- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01034657
LBH589 Alone or in Combination With Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA) in Patients With Low or Int-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) (GEPARD)
August 8, 2017 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
A One Year, Open Label, Multicenter Trial of LBH589 Alone or in Combination With ESA in Red Blood Cell Transfusion-dependent LOW and INT-1 MDS Patients Being Either Refractory to ESA or With a Low Probability of Response - the GErman PAnobinostat Low Risk MDS Trial - GEPARD Study
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of LBH589 as single agent and in combination with ESA in red blood cell transfusion-dependent Low and Int-1 MDS patients being either refractory to ESA or with a low probability of response.
The study had a non-randomized core phase followed by a randomized phase.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
34
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 12203
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Bonn, Germany, 53105
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Dresden, Germany, 01307
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Duesseldorf, Germany, 40225
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Duisburg, Germany, 47166
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Goettingen, Germany, 37075
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Hannover, Germany, 30625
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04103
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Muenchen, Germany, 81675
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Ulm, Germany, 89081
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Baden-Württemberg
-
Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 68305
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a lower risk MDS (LOW or INT-1 according to IPSS)
- Red blood cell transfusion dependency of at least 4 Units/8 weeks.
- Not responding to Erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) or having a low chance to do so
- Age-adjusted normal cardiac, kidney, liver function
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant use of ESA
- Concomitant use of any other investigational drug
- Other malignancy that is not in remission for at least 1 year
- Platelet Count < 75 x 109/L
- Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant cardiac diseases
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: LBH589
During the core phase, all participants received oral LBH589 40 mg (30 mg after a protocol amendment) for 4 months.
During the randomization phase, participants with hematological improvement of the erythropoetic system (HI-E) and participants with stable disease, who were randomized to single agent LBH589, continued on single agent LBH589 40mg/30mg for an additional 4 months.
|
LBH589 was supplied at dose strengths of 5 mg or 20 mg hard gelatin capsules.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: LBH589 + Epoetin Alfa
During the randomized phase, participants randomized to LBH589 + Epoetin Alfa (ESA) received oral LBH589 40mg/30mg + ESA 30000 international units (IU)/week injected subcutaneously for 4 months.
|
LBH589 was supplied at dose strengths of 5 mg or 20 mg hard gelatin capsules.
Other Names:
Epoetin alfa was supplied as 10000 IU/1 mL in a ready-to-use syringe.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hematological Response of the Erythropoetic System (HI-E) - Core Phase
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
HI-E was assessed according to the modified international working group (IWG) criteria for HI.
Erythroid response (pretreatment, <11 g/dL): Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk, and only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation; Platelet response (pretreatment, < 100 x 109/L): absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with > 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from < 20 x 109/L to > 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; Neutrophil response (pretreatment, < 1.0 x 109/L): at least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 x 109/L; Progression or relapse after HI: At least 1 of the following: At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in Hgb by ≥1.5 g/dL, or transfusion dependence.
|
16 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase
Time Frame: 32 weeks, 52 weeks
|
HI-E was assessed according to the modified international working group (IWG) criteria for HI.
Erythroid response (pretreatment, <11 g/dL): Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk, and only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation; Platelet response (pretreatment, < 100 x 109/L): absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with > 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from < 20 x 109/L to > 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; Neutrophil response (pretreatment, < 1.0 x 109/L): at least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 x 109/L; Progression or relapse after HI: At least 1 of the following: At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in Hgb by ≥1.5 g/dL, or transfusion dependence.
|
32 weeks, 52 weeks
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During Core Phase
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
Objective response (complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) and HI-platelet (HI-P) response + HI-neutrophil (HI-N) response) was assessed according to the modified IWG criteria: CR bone marrow with 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of al cell lines (persistent dysplasia is noted) and peripheral blood with Hgb >= 11 g/dL platelets >=100 X 10^9/L, neutrophils >= 1.0 x 10^9/L and blasts 0%.
PR = All CR if abnormal before treatment except bone marrow blasts decreased by>=50% over pretreatment but still >5% (ellularity and morphology not relevant).
HI-P (pretreatment, < 100 x 109/L) = absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with > 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from < 20 x 109/L to > 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; HI-N (pretreatment, < 1.0 x 109/L) = at least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 x 10^9/L.
|
16 weeks
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized Phase
Time Frame: 32 weeks, 48 weeks
|
Objective response (complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) and HI-platelet (HI-P) response + HI-neutrophil (HI-N) response) was assessed according to the modified IWG criteria: CR bone marrow with 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of al cell lines (persistent dysplasia is noted) and peripheral blood with Hgb >= 11 g/dL platelets >=100 X 10^9/L, neutrophils >= 1.0 x 10^9/L and blasts 0%.
PR = All CR if abnormal before treatment except bone marrow blasts decreased by>=50% over pretreatment but still >5% (ellularity and morphology not relevant).
HI-P (pretreatment, < 100 x 109/L) = absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with > 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from < 20 x 109/L to > 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; HI-N (pretreatment, < 1.0 x 109/L) = at least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 x 10^9/L.
|
32 weeks, 48 weeks
|
|
Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Core Phase
Time Frame: baseline
|
The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis.
A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast <5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex >= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies.
A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts.
The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values.
The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high >=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
|
baseline
|
|
Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized Phase
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis.
A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast <5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex >= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies.
A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts.
The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values.
The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high >=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
|
52 weeks
|
|
Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Core Phase
Time Frame: baseline
|
The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis.
A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast <5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex >= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies.
A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts.
The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values.
The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high >=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
|
baseline
|
|
Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Randomized Phase
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis.
A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast <5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex >= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies.
A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts.
The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values.
The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high >=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
|
52 weeks
|
|
Overall Survival (OS) - Overall Period
Time Frame: 48 weeks
|
OS was defined as the time from start of treatment to death from any cause.
|
48 weeks
|
|
Time to Response - Overall Period
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
Time to response was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first documented response (complete [CR] or partial [PR]) according to modified IWG criteria for HI.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Event-free Survival (EFS) - Overall Period
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
EFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to failure or death from any cause.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Overall Period
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to disease progression or death from MDS.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Disease-free Survival (DFS) - Overall Period
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
DFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the time to relapse.
|
52 weeks
|
|
Time to Cause-specific Death - Overall Period
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
Time to cause-specific death was defined as the time from start of treatment to death related to MDS.
|
52 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2012
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 16, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
December 17, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 11, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 8, 2017
Last Verified
August 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Neoplasms
- Disease
- Bone Marrow Diseases
- Hematologic Diseases
- Precancerous Conditions
- Syndrome
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Preleukemia
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Hematinics
- Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
- Epoetin Alfa
- Panobinostat
Other Study ID Numbers
- CLBH589BDE04
- EudraCT 2009-010403-84 (Registry Identifier: EudraCT)
- 2009-010403-84
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
-
Institut de Recherches Internationales ServierServier Bio-Innovation LLCRecruitingMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) | Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) Naive Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States, France, United Kingdom, Spain, Australia, Germany, Brazil, Italy, Netherlands, Japan
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteCompletedMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States
-
SCRI Development Innovations, LLCNovartis PharmaceuticalsTerminated
-
PersImmune, IncUniversity of California, San DiegoUnknown
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbActive, not recruitingMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States
-
TJ Biopharma Co., Ltd.Terminated
-
AbbVieCelgene; Genentech, Inc.CompletedMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States, Australia, Germany
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...UnknownMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)China
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)United States, Israel
-
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.SuspendedLeukemia | Myelodysplastic Syndrome(MDS)United States
Clinical Trials on LBH589
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsTerminatedLeukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell | Cutaneous T-Cell LymphomaJapan
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...NovartisTerminatedBrain Metastasis | Recurrent Glioma | High-grade MeningiomaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedExtranodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma of Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue | Nodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma | Recurrent Adult Burkitt Lymphoma | Recurrent Adult Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma | Recurrent Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma | Recurrent Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Recurrent Grade... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedExtranodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma of Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue | Nodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma | Recurrent Adult Burkitt Lymphoma | Recurrent Adult Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma | Recurrent Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma | Recurrent Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma | Recurrent Grade... and other conditionsUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
Anne Beaven, MDNovartisTerminatedDiffuse Large B-cell LymphomaUnited States
-
Abdullah KutlarSecura Bio, Inc.RecruitingSickle Cell DiseaseUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedMetastatic Breast Cancer | HER-2 Positive Breast CancerBelgium, Netherlands, Australia, Italy, United States
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteNovartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedMultiple MyelomaUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedLymphoma | Leukemia | Multiple MyelomaUnited States, Germany, Australia