Erlotinib and Docetaxel in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) After Failure of One Chemotherapy Regimen

May 22, 2009 updated by: Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study of a Sequential Treatment of Intermittent Erlotinib and Docetaxel Versus Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of a Prior Chemotherapy Regimen

Erlotinib has demonstrated efficacy as a single agent in patients with NSCLC and the addition of erlotinib to chemotherapy has not achieved better results in the general population.

However, several preclinical and phase I studies have shown that a sequential treatment of erlotinib and chemotherapy could avoid a possible negative interaction between both drugs when administrated concomitantly, and therefore, it could improve the benefit of the combination therapy.

This study will investigate if the intermittent treatment of a chemotherapy drug, such as docetaxel, with erlotinib could achieve a clinical benefit.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alicante, Spain, 03550
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital San Juan de Alicante
      • Valencia, Spain, 46017
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset
      • Valencia, Spain, 46015
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
    • Alicante
      • Alcoy, Alicante, Spain, 3804
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Virgen de los Lirios
      • Benidorm, Alicante, Spain, 03501
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínica de Benidorm
      • Elda, Alicante, Spain, 03600
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hospital General de Elda
    • Castellón
      • Castellón de la Plana, Castellón, Spain, 12002
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Provincial de Castellon
    • Valencia
      • Sagunto, Valencia, Spain, 46520
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de Sagunto
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent.
  • Age >= 18 years.
  • Histologically or cytologically documented inoperable, locally advanced (stage IIIb with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC.
  • Patients who have failed only one prior chemotherapy to treat the advanced disease and candidates to receive a second line treatment.
  • ECOG PS 0-2.
  • Adequate hematological function: hemoglobin => 9 g/dl; neutrophils count => 1.5 x 10(9)/l; platelet count => 100 x 10(9)/l.
  • Adequate liver function: Bilirubin <= 1,5 x ULN; AST and ALT <= x 3 ULN when no hepatic metastases or <=5 x ULN if hepatic metastases; Alkaline phosphatase <=5 x UNL except that there is hepatic metastases.
  • Adequate renal function: Calculated creatinine clearance => 40 mL/min (Cockroft y Gault) or serum creatinine <= 1.5 x ULN .
  • Patient able to meet the requirements of the study and accessible for correct follow-up.
  • Oral swallowing capability.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treated with more than one chemotherapeutic treatment for NSCLC
  • Concomitant treatment with another drug under investigation.
  • Pregnancy or lactation. Fertile women must provide a negative result of pregnancy test (in serum or urine) within 7 days prior to study treatment start. In addition, they must use an effective method of contraception (oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, barrier methods of contraception, together with spermicidal jelly or surgical sterilization) during the study.
  • Evidence of other disease, metabolic or neurological dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates use of an investigational drug or patient at high risk from treatment complications.
  • Contraindication for the use of erlotinib or docetaxel.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Docetaxel and Erlotinib

Patients in the experimental arm will receive sequential treatment of intermittent erlotinib and docetaxel up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal or investigator's decision to discontinue the treatment.

After 4 cycles, participants will receive 150 mg of erlotinib per day until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal or investigator's decision to discontinue the treatment.

Docetaxel (Taxotere®) 75 mg/m2 iv first day of each 21-day cycle. Erlotinib (Tarceva®) 150 mg po days 2-16 of each 21-day cycle. Total: 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression
Active Comparator: Erlotinib
Erlotinib (Tarceva®) 150 mg/day po daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal or investigator's decision to discontinue the treatment.
150 mg/day po daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of patients without disease progression after 6 months of treatment.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: Time from randomization until objective tumor progression or death for any cause. Tumour progression will be assessed every 2 months.
Time from randomization until objective tumor progression or death for any cause. Tumour progression will be assessed every 2 months.
Duration of Response
Time Frame: The time from the first complete response or partial response until objective tumor progression or death due to progression disease. Tumour progression will be assessed every 2 months.
The time from the first complete response or partial response until objective tumor progression or death due to progression disease. Tumour progression will be assessed every 2 months.
Overall Response Rate
Time Frame: The proportion of patients with tumor size reduction (complete response or partial response following RECIST criteria). Response will be assessed every 2 months.
The proportion of patients with tumor size reduction (complete response or partial response following RECIST criteria). Response will be assessed every 2 months.
Disease Control Rate
Time Frame: The proportion of patients without tumor size increase (complete response, partial response or stable disease following RECIST criteria). Response wil be assessed every 2 months.
The proportion of patients without tumor size increase (complete response, partial response or stable disease following RECIST criteria). Response wil be assessed every 2 months.
Overall survival
Time Frame: Time from randomization until death from any cause. Follow up wil be assessed every 3 months after finishing study treatment.
Time from randomization until death from any cause. Follow up wil be assessed every 3 months after finishing study treatment.
Safety profile
Time Frame: Toxicity will be discribed per cycle and per patient according to CTCAE vs. 3, every 3 weeks.
Toxicity will be discribed per cycle and per patient according to CTCAE vs. 3, every 3 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oscar Juan, Doctor, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2009

Last Verified

May 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Docetaxel and Erlotinib

3
Subscribe