Noise, a Risk for Heart in Airplane Pilots

February 4, 2010 updated by: Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

Noise of Airplanes a Factor of Risk for the Health of the Heart in Pilots and Crew in Operations of the F16 Airplane

Study of noise generated by military-type aircraft and equipment maintenance in relation to non-auditory effects that impact with the body of the crew and ground staff can cause cardiac pathologies

Hypothesis of work: The pilots and the technical personnel of maintenance that work before the exhibition of noise generated by planes hunt F-16, or equipments of maintenance of the same ones, present major risk of a cardiac affectation, which demonstrates in changes in the normal pace of the heart, in his function of bomb or in hemodynamic conditions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The work area military airport is characterized by low frequency noise in sound pressure levels exceeding 100 dB, smashing into the body of pilots and ground staff.

It found variations in the thickness of the pericardium and deviation measures ejection fraction

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years to 37 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Group of subjects directly exposed to noise from military aircraft F-16 during its operation and maintenance at the airbase Vicente Landaeta Gil de Barquisimeto. Lara. Venezuela

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • exposure to noise from military aircraft

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inactive personal or vacation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
fighter pilots f-16
This group is made up of pilots from the F-16 Venezuelan military air force stationed in the Base Vicente Landaeta Gil de Barquisimeto, Lara State.
We performed the measurement of occupational noise exposure through sound level meter and Dosimeter during flight operations of F-16 fighter plane.
Other Names:
  • occupational noise generated by aircraft miliary
Cardiovascular valuation was performed via electrocardiogram and echocardiographic techniques to correlate the changes observed during exposure to occupational noise
Other Names:
  • cardiovascular study
aircraft maintenance personnel f-16
Staff responsible for the preparation of aircraft for the flight and maintenance in the hangar at the airbase Vicente Landaeta Gil de Barquisimeto, Lara. Venezuela
We performed the measurement of occupational noise exposure through sound level meter and Dosimeter during flight operations of F-16 fighter plane.
Other Names:
  • occupational noise generated by aircraft miliary
Cardiovascular valuation was performed via electrocardiogram and echocardiographic techniques to correlate the changes observed during exposure to occupational noise
Other Names:
  • cardiovascular study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
left ventricular systolic function
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
electrical disturbance of the heart
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days
study of the dimensions of cavities of the heart
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days
haemodynamic study of the conditions
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days
characterization of ambient sound military aero by Sound Level Meter
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days
sensitivity analysis of noise dosimetry
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days
subjective perception of noise
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days
analysis of clinical background for selection of sample subjects
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fredesvinda M Méndez, MSc, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
  • Study Director: Manuel Recuero, PhD, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2005

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2010

Last Verified

January 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMendezV001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pericarditis

Clinical Trials on exposure to occupational noise

3
Subscribe