The Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir Treatment of Patients With Acute on Chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure

December 6, 2010 updated by: Sun Yat-sen University

A Prospective Open Label Control Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir Treatment of Patients With Acute on Chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure

To evaluate therapeutic efficacy and predicting factors of entecavir for treating patients with acute on chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACHBLF). A total of 108 patients with ACHBLF were allocated into either a treatment group (ETV group, n=53) or a control group (n=55). The HBV DNA level, liver function and survival condition of the patients were observed for 48 weeks after enrollment. The factors possibly related to entecavir treatment efficacy were also identified.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510630
        • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ACHBLF was diagnosed according to the criteria from the APASL in March 200815 and the program of Prevention and Cure for Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease amended by the National Symposium on Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease in September 2000.
  • age >18 years
  • HBV DNA > 3log10 copy/mL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Diagnosed or suspected as hepatic carcinoma patients.
  • Cases with any serious disease besides CHB, including heart disease, immunologic disease, malignant tumor, etc.
  • Patients hypersensitive to nucleoside or nucleoside (acid) analogues or with a history nucleoside antiviral drug treatment.
  • A history of drug abuse or alcohol abuse.
  • Hepatic encephalopathy degree IV patients who were unable to take orally administered drugs.
  • A history of using immunomodulator including steroids
  • Conclusive evidence of other co infection s: anti-HAV-IgM positive, anti-HCV positive, anti-HEV positive, anti-HIV positive, autoimmunity liver diseases, Wilson disease, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
The patients were prescribed the tradition comprehensive medical treatment without entecavir.
bed rest, sufficient energy and vitamins, reduced glutathione, prostaglandin E1, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), plasma and albumin, maintenance of water and electrolyte balance, and prevention and treatment of complications, such as infections, hepatic encephalopathy, hemorrhage, hepatorenal syndrome and ascites.
Experimental: ETV group
All the patients were prescribed the tradition comprehensive medical treatment with entecavir. Entecavir was supplied by the Sino-US Shanghai Squibb Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Patients took 0.5 mg entecavir following oral fasting one time per day.
Patients in the ETV Group were prescribed 0.5 mg entecavir following oral fasting one time per day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV DNA level and liver function
Time Frame: 48 weeks
HBV DNA level,serum alanine transaminase (ALT), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TB), prothrombin time international normalize ratio (INR), cholesterol (CHOL)
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Symptoms,signs and mortality
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lin B Liang, MD, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2010

Last Verified

August 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Failure

Clinical Trials on Traditional comprehensive medical treatment

3
Subscribe