Nutritional Status and Enteral Absorption Capability After Brain Death (HRSA Nutrition)

June 13, 2014 updated by: Georgene Hergenroeder, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Clinical Interventions to Increase Organ Procurement Nutritional Status and Enteral Absorption Capability After Brain Death (R38OT10585)

The investigators propose to assess 36 donors' nutritional status using accepted parameters (prealbumin, resting energy expenditure); to assess nutrient intestinal absorption through 13Curacil breath tests; and to evaluate serum concentrations of IL-6 and TNFalpha to determine if continuing or initiating enteral feeding and nutritional supplementation is effective in restoring or maintaining nutritional parameters.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

There are an estimated 98,000 people in need of organ transplants in the United States (OPTN). Only a fraction of the need is met with the organs that become available. Therefore interventions are needed to maximize the viability of available organs and improve donor organ procurement and successful transplantation.

Improving the nutritional status of potential donors after they are declared brain dead could favorably impact subsequent organ procurement. Improved nutrition may improve organ viability by reducing the negative effects of inflammatory cytokines and catecholamines, and through reducing translocation of bacteria or endotoxin from the intestine.

In our preliminary work the investigators show significantly elevated inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNFalpha) in unfed donors and a correlation with improved graft survival in recipients with lower plasma concentrations of IL-6.

The investigators propose to assess 36 donors' nutritional status using accepted parameters (prealbumin, resting energy expenditure); to assess nutrient intestinal absorption through 13Curacil breath tests; and to evaluate serum concentrations of IL-6 and TNFalpha to determine if continuing or initiating enteral feeding and nutritional supplementation is effective in restoring or maintaining nutritional parameters. Additionally, half of the group will be randomized to receive a nutritional supplement via naso/oro-duodenal feeding tube with a commercially available formula containing omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, and antioxidants plus glutamine (Oxepa® plus Glutasolve). The intervention through its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant functions has the potential to improve organ function (e.g. improved myocardial function (Wischmeyer 2003), and improved oxygenation (Pacht 2003; Pontes-Arruda 2006; Singer 2006)). Through improved organ function and/or a suppression of inflammatory cytokine production (e.g., IL-6 and TNFalpha) more organs are expected to be appropriate for procurement/transplantation.

If enteral nutrition reduces the inflammatory response commonly documented after brain death and, in doing so, improves organ procurement, enteral feeding could be immediately employed toward improving donor care practices. Furthermore, reducing the level of inflammatory molecules in donor organs may reduce the risk of rejection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Memorial Hermann Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 63 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Consented solid organ donor
  2. Age >14, <65 years old
  3. Donors may have received or are receiving parenteral or enteral nutrition

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known gastric or small bowel resections
  2. Known malabsorptive disease of the gastrointestinal tract
  3. Bariatric procedures, vagotomy or pyloroplasty
  4. Known acute or chronic pancreatitis
  5. Requiring an FiO2 > 60%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: 1 standard care
organ donors receiving standard care
Experimental: 2 Enteral Feeding
enteral feeding with Oxepa® and RESOURCE® GLUTASOLVE®
enteral feeding with Oxepa® and RESOURCE® GLUTASOLVE®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Outcome Measure is IL-6 Level
Time Frame: 12+/-2 hours
Plasma IL-6 level measured by ELISA. The 12+/-2 hour time frame is prior to organ explantation.
12+/-2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Georgene Hergenroeder, MHA, RN, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Death

Clinical Trials on enteral feeding with Oxepa® and Glutasolve®

3
Subscribe