Thrombolysis or Anticoagulation for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (TOACT)

February 11, 2017 updated by: Jan Stam, MD, PhD

Thrombolysis or Anticoagulation for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (TOACT)

Background: Endovascular thrombolysis, with or without mechanical clot removal (ET), may be beneficial for a subgroup of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT), who have a poor prognosis despite treatment with heparin. Published experience with ET is promising, but only based on case series and not on controlled trials.

Objective: The main objective of the TO-ACT trial is to determine if ET improves the functional outcome of patients with a severe form of CVT

Study design: The TO-ACT trial will be designed as a multi-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial.

Study population: Patients are eligible if they have a radiologically proven CVT, a high probability of poor outcome (defined by presence of one or more of the following risk factors: mental status disorder, coma, intracranial hemorrhagic lesion or thrombosis of the deep cerebral venous system) and the responsible physician is uncertain if ET or standard anti-coagulant treatment is better.

Intervention: Patients will be randomized to receive either ET or standard therapy (therapeutic doses of heparin). ET consists of local application of alteplase or urokinase within the thrombosed sinuses, and/or mechanical thrombectomy. Glasgow coma score, NIH stroke scale and relevant laboratory parameters will be assessed at baseline.

Endpoints: The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 12 months. The most important secondary outcomes are the mRS, mortality and recanalization rate at 6 months. Major intra- and extracranial hemorrhagic complications within one week following the intervention are the principal safety outcome. Results will be analyzed according to the "intention-to-treat" principle. Assessment of study endpoints will be carried out according to standardized questionnaires by a blinded neurologist or research nurse who is not involved in the treatment of the patient.

Study size: To detect a 50% relative reduction in mRS≥2 (from 40 to 20%), 164 patients (82 in each treatment arm) have to be included (two-sided alpha, 80% power).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Included patients may benefit directly from ET. Complications of ET, most notably intracranial hemorrhages, constitute the most important risk of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montréal, Canada
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
      • Beijing, China
        • Xuanwu Hospital
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Lariboisiere
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Academic Medical Centre
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • University Medical Centre Groningen
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands
        • St. Antonius Hospital
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus Medical Centre
      • The Hague, Netherlands
        • Haga Hospital
      • The Hague, Netherlands
        • Medical Centre Haaglanden
      • Braga, Portugal
        • Hospital de Braga
      • Coimbra, Portugal
        • Hospital da Universidade de Coimbra
      • Lisbon, Portugal
        • Hospital Santa Maria
      • Lisbon, Portugal
        • Hospital Sao Jose hospital
      • Porto, Portugal
        • Hospital de Santo António
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Inselspital, University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cerebral venous thrombosis, confirmed by cerebral angiography (with intra-arterial contrast injection), magnetic resonance venography or computed tomographic venography.
  2. Severe form of CVT with a high chance of incomplete recovery, as defined by the presence of one or more of the following risk factors

    1. Intracerebral hemorrhagic lesion due to CVT
    2. Mental status disorder
    3. Coma (Glasgow coma scale < 9)
    4. Thrombosis of the deep cerebral venous system
  3. Uncertainty by the treating physician if ET or standard heparin therapy is the optimal therapy for the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Duration from diagnosis to randomization of more than 10 days
  • Recurrent CVT
  • Any thrombolytic therapy within last 7 days
  • Pregnancy (women in the puerperium may be included)
  • Isolated cavernous sinus thrombosis
  • Isolated intracranial hypertension (without focal neurological signs, with the exception of papilloedema and 6th cranial nerve palsy)
  • Cerebellar venous thrombosis with 4th ventricle compression and hydrocephalus, which requires surgery
  • Contraindication for anti-coagulant or thrombolytic treatment

    1. documented generalized bleeding disorder
    2. concurrent thrombocytopenia (<100 x 10E9/L)
    3. documented severe hepatic or renal dysfunction, that interferes with normal coagulation
    4. uncontrolled severe hypertension (diastolic > 120 mm Hg)
    5. known recent (< 3 months) gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage (not including he¬morrhage from rectal hemorrhoids)
  • Any known associated condition (such as terminal cancer) with a poor short term (1 year) prognosis independent of CVT
  • Clinical and radiological signs of impending transtentorial herniation due to large space-occupying lesions (e.g. large cerebral venous infarcts or hemorrhages)
  • Recent (< 2 weeks) major surgical procedure (does not include lumbar puncture) or severe cranial trauma
  • Known allergy against contrast fluid used during endovascular procedures or the thrombolytic drug used in that particular centre
  • Previously legally incompetent prior to CVT
  • No informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard treatment
The patients randomized to standard care will receive (or continue) either intravenous adjusted dose unfractionated heparin (aPTT value kept within 1.5 to 2.5 times the normal value), or any type of body-weight adjusted low molecular weight heparin in therapeutic dose, according to local custom and international guidelines
Experimental: Endovascular thrombolysis
Endovascular thrombolysis consists of local application of alteplase or urokinase within the thrombosed sinuses. Standard endovascular techniques to mechanically remove clot material, such as thrombosuction, are allowed, but not mandatory.
Other Names:
  • Alteplase
  • Urokinase

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin score 0-1)
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
Outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mortality included) at 12 months after randomization is considered the primary study outcome to determine the efficacy of thrombolytic treatment. For the primary endpoint the mRS will be dichotomized between 1 and 2 (i.e. incomplete recovery is defined as a score of 2 or higher, including death).
12 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All cause mortality
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin score 0-1)
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
6 months after randomization
Recanalization rate of cerebral venous system
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Required surgical intervention in relation to CVT
Time Frame: 6 months
The proportion of surgical intervention that are required in relation to cerebral venous thrombosis (e.g. ventricular shunting procedures or craniotomy)
6 months
Major extracranial and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic complications
Time Frame: 1 week after randomization
Extracranial hemorrhage is classified as major if clinically overt and associated with fall in hemoglobin of 1.2 mmol/l (2 gram/dl) or more within 48 hours, if it is retroperitoneal, intracranial or intraocular, or requires a transfusion of two or more units of packed cells. Any bleeding requiring operation or leading to death is regarded as major. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage is defined as any apparently extravascular blood in the brain associated with an increase of 4 points or more on the NIHSS score, or leading to death.
1 week after randomization
Dead or dependency (modified Rankin score 3-6)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
6 and 12 months
Modified Rankin Scale at 1 month after randomization
Time Frame: 1 month after randomization
1 month after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interim analyses: Favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin score 0-1)
Time Frame: After inclusion of 1/3rd and 2/3rd of patients

The DSMB will perform two interim analyses after 55 and 110 patients (1/3rd and 2/3rd of all patients) have been randomized and completed the 12-month follow-up evaluation. As a stopping rule for efficacy, the Haybittle-Peto method will be used:

  • Interim analysis 1: p = 0,001
  • Interim analysis 2: p = 0,001

In addition, the DSMB will assess futility during the interim analyses. The trial will be discontinued for futility if the conditional power (or probability of observing a statistically significant result in favor of the intervention group given the data obtained so far) is below 20%. This conditional power will be calculated under the assumption that in the remaining two-thirds/one-thirds of the study population the distributions of the primary endpoint will be the same as observed at the interim analysis.

For the interim analyses the DSMB will use the primary outcome measure (modified Rankin score 0-1 at 12 months) for the determination of efficacy and futility.

After inclusion of 1/3rd and 2/3rd of patients

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jan Stam, MD, PhD, University of Amsterdam
  • Principal Investigator: Jose M Ferro, MD, PhD, Hospital Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Germaine Bousser, MD, PhD, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France
  • Principal Investigator: Patricia Canhão, MD, PhD, Hospital Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Principal Investigator: Isabelle Crassard, MD, PhD, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France
  • Principal Investigator: Charles BL Majoie, MD, PhD, University of Amsterdam
  • Principal Investigator: Jim A Reekers, MD, PhD, University of Amsterdam
  • Principal Investigator: E Houdart, MD, PhD, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France
  • Principal Investigator: Rob J de Haan, PhD, University of Amsterdam

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial

Clinical Trials on Endovascular thrombolysis

3
Subscribe