dose greater than 15mg a day
  • Significant pulmonary hypertension - RVSP ≥45mmHg
  • Left ventricular failure - left ventricular ejection fraction <45% or left ventricular fraction shortening <23%
  • Prior LVRS or lobectomy
  • Lung nodule requiring surgery
  • Subject completed or is participating in a standard pulmonary rehabilitation program within 3 months of enrolment
  • Female of childbearing age with positive pregnancy test
  • Subject participated in a research study of investigational drug or device in prior 30 days
  • Subject taking clopidogrel, warfarin, or other anticoagulants and unable to abstain for 5 days pre-procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Upper-lobe predominant emphysema
Device: Intra-bronchial valve (Spiration IBV) The IBV is comprised of a Nitnol frame and a polymer membrane, which is held against the airway mucosa by six elastic struts and will expand and contract with airway movement during breathing. The valve is designed to conform to the size and shape of the airways. The frame has 5 flexible anchors that gently secure to the mucosal wall at a controlled depth. Valves are available in 5, 6 and 7mm diameters appropriate for different airways. During a minimally invasive procedure, a catheter is passed through a bronchoscope (a flexible tube passed into the airways through the mouth) to deploy the umbrella-shaped valves into the airways. Only flexible bronchoscopy equipment is required. The valves are designed to be removed if indicated.
Other Names:
  • Spiration IBV
Active Comparator: 2
Non-upper lobe predominant emphysema
Device: Intra-bronchial valve (Spiration IBV) The IBV is comprised of a Nitnol frame and a polymer membrane, which is held against the airway mucosa by six elastic struts and will expand and contract with airway movement during breathing. The valve is designed to conform to the size and shape of the airways. The frame has 5 flexible anchors that gently secure to the mucosal wall at a controlled depth. Valves are available in 5, 6 and 7mm diameters appropriate for different airways. During a minimally invasive procedure, a catheter is passed through a bronchoscope (a flexible tube passed into the airways through the mouth) to deploy the umbrella-shaped valves into the airways. Only flexible bronchoscopy equipment is required. The valves are designed to be removed if indicated.
Other Names:
  • Spiration IBV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To estimate the difference between study arms in volume changes of the treated lobe(s) by CT scan
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To estimate the difference between study arms in volume changes of the non-treated lobes by CT scan
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms in residual volume
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms in FEV1
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms in gas transfer
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms in modified MRC dyspnoea score
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms on a 6 minute walk test
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms in disease specific health status
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms in dynamic hyperinflation during cycle ergometry
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
To estimate the difference between study arms in changes in respiratory and quadriceps muscle strength
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 21, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heterogeneous Emphysema

Clinical Trials on Intra-bronchial valve (Spiration IBV)

3
Subscribe