Canakinumab in the Treatment of Acute Gout Flares and Prevention of New Flares in Patients Unable to Use Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and/or Colchicines Including a 12 Week Extension and a 1 Year Open-label Extension Study. (β-RELIEVED-II)

A Randomized, Controlled Study of ACZ885 (Canakinumab) on the Treatment and Prevention of Gout Flares in Patients With Frequent Flares for Whom NSAIDs and/or Colchicine Are Contraindicated, Not Tolerated or Ineffective Including a 12 Weeks Extension Study and a 1 Year Open-label Extension Study

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that canakinumab given upon acute gout flares relieves the signs and symptoms and prevents recurrence of gout flares in patients with frequent flares of gout for whom non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/ or colchicine are contraindicated, not tolerated, or ineffective. The efficacy of canakinumab was compared to the corticosteroid triamcinolone acetonide.

The purpose of the first 12 week extension study was to collect additional safety, tolerability and efficacy data in patients who have completed the core study CACZ885H2357.

The purpose of the second one year open-label extension study was to confirm the long-term safety and tolerability of canakinumab in patients who had completed the first extension study.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Acute Gout
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Canakinumab 150 mg; Drug: Placebo to triamcinolone acetonide; Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg; Drug: Placebo to canakinumab

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 226
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • British Columbia
    • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
      • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
    • St-John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
      • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Quebec
    • Sainte Foy, Quebec, Canada
      • Novartis Investigative Site
• China
  • Taiwan
    • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
      • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan, China
      • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Taichung, Taiwan, China
      • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Taipei, Taiwan, China
      • Novartis Investigative Site
• Netherlands
  • Enschede, Netherlands
    • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Leeuwarden, Netherlands
    • Novartis Investigative Site
• Russian Federation
  • Moscow, Russian Federation
    • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
    • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
    • Novartis Investigative Site
• United States
  • Alabama
    • Anniston, Alabama, United States, 36207
      • Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
    • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
      • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • Foley, Alabama, United States, 36535
      • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
      • Horizon Research Group, Inc.
  • Arizona
    • Peoria, Arizona, United States, 85381
      • Sun Valley Arthritis Center, LTD
    • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85741
      • Genova Clinical Research
  • Arkansas
    • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
      • Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic
  • California
    • Burbank, California, United States, 91505
      • Providence Research
    • Carlsbad, California, United States, 92008
      • Diagnamics, Inc.
    • Fair Oaks, California, United States, 95628
      • MED Investigations
    • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
      • Valerius Medical Group and Research Center of Long Branch
    • Norwalk, California, United States, 90650
      • Lucita M. Cruz, M.D., Inc.
    • Orangevale, California, United States, 95662
      • Sierra Clinical Research
    • Pomona, California, United States, 91767
      • Chaparral Medical Grp, INC Clinical Research
    • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
      • River City Clinical Research
    • San Antonio, California, United States, 782209
      • Arthritis Associates
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
      • California Research Foundation
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92108
      • Rochester Clinical Research
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92117
      • Ritchken and First MDs
    • San Marino, California, United States, 91108
      • Huntington Medical Foundation
    • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92701
      • Crest Clinical Trials
    • Tustin, California, United States, 92780
      • Orange County Research Center
    • Vista, California, United States, 92803
      • Progressive Clinical Research
    • West Covina, California, United States, 91790
      • Center for Clinical Trials of San Gabriel
  • Connecticut
    • Danbury, Connecticut, United States, 06810
      • Clinical Res Ct of CT - Arthritis Associates of CT/NY, LLC
  • Florida
    • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
      • Innovative Research of West Florida
    • Jupiter, Florida, United States, 33458
      • Health Awareness
    • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33028
      • Pines Research, LLC Pembroke Clinical Trials
    • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33782
      • DMI Healthcare Group, Inc.
    • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
      • Tampa Medical Group, P.A.
  • Georgia
    • Conyers, Georgia, United States, 30012
      • RST DAta Research
    • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30035
      • Q Clinical Research
    • Rome, Georgia, United States, 30165
      • Harbin Clinic
  • Idaho
    • Boise, Idaho, United States, 83704
      • Northwest Clinical Trials
    • Boise, Idaho, United States, 83702
      • Sonora Clinical Research, LLC
  • Illinois
    • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62704
      • The Arthritis Center
  • Indiana
    • Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47713
      • Deaconess Clinic
  • Kansas
    • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66215
      • Pinnacle Medical Research
    • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67208
      • Wichita Clinic
  • Louisiana
    • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70809
      • Dolby Research, LLC
    • Lafayette, Louisiana, United States, 70508
      • Gulf Coast Research, LLC
    • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
      • Clinical Trials Management
    • Monroe, Louisiana, United States, 71203
      • Arthritis and Diabetes Clinic
    • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71115
      • The Family Doctors
    • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71106
      • Regional Research Specialists
  • Maryland
    • Wheaton, Maryland, United States, 20902
      • Center For Rheumatology & Bone Research
  • Massachusetts
    • Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, 02453
      • MASS Research, LLC
  • Michigan
    • Clarkston, Michigan, United States, 48346
      • Clarkston Medical Group
    • Flint, Michigan, United States, 48532
      • L Kage Healthcare Services
    • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49546
      • West Michigan Rheumatology
    • Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48910
      • *Private Practice*
    • Troy, Michigan, United States, 48085
      • Oakland Medical Research Center
  • Mississippi
    • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39202
      • CRC of Jackson
    • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39202
      • Arthritis Associates Of Mississippi
    • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39209
      • Phillips Medical Center
  • Montana
    • Missoula, Montana, United States, 59808
      • Montana Medical Research
  • Nebraska
    • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
      • Quality Clinical Research
    • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68134
      • Heartland Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Nevada
    • Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89014
      • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc
  • New Jersey
    • Freehold, New Jersey, United States, 07728
      • Arthritis and Osteoporosis Associates
    • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
      • UMDNJ Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
  • New York
    • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11201
      • Arthritis and Osteoporosis Medical Association
    • Roslyn, New York, United States, 11576
      • Andrew J. Porges, MD, PC
  • North Carolina
    • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28209
      • Metrolina Medical Research
    • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28277
      • The Center for Nutrition and Preventive Medicine
    • Hickory, North Carolina, United States, 28601
      • Unifour Medical Research Associates
    • Shelby, North Carolina, United States, 28150
      • Jones Family Practice, PA
  • Ohio
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43215
      • Columbia Arthritis Center
    • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45417
      • STAT Research, Inc.
    • Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States, 44094
      • Ohio Clinical Research, LLC
    • Youngstown, Ohio, United States, 44501
      • Humility of Mary Health Partners DBA St. Elizabeth Health Ce
  • Oklahoma
    • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73109
      • Health Research Institute
    • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
      • Health Research of Oklahoma, PLLC
  • Pennsylvania
    • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
      • Altoona Center For Clinical Research
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
      • Philadelphia VA Medical Center
  • Rhode Island
    • Bumberland, Rhode Island, United States, 02864
      • Partners in Clinical Research
  • South Carolina
    • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29407
      • Medical Research South
    • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29412
      • Pharmacorp Clinical Trials, INC
    • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29204
      • TLM Medical Services LLC
    • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29601
      • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
    • Varnville, South Carolina, United States, 29924
      • Community Research Partners, Inc.
    • Varnville, South Carolina, United States, 29944
      • Community Research Partners, Inc.
  • Tennessee
    • Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620
      • Tri-Cities Medical Research
    • Clarksville, Tennessee, United States, 37403
      • Alpha Clinical Research
    • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38301
      • The Jackson Clinic
    • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
      • The Arthritis Clinic
    • Johnson City, Tennessee, United States, 37601
      • MultiSpecialty Clinical Research
  • Texas
    • Austin, Texas, United States, 78758
      • Lovelace Scientific Resource
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77004
      • Rheumatic Disease Clinical Research Center, LLC
    • Lake Jackson, Texas, United States, 77566
      • R/D Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Leander, Texas, United States, 78641
      • Leander Healthcare Center
    • Nassau Bay, Texas, United States, 77058
      • Accurate Clinical Research
    • North Richard Hills, Texas, United States, 76180
      • North Hills Family Practice
    • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78232
      • Arthritis Center South Texas
  • Virginia
    • Danville, Virginia, United States, 24541
      • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Newport News, Virginia, United States, 23606
      • Health Research of Hampton Roads

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Core Study:

Inclusion criteria:

• Meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1977 preliminary criteria for the classification of acute arthritis of primary gout
• Onset of current acute gout flare within 5 days prior to study entry
• Baseline pain intensity ≥ 50 mm on the 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)
• History of ≥ 3 gout flares within the 12 months prior to study entry
• Contraindication, or intolerance, or lack of efficacy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and/or colchicine

Exclusion criteria:

• Rheumatoid arthritis, evidence/suspicion of infectious/septic arthritis, or other acute inflammatory arthritis
• Presence of severe renal function impairment
• Use of specified pain relief medications or biologics (corticosteroids, narcotics, paracetamol/acetominophen, ibuprofen, colchicine, IL-blocker, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor within specified periods prior to study entry
• Live vaccinations within 3 months prior to randomization
• Requirement for administration of antibiotics against latent tuberculosis (TB)
• Refractory heart failure (Stage D)
• Unstable cardiac arrhythmias or unstable symptomatic coronary ischemia
• Any active or recurrent bacterial, fungal, or viral infection

Extension Study 1:

Inclusion:

- Completion of the Core study. A patient was defined as completing the core study if they completed the study up to and including visit 7.

Exclusion:

- Continuation in this extension study was considered inappropriate by the treating physician.

Extension Study 2:

Inclusion Criteria:

• Completion of the first extension study CACZ885H2357E1. A patient was defined as completing the first extension study if they completed the study up to and including Visit 10).

Exclusion Criteria:

-Continuation in this second extension study was considered inappropriate by the treating physician.

Other protocol-defined inclusion-exclusion criteria applied to the core and extension studies.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Canakinumab 150 mg; Participants received 1 subcutaneous (sc) injection of canakinumab 150 mg and 1 intramuscular (im) injection of placebo to triamcinolone acetonide on Day 1. Participants could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. Participants completing the 12 week core study could continue to be treated in a 12 week extension study for any new gout flare on demand with the same treatment as assigned in the core study. In the second extension study participants were to receive open-label on demand treatment with canakinumab 150 mg sc upon new flare for 1 year, for a total duration of 18 months.	Drug: Canakinumab 150 mg; Canakinumab 150 mg was supplied in 6 mL glass vials each containing nominally 150 mg canakinumab (plus 20% overfill).; Drug: Placebo to triamcinolone acetonide; Placebo triamcinolone acetonide was supplied as a lipid emulsion similar in appearance to triamcinolone acetonide.
Active Comparator: Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg; Participants received 1 intramuscular (im) injection of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg and 1 subcutaneous (sc) injection of placebo to canakinumab on Day 1. Participants could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. Participants completing the 12 week core study could continue to be treated in a 12 week extension study for any new gout flare on demand with the same treatment as assigned in the core study. In the second extension study participants were to switch to open-label on demand treatment with canakinumab 150 mg sc upon new flare for 1 year. Triamcinolone acetonide was not to be administered in the second extension study.	Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg; Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg was supplied as a suspension.; Drug: Placebo to canakinumab; Placebo to canakinumab was supplied in 6 mL glass vials containing placebo powder as a lyophilized cake.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis During the 12 Weeks of Study	Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: •Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) •Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.	Baseline to 12 weeks
Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 72 Hours Post-dose	Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), at 72 hours post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.	72 hours post-dose (randomization)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events During 24 Weeks	This was primary endpoint of extension study 1. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.	During 24 weeks overall
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)	This was the primary endpoint of extension study 2. An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.	72 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Time to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)	Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to at least a 50% reduction in self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline and the confidence intervals were determined along with 95% confidence interval. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.	Baseline to 7 days post-dose (randomization)
Time to Complete Resolution of Pain; Survival Analysis	Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to complete resolution of self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected and the confidence interval was determined. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). Pain was scored at Baseline; 6 and 12 hours; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.	Baseline to 7 days post-dose (randomization)
SF 36 Physical Function Score at Week 12	SF-36 measures impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). 36-item survey has 8 subscales that can be aggregated into physical and mental component summary scores. Scores are standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment group and baseline SF-36 physical function subscore as covariates.	Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks of the Study	The percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 new gout flare during the 12 week study treatment period.	Baseline to Week 12
Pharmacokinetic Concentrations	Canakinumab concentration was analyzed in serum by means of a competitive Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay with a lower limit of quantification (LOQ) at 100 ng/mL.	12 weeks post-dose
Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm VAS)	Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), from 6 hours to 7 days post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.	6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours; and 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose (randomization)
Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Last Post-Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)	Patient's assessment of gout pain intensity in the most affected joint (on a 0-100 mm VAS) for the last post-baseline flare, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), was summarized up to 7 days after receiving a re-dose of study drug by time point. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The covariance analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score at that flare, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.	6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours; and 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose for last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).
Time to the First New Gout Flare During 24 Weeks	Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of the time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. Participants met the definition of a new flare if they had: Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study); Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.	From randomization to the end of the first extension period (24 weeks).
Mean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During 24 Weeks	Patients met definition of new flare if they had: Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint(at baseline or during study); Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.	24 weeks
Time to First Intake of Rescue Medication	Participants who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed.; If they had insufficient pain relief, participants were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare. Use of these treatments during the first 7 days of a gout flare was recorded as rescue medication. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to first intake of rescue medication, in hours, and the confidence interval were determined for the flare experienced at study entry (Baseline flare) and the last new flare (last post-baseline flare) that occurred up until the end of the first extension period (24 weeks).	For 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).
Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication	Participants who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed.; If they had insufficient pain relief, participants were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare. Use of these treatments during the first 7 days of a gout flare was recorded as rescue medication.	For 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken	Patients who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed.; If they had insufficient pain relief, patients were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare.	For 7 days after the first dose for the baseline flare and 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).
Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment	The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The physician completed the assessment without viewing any of the patient's own assessments (pain intensity and patient's global assessment of response to treatment).	72 hours post-dose and 24-weeks post-dose.
Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment	Participants made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.	72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose
Physician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint	The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Tenderness on a 0-3 point scale: No pain, patient states that "there is pain", patient states "there is pain and winces", and patient states "there is pain, winces, and withdraws" on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint; Swelling on a 0-3 point scale: No swelling, palpable, visible, and bulging beyond the joint margins; and Erythema: Present or absent. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.	72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose
Physician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint	The study physician assessed the range of motion of the most affected joint for range of motion on a 5-point Likert scale: Normal, mildly restricted, moderately restricted, severely restricted, immobilized. The percentage of participants in each category is reported.	72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels	High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analyses were measured by a central laboratory. The analysis included treatment group, log-transformed protein level at baseline, and body mass index (BMI) at baseline as covariates.	72 hours after the first dose for the baseline flare and 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).
Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint	Participant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme).	72 hours post-dose and 24 weeks post-dose
Percentage of Patients With Maximum Severity of New Gout Flares as Severe or Extreme	For each new flare, participants scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of the new flare and the time they were re-dosed on a 5 point Likert scale as None, Mild, Moderate, Severe or Extreme. The percentage of participants with a maximum new flare severity of severe or extreme is reported for the first post-baseline flare that occurred during the 12-week core study and for the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension period.	From the onset of a new flare until re-dosing. First post-baseline new flare during 12 week core study and the last post-baseline flare that occurred up until the end of the first extension study (24 weeks).
Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment Over 72 Weeks	Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study); Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.	From randomization to the end of the second extension period (72 weeks).
Flare Rate Per Year	Flare rate was calculated as the number of new flares over the period of observation in years. Flare rate was calculated using only those new flares before switching to canakinumab. Participants met the definition of new flare if they had: Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study); Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Participants did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely. Flare rates were estimated from a negative binomial model with body mass index at baseline as a covariate.	From randomization to the end of the second extension period (72 weeks).
Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab	Participants scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe or extreme). Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.
Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab	Participants made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight or poor. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.
Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab	The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: very good, good, fair, poor or very poor. The physician completed the physician's global assessment of response to treatment without viewing any of the patient's assessments. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.
Physician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab	The study physician assessed the most affected joint for tenderness on the following 4-point scale: no pain;; participant states that "there is pain;; participant states "there is pain and winces";; participant states "there is pain, winces and withdraws" on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.
Physician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab	The study physician assessed the most affected joint for swelling on the following 4-point scale: no swelling;; palpable;; visible;; bulging beyond the joint margins. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.
Physician's Assessment of Erythema for Participants Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab	The study physician assessed the most affected joint for erythema (redness of the skin) as either present, absent or not assessable. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	72 hours post-dose and 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab	High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in blood serum were measured by a central laboratory in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.
Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Participants Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab	Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) levels in blood serum were measured by a central laboratory in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Data are reported for the last post-baseline flare for participants who were randomized to and re-treated with canakinumab, and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for participants randomized to triamcinolone acetonide and who were switched to canakinumab in extension study 2.	24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for the canakinumab re-treated arm and for the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab in the triamcinolone acetonide arm during the overall 72 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Chakraborty A, Van LM, Skerjanec A, Floch D, Klein UR, Krammer G, Sunkara G, Howard D. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of canakinumab in patients with gouty arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Dec;53(12):1240-51. doi: 10.1002/jcph.162. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: March 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): November 1, 2010
• Study Completion (Actual): October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 2, 2010
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 2, 2010
• First Posted (Estimate): March 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): January 30, 2014
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 24, 2013
• Last Verified: April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Gout; Frequent flares; Anti-interleukin-1β monoclonal antibody
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Metabolic Diseases; Genetic Diseases, Inborn; Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Arthritis; Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Crystal Arthropathies; Purine-Pyrimidine Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Gout; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Immunosuppressive Agents; Immunologic Factors; Glucocorticoids; Hormones; Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists; Triamcinolone; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Triamcinolone Acetonide; Triamcinolone hexacetonide; Triamcinolone diacetate
• Other Study ID Numbers: CACZ885H2357; 2010-018913-32 (EudraCT Number); CACZ885H2357E1 (Other Identifier: Novartis)