- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01116362
Comparing Primary With Secondary Repair of Based on Electrodiagnostic Assessment and Clinical Examination
May 19, 2010 updated by: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Study of Surgical Methods for Repair of Clean Transections in Peripheral Nerve Injuries
The purpose of this study is to determine which surgical approach is better for clean transection injury in peripheral nerves in outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Treatment of injuries to major nerve trunks in the hand and upper extremity remains a major and challenging reconstructive problem.
Our goal was to compare primary versus secondary repair of median and\or ulnar nerve by electrodiagnostic assessment and clinical examination.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
46
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Isfahan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Al-Zahra University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with confirmed clean transection injury between shoulder and wrist
Exclusion Criteria:
- crush injuries
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
OTHER: secondary repair
secondary closure beyond the first week.the
nerve was conducted to repair as end to end (epi-epineurium, epi-epineurium) anastomosis.
This was performed following the repair of present tendons and muscle injuries.
|
after one week,the nerve was conducted to repair as end to end (epi-epineurium, epi-epineurium) anastomosis.
This was performed following the repair of present tendons and muscle injuries.
Other Names:
|
OTHER: primary repair
during first days,the nerve was conducted to repair as end to end (epi-epineurium, epi-epineurium) anastomosis.
This was performed following the repair of present tendons and muscle injuries.
|
during the first days,the nerve was conducted to repair as end to end (epi-epineurium, epi-epineurium) anastomosis.
This was performed following the repair of present tendons and muscle injuries.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
motor function
Time Frame: at 18 months post-operatively
|
identification of motor level were done based on British Medical Research Council guided.The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) was used for the median nerve and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) for the ulnar nerve.
as follows: 0, M0, M1 and M2; 1, M3; 2, M4.
|
at 18 months post-operatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
sensory recovery
Time Frame: at 18 months post-operatively
|
identification of motor and sensory level were done based on British Medical Research Council guided.The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) was used for the median nerve and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) for the ulnar nerve.
The results scored as follows: 0, S0, S1 and S2; 1, S3; 2, S4 and S5.
|
at 18 months post-operatively
|
nerve conduction velocity
Time Frame: at 18 months post-operatively
|
For electrodiagnostic assessment, nerve conduction velocity (NCV) was tested as motor and sensory.
The results categorized according to the Yale sensory scale and the severity of sensation and function of the nerves was scored as follows: 0, no sensation; 1, decreased or abnormal sensation; 2, normal sensation.
|
at 18 months post-operatively
|
electromyography
Time Frame: at 18 months post-operatively
|
For an EMG, a needle electrode was inserted through the skin into the muscle which injured nerve supplied.
The presence, size and shape of the waveform registered and the ability of the muscle to respond when the nerves were stimulated.
Also these results scored as follows: 0, no activity; 1, few or single movement; 2, partial activity; 3, full activity.
|
at 18 months post-operatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2009
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 3, 2010
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 5, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 20, 2010
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 19, 2010
Last Verified
March 1, 2008
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ASD-1213-2
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peripheral Nerve Injury
-
Checkpoint Surgical Inc.Congressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsRecruitingNerve Injury | Peripheral Nerve Injuries | Nerve Palsy | Peripheral Nerve Injury Upper LimbUnited States
-
Lund University HospitalRecruitingNerve Injury | Peripheral Nerve InjuriesSweden
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedPeripheral Nerve Injury, Virtual Reality, RehabilitationTurkey
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedPeripheral Nerve Injury at Forearm Level (Diagnosis)Taiwan
-
W. Dalton DietrichThe Miami Project to Cure ParalysisNo longer availableSciatic Nerve InjuryUnited States
-
Silk Biomaterials srlUnknownPeripheral Nerve Injury Digital Nerve HandSwitzerland
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityWithdrawnNerve Injury | Peripheral Nerve Injury
-
Major Extremity Trauma Research ConsortiumActive, not recruitingPeripheral Nerve Injury(Ies)United States
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompletedPeripheral Nerve Injury Digital Nerve Hand LeftSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on secondary repair
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)CompletedCleft Lip and Palate | Cleft LipUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisActive, not recruitingAxillary Hidradenitis SuppurativaFrance
-
Integra LifeSciences CorporationCompleted
-
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian...CompletedHypertrophic Obstructive CardiomyopathyRussian Federation
-
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteCompletedOvarian CancerNetherlands
-
Carilion ClinicTerminatedAortic Stenosis | Aortic Valve Disease | Vascular Access ComplicationUnited States
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiUganda Heart InstituteCompletedRheumatic Heart DiseaseUganda
-
Cereneo AGTerminatedStroke, IschemicSwitzerland
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingLens Implantation, IntraocularChina
-
Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang UniversityRecruiting