Use of Compression Glove to Prevent Complications After Distal Radius Fractures: a Randomized Controlled Trial

October 13, 2020 updated by: Michael Shuler, J&M Shuler

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common type of fracture in the human body, and a large proportion of DRFs result in complications. Previously proposed preventive strategies have questionable efficacy and may impose additional risks on the patient. Because many complications secondary to distal radius fractures are associated with excessive swelling, a prophylactic means for edema reduction could dramatically reduce morbidity among this population. A compression glove is a non-invasive, non-pharmacological way to reduce edema. Previous studies have confirmed its utility in edema reduction after hand trauma and among patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, but none have sufficiently investigated the application to patients with distal radius fractures, a population in which this intervention could have a large impact. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to evaluate use of a compression glove during recovery among patients who have sustained an unstable distal radius fracture. The investigators hypothesize that patients who wear a compression glove after a distal radius fracture:

  • Will experience less edema
  • Will demonstrate greater functionality
  • Will recover more quickly
  • Will have lower incidence rates of carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Will have lower incidence rates of complex regional pain syndrome

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients will be recruited from the principle investigator's practice at Athens Orthopedic Clinic. As the only hand and upper-extremity surgeon in the Athens-Clarke county metro area, principle investigator performs the majority of this type of surgery for patients in Athens and surrounding cities. Therefore, the study population should be largely representative of the target population.

Procedures:

  1. Patient Identification: Patient presents with distal radius fracture.

    1. An x-ray is taken to decide whether the fracture requires surgical stabilization.
    2. Unstable distal radius fractures will be based on the following criteria:

1. Radial shortening <5 mm at the DRUJ compared with the contralateral side 2. Radial inclination on the posteroanterior radiographs > 15⁰ 3. Sagittal tilt on the lateral projection between 15⁰ dorsal tilt and 20⁰ volar tilt 4. Intra-articular step-off or gap <2 mm of the radiocarpal joint 5. Articular incongruity <2 mm of the sigmoid notch of the distal radius 2. Screening: Patients whose fracture is unstable will be assessed for eligibility using the aforementioned criteria.

3. Consent and de-identification: Patients who are deemed evaluable based on the eligibility criteria will be asked if they are interested in participating in a research study.

  1. Those who are interested will meet with a member of the study team, who will explain the study and answer any questions the patient might have.
  2. The participant will be given two (2) copies of the informed consent form and HIPAA authorization form. One copy of each document will be signed and returned to the study team, to be kept in a secure location, and the other copy will be given to the participant for his/her records.
  3. Each study participant will be assigned a unique study identification number in order to keep his/her identity anonymous. The participant's name and study ID will be recorded on the first page of the case report form, which is detached and kept in a locked filing cabinet immediately following consent. All subsequent data collection will be recorded on the data collection form at follow-up visits with the principle investigator. Data will be entered into a secure, de-identified database by a member of the study team, using the patient's study ID as an identifier. The database will not contain any information that may be used to identify the patient. 4. Surgery: All fractures will be stabilized by volar plate fixation or closed reduction percutaneous pinning using a distal volar radial locking plate or other appropriate implant. 5. Randomization: To avoid any potential bias on the part of the surgeon, patients will be randomized postoperatively to receive either the investigational (glove) or control (no glove) intervention. Therefore, the surgeon will be blinded to intervention status until after patient enrollment and surgical stabilization. 6. Post-surgery: The wound will be dressed steriley, per standard protocol. Initial sterile cast padding will be placed over sterile dressing. For patients in the investigational group, the compression glove will be applied over cast padding, followed by additional padding and then a splint. Patients in the control group will be dressed identically, with the exception of glove application. The splint will be applied for two weeks post-surgery and removal of the splint and application of a short-arm cast will occur at five weeks post-surgery. Additional post-surgical procedures are as follows:

a. 2 weeks- splint is removed; glove is taken off for edema measurements (investigational group); short- arm cast is applied b. 5 weeks- short-arm cast is removed; patient can continue to wear compression glove on an as-needed basis; patient is given post-operative exercise handout c. 3 months- patients meet with study physician for routine follow-up visit d. 6 months- patients meet with study physician for final follow-up visit; once fully healed, patient is given option of having plates removed 7. Therapy: Patients will be given a handout explaining post-operative exercises to be performed at home during recovery.

  1. In addition, participants will attend therapy twice weekly, beginning five weeks from surgery. Duration of therapy will be as-needed at the therapist's discretion. Discharge from therapy will be based on the therapist's assessment that the patient has recovered to the extent that they can continue an exercise program at home.
  2. Patients who stop coming to therapy prior to discharge will be contacted by the therapists and asked to provide his/her primary reason for not returning. 8. Outcome assessment: outcomes will be assessed at each of four follow-up visits, occurring two weeks, six weeks, three months, and six months from surgery. These coincide with regular post-operative visits, so as to minimize loss to follow-up. Each visit will assess each of the outcome measurements explained in later sections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Athens, Georgia, United States, 30606
        • Athens Orthopedic Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • Between the ages of 18-85
  • Patients with unstable unilateral distal radius fractures (requiring surgical stabilization)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing cases of carpal tunnel syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome
  • Nerve or tendon laceration
  • Decompression of carpal tunnel concomitant with surgical stabilization
  • Additional fractures, including carpal fractures, more proximal fractures of the radius, and finger injuries will be excluded from the study (Ulnar styloid and ulnar head and neck fractures will be included)
  • Uncontrolled rheumatoid arthritis patients
  • Bilateral fractures
  • Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Compression glove
Patients in this group have a compression glove incorporated into their splint for 2 weeks post-op, and wear a glove underneath their cast for 3 weeks. The patient then wears the glove at night after cast removal.
A compression glove worn during recovery from distal radius fracture
No Intervention: Control
Patients in this group undergo standard recovery procedures. This includes a splint worn for 2 weeks post-op, followed by a short arm cast worn for the next 3 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Post-traumatic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
Time Frame: 2 wks-24 wks
Confirmed cases of Post-traumatic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
2 wks-24 wks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Edema
Time Frame: 2 wks- 24 weeks
Circumference of Wrist/Finger by Glove or No Glove
2 wks- 24 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 2 wks-24 wks
Count of participants (by group) that were capable or full extension or flexion at each encounter.
2 wks-24 wks
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 5 wks-24 wks
Grip strength measured using a hand dynamometer at each visit except @ 2-weeks; grip strength was not measured at 2-weeks because of post-op activity restrictions recommended by the treating physician
5 wks-24 wks
DASH Score
Time Frame: 2 wks- 24 wks
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) is 30-item questionnaire designed to quanitfy functional outcomes of the upper extremity and measure symptoms of pain, physical, emotional, and social domains associated with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Scores can range from 0-100 with 0 indicating NO disability and 100 indicating extreme disability.
2 wks- 24 wks
Pain on Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2 wks- 24 wks
Assessment of pain using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain
2 wks- 24 wks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Shuler, MD, J&M Shuler

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edema

Clinical Trials on Compression glove

3
Subscribe