Health Information Technology to Support Clinical Decision Making in Obesity Care

January 20, 2011 updated by: Arizona State University

The purpose of this study is to address priority Research Area 3 in PAR-08-270: Health information technology (HIT) to improve health care decision making through the use of integrated data and knowledge management. The proposed study will evaluate the use of HIT for clinician decision support and tailored patient education on the implementation of the current guidelines for the prevention of obesity-related chronic conditions in health disparity populations of poor, minority youth who access care through SBHCs. The specific aims are:

  1. To evaluate the effectiveness of web-based training with and without computerized clinical decision support on provider's process and outcome behaviors related to implementing the current guidelines for prevention of obesity and related conditions.

    a. Process variables include the following: i. Provider knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to implementing the guidelines. ii. Parent perception of the interpersonal process of care (i.e., provider communication, collaborative decision making, and interpersonal style).

    iii. Parent perception of provider support for their child's healthy eating and exercise.

    b. Behavior outcomes include the following: i. Provider self-reported behaviors of identification and assessment of overweight, counseling on nutrition and physical activity, use of behavioral interventions, referrals, and cultural competency.

    ii. Documentation by chart review of body mass index (BMI) percentile for age and sex; appropriate diagnosis when BMI > 85th percentile; blood pressure (BP) percentile for age, height, and sex; and ordering appropriate laboratory tests when indicated.

  2. To explore the role of HIT in the processes of system change for implementation of the guidelines for prevention of obesity and related conditions, including the facilitators, barriers, and impact of the care model on change.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The prevalence of overweight youth nearly quadrupled in the past four decades. An alarming increase in the number of poor, underserved, overweight minority youth is reported. This dramatic increase in overweight youth has led to the emergence of associated co-morbidities such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders, respiratory conditions, and emotional problems in youth as well as increased risks of cardiovascular disease and cancer as adults. School-based health centers (SBHCs) provide access to primary care for many underserved and minority youth at risk for obesity and related chronic conditions. Primary care providers (PCPs), however, including those at SBHCs, face a number of barriers to addressing weight management in children. The rising prevalence of obesity and difficulty in identifying, assessing, and maintaining healthy weight in children and adolescents led national groups to convene expert panels that have published evidence-based guidelines. These guidelines include screening for cardiovascular risk factors and using a family-centered and culturally sensitive approach to care. The recommendations incorporate the use of motivational interviewing (MI) and the chronic care model to collaborate with families on a plan of care to improve children's health outcomes. The publication of recommendations or guidelines, however, traditionally has not changed provider behavior. Studies have shown widespread failure to follow established guidelines for a variety of conditions. The barriers to implementing guidelines include inadequate tools or resources, insufficient knowledge and skills, lack of self-efficacy, lack of time, and insufficient reimbursement. Health information technology (HIT) serves as a mechanism for providing decision support and tailored patient education materials to improve evidence-based care for the prevention of obesity and related conditions. Self-efficacy regarding obesity counseling has been linked to access to HIT. Other studies indicate that patients who received written health information with graphics that depicted their response to therapy improved their motivation to adhere to the treatment plan and were more satisfied with care. The proposed study is a comparative-effectiveness trial evaluating the impact of web-based provider training with and without HIT for provider decision support and tailored patient education. The goal is to translate into practice the current evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of obesity-related chronic conditions. HeartSmartKids™ is a decision-making tool that integrates patient health information with evidence-based guidelines and generates graphic trends of cardiovascular risks and tailored recommendations to improve patient outcomes. Elimination of health disparities in the chronic conditions related to childhood obesity depends upon the translation of best evidence into practice by the providers who care to youth at-risk for these obesity-related conditions. The unique features of this study are the SBHC setting; comparative effectiveness of web-based training on current evidence-based recommendations with and without HIT to support providers' decision making and tailored patient education; and the use of the Health Disparities Collaborative, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series quality improvement process, and the chronic care model for childhood obesity for training providers on the current guidelines.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
        • Recruiting
        • Arizona State University
        • Contact:
          • Danielle Dandreaux, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • School Based Health Centers who serve children 5-12 years
  • sees a minimum of 20 children per month for well-child care or sports physicals
  • has internet access and printer
  • has space for a small computer in the waiting room or check-in area
  • has a primary care provider who reads English.

Inclusion criteria for parents:

  • read English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • centers that have implemented the HeartSmartKids program.
  • children seen for immunizations, dental, or mental health care without a well-child visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Web-based Provider training
The training will include information about implementing the recommendations of the AMA, the pediatric metabolic working group, and the HEATSM guidelines into their practice setting through the use of the chronic care model for childhood obesity. Training will include self-management support, decision support, delivery-system redesign, clinical information systems, practice self-assessment, and staff development on obtaining, assessing, documenting BMI and BP; counseling families on appropriate interventions; and quality improvement processes to evaluate the practice's performance strategies.
The training will include information about implementing the recommendations of the AMA, the pediatric metabolic working group, and the HEATSM guidelines into their practice setting through the use of the chronic care model for childhood obesity. Training will include self-management support, decision support, delivery-system redesign, clinical information systems, practice self-assessment, and staff development on obtaining, assessing, documenting BMI and BP; counseling families on appropriate interventions; and quality improvement processes to evaluate the practice's performance strategies.
Active Comparator: HeartSmartKids with web-based training
The providers assigned to Group 2 will receive the web-based training described in the other arm, plus the HeartSmartKids™ (HSK) system. HSK is a bilingual, HIT kiosk system with clinical decision support and tailored patient education.
The training will include information about implementing the recommendations of the AMA, the pediatric metabolic working group, and the HEATSM guidelines into their practice setting through the use of the chronic care model for childhood obesity. Training will include self-management support, decision support, delivery-system redesign, clinical information systems, practice self-assessment, and staff development on obtaining, assessing, documenting BMI and BP; counseling families on appropriate interventions; and quality improvement processes to evaluate the practice's performance strategies.
The providers assigned to Group 2 will receive the web-based training described in the web-based training arm, plus the HeartSmartKids™ (HSK) system. HSK is a bilingual, HIT kiosk system with clinical decision support and tailored patient education.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Life Science Institute(ILSI)Research Foundation Assessment of Overweight in Children and Adolescents
Time Frame: every 9-12 months
The 35-item survey asks providers to rate themselves using a Likert-type scale on the following: (a) definitions of overweight in various age groups, (b) calculation and documentation of BMI percentile, (c) routine counseling on nutrition, physical activity, and screen time, (d) assessment of overweight children, and (e) resources and barriers that providers encounter in dealing with childhood overweight.
every 9-12 months
Chronic Care Model Elements Survey (CCMES)
Time Frame: every 9-12 months
A 9-item survey that assesses the extent to which elements of the chronic care model are used in the routine care of patients in a practice. It was originally designed for patients with diabetes and was adapted for use in overweight/obesity. The total score is created as the mean of the 9 items, with the higher indicative of greater use of the elements of the CCM.
every 9-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interpersonal Process of Care (IPC)
Time Frame: every 9-12 months
A 29-item survey available in English and Spanish. It is a 5-point Likert-type scale that measures the patient-clinician relationship, quality, and satisfaction with care on three domains: communication, decision making, and interpersonal style. Health disparities may be attributable to differences between minorities and their counterparts in the interpersonal processes between the patients and clinicians.
every 9-12 months
Health-Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ)
Time Frame: every 9-12 months
A measure with 6 items for eating and 6 items for regular exercise that assesses the degree of support from healthcare providers for healthy behaviors. The HCCQ for diet and exercise are scored by combining the items on each scale.
every 9-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bonnie M Gance-Cleveland, Ph.D., Arizona State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2011

Last Verified

January 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Childhood Obesity

Clinical Trials on Web-based Provider Training

3
Subscribe