Study of Mapatumumab in Combination With Sorafenib in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

November 28, 2018 updated by: Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company

A Randomized, Multi-Center, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study Of Mapatumumab ([HGS1012], A Fully Monoclonal Antibody To TRAIL-R1) In Combination With Sorafenib As A First-Line Therapy In Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Mapatumumab is a fully human, agonist monoclonal antibody that activates the cell death pathway in tumor cells by specifically binding to TRAIL-R1 with high affinity. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, is the standard of care for treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The mechanisms of sorafenib and mapatumumab action suggest that these agents could interact synergistically. This is a Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab in combination with sorafenib in subjects with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Bayern
      • Muenchen, Bayern, Germany, 81377
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Hessen
      • Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany, 60590
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Niedersachsen
      • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80-952
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Olsztyn, Poland, 10-228
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Poznan, Poland, 61-878
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Szczecin, Poland, 71-730
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-507
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 04-125
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00927
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Bucuresti, Romania, 022328
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 400015
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Craiova, Romania, 200385
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Iasi, Romania, 700483
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620036
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420029
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660133
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125284
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 195067
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation, 357502
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • St-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194017
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 198255
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150054
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49044
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Donetsk, Ukraine, 83092
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 03039
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lviv, Ukraine, 79031
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Uzhhorod, Ukraine, 88014
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Zaporizhia, Ukraine, 69032
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71103
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Mississippi
      • Tupelo, Mississippi, United States, 38801
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033-0850
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033-
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child-Pugh Class A.
  • Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) advanced stage (C) hepatocellular carcinoma, or BCLC intermediate stage (B) hepatocellular carcinoma if treatment with transarterial chemoembolization is not considered appropriate
  • Measurable disease demonstrating intratumoral arterial enhancement by contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT), with use of multislice scanners, or contrast enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with at least 1 tumor lesion that meets the following criteria: located in the liver; can be accurately measured in at least 1 dimension; well delineated area of viable, hypervascular (contrast enhancement in the arterial phase) tumor that is >2 centimeter (cm) in the axial plane; suitable for repeat measurement; OR not previously treated with locoregional or systemic treatment unless the lesion shows a well-delineated area of viable (contrast enhancement in the arterial phase) tumor that is >2 cm in the axial plane. (If the lesion is poorly demarcated or exhibits atypical enhancement as a result of the previous intervention, then it cannot be selected as a target lesion)
  • Radiologic eligibility (measurable disease) must be must be confirmed by the BICR prior to randomization.
  • Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function as defined in the protocol.
  • Performance status of 0, 1 or 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent (including consent for the use and disclosure of research-related health information), and comply with the study and follow-up procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any co-morbid condition that in the judgment of the investigator renders the subject at high risk of treatment complications or reduces the possibility of assessing clinical effect.
  • Received prior investigational or non-investigational cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biological therapy (including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies, small molecules or other immunotherapy) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • History of organ allograft.
  • Previously received mapatumumab or sorafenib.
  • Underwent resection, radiofrequency ablation, radiation or chemoembolization within 4 weeks before enrollment or not recovered from such treatments.
  • Need for concomitant anticancer therapy (surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiofrequency ablation) or other investigational agents during the study treatment period.
  • Major surgery (i.e., the opening of a major body cavity, requiring the use of general anesthesia) within 4 weeks before enrollment; minor surgery (except for insertion of vascular access device) within 2 weeks before enrollment; or not yet recovered from the effects of the surgery.
  • Systemic steroids within 1 week before enrollment except steroids used as part of an antiemetic regimen or maintenance-dose steroids for non-cancerous disease.
  • Hepatic encephalopathy, per the investigator's evaluation.
  • History of clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding requiring procedural intervention (e.g., variceal banding, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure, arterial embolization, topical coagulation therapy) within 4 weeks before enrollment.
  • Gastrointestinal disease resulting in an inability to take oral medication or a requirement for intravenous hyperalimentation.
  • History of any infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics within 2 weeks before enrollment.
  • Known brain or spinal cord metastases unless adequately treated (surgery or radiotherapy) with no evidence of progression and neurologically stable off anticonvulsants and steroids.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus infection.
  • Unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, >= Class II congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association Classification for Congestive Heart Failure within 6 months before enrollment.
  • Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy other than beta blockers or digoxin.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >150 millimeters of mercury [mmHg] or diastolic pressure >90 mmHg despite optimal medical management).
  • Using and unable to discontinue use of concomitant strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., including but not limited to St. John's Wort, dexamethasone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin, rifabutin, phenobarbital)
  • Pregnant female or nursing mother. All females with an intact uterus (unless amenorrheic for the 24 months before enrollment) must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening. All non-sterile or non-postmenopausal females must practice a medically accepted method of contraception over the course of the study and for 60 days after the last dose of study agent.
  • Males who do not agree to use effective contraception during the study and for a period of 60 days following the final dose of study agent.
  • Subject is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending other investigational device or drug study(s) or subject is receiving other investigational agents.
  • Acute or chronic severe renal insufficiency (glomoerular filtration rate <30 milliliters [mL]/minute/1.73 square meters) or acute renal insufficiency of any severity due to the hepato-renal syndrome.
  • Hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels >2,000 international units/mL.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sorafenib plus mapatumumab
Mapatumumab 30 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle (i.e. every 21 days) plus sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each cycle until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Mapatumumab will be supplied as a lyophilized formulation in 10 mL vials containing 100 mg mapatumumab for intravenous infusion at the dose of 30 mg/kg.
Sorafenib will be supplied as tablets, each containing 274 mg sorafenib tosylate, equivalent to 200 mg of sorafenib, to be administered 400 mg (2 x 200 mg tablets) orally twice daily.
Placebo Comparator: Sorafenib plus Placebo
Placebo intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle (i.e. every 21 days) plus sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each cycle until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Sorafenib will be supplied as tablets, each containing 274 mg sorafenib tosylate, equivalent to 200 mg of sorafenib, to be administered 400 mg (2 x 200 mg tablets) orally twice daily.
Normal saline solution for intravenous infusion will be administered as placebo for mapatumumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Progression-Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to radiologic disease progression based on blinded independent review (BICR) of imaging scans using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors assessment (mRECIST) for hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. The median time to progression is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. Analysis was performed on the modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent (mapatumumab/placebo and/or sorafenib) with participants analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Progression-Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to radiologic disease progression. The primary analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods based on application of mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The median time to progression is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Median Overall Survival
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Overall survival is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. The median overall survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Progression Free Survival-BICR Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Progression free survival is defined as time from randomization to radiologic disease progression or death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods using BICR assessment of imaging scans. The median progression free survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Progression Free Survival-Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Progression free survival is defined as time from randomization to radiologic disease progression or death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods based on application of mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The median progression free survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response-BICR Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma using BICR assessment of imaging scans. The percentage of participants with objective response is reported along with 95% confidence interval.
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response-Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The percentage of participants with objective response is reported along with 95% confidence interval.
Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control-BICR Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Disease control rate is the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response+stable disease according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. The end point was based on BICR assessment of imaging scans. The percentage of participants with disease control is presented along with 95% confidence interval.
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control-Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Disease control rate is the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response+stable disease according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The percentage of participants with disease control is presented along with 95% confidence interval.
Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months
Time to Response-BICR Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Time to response is defined as time from randomization to first partial response or complete response in responders only. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Duration of Response-BICR Assessment
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Duration of response is defined as time from first PR or CR to radiologic disease progression; in responders only. CR: Disappearance of intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. Progressive disease (PD): An increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since treatment started.
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 months
An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that is temporally associated with the use of a study agent but is not necessarily caused by the study agent. An SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization, prolongation of an existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or other medically important events that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes mentioned before. A treatment-emergent AE is an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent pre-treatment, or worsened relative to the pre-treatment state. As-Treated Population comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 months
Number of Participants With Severe AEs
Time Frame: Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 months
An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that is temporally associated with the use of a study agent but is not necessarily caused by the study agent. Severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 represents death related to AE. Severe AE is defined as AEs classified by investigator as severe (causing inability to carry out usual activities), life threatening or fatal using NCI-CTCAE Version 4.0 grading.
Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 months
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Time Frame: Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 months
Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of following chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), amylase, bilirubin, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), calcium, potassium, magnesium, albumin, sodium and creatinine. Laboratory toxicities were graded based on the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Number of participants with worst toxicity grades for any abnormalities observed in any chemistry parameters during the study is presented.
Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 months
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Time Frame: Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 months
Blood samples were collected for assessment of the following hematology parameters: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), hemoglobin, international normalized ratio (INR), lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets and white blood cells (WBC). Laboratory toxicities were graded based on the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Number of participants with worst toxicity grades for any abnormalities observed in any hematology parameters during the study is presented.
Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 months
Number of Participants With Anti-mapatumumab Antibodies
Time Frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of serum antibodies. The presence of anti-mapatumumab antibodies was assessed using a validated electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. The assay incorporated a tiered testing approach which used screening and confirmation steps. The anti-drug antibody (ADA) confirmed positive participants were separated into transient or persistent antibody positives. Persistent positive refers to positive immunogenic response at 2 or more assessments or at the final assessment. Transient positive refers to positive immunogenic response at only 1 assessment and negative at the final assessment.
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
SBP and DBP were obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Heart rate was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Temperature
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Temperature was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Respiratory rate was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose.Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Weight
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Weight was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
Time Frame: Day1 pre-dose(Cycle 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,14,16,17,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);end of infusion (Cycle 1);Day8 pre-dose(Cycle 1);Day15 pre-dose (Cycle 1,2);Day21(Cycle 2,4,6,8,9,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);Cycle 99(end of treatment) (21-day cycles)
Blood samples were collected for determination of serum mapatumumab concentration at the indicated time points. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time points.
Day1 pre-dose(Cycle 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,14,16,17,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);end of infusion (Cycle 1);Day8 pre-dose(Cycle 1);Day15 pre-dose (Cycle 1,2);Day21(Cycle 2,4,6,8,9,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);Cycle 99(end of treatment) (21-day cycles)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 8, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: 200149
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  2. Informed Consent Form
    Information identifier: 200149
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  3. Statistical Analysis Plan
    Information identifier: 200149
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  4. Clinical Study Report
    Information identifier: 200149
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  5. Individual Participant Data Set
    Information identifier: 200149
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  6. Dataset Specification
    Information identifier: 200149
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Clinical Trials on Mapatumumab

Subscribe