BAX 326 (rFIX) Continuation Study

April 30, 2021 updated by: Baxalta now part of Shire

BAX 326 (Recombinant Factor IX): Evaluation of Safety, Immunogenicity, and Hemostatic Efficacy in Previously Treated Patients With Severe (FIX Level < 1%) or Moderately Severe (FIX Level <= 2%) Hemophilia B - A Continuation Study

The purpose of this BAX 326 Continuation Study is to further investigate incremental recovery over time, the hemostatic efficacy, the safety, immunogenicity, and health-related quality of life (HR QoL) of BAX 326 in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B who participated in BAX 326 pivotal study 250901 or BAX 326 pediatric study 251101.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rosario, Argentina, 2000
        • Instituto de Hematología y Medicina Clíncia Rubén Dávoli
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 040024-002
        • UNIFESP - Universidade Estadual de Sáo Paulo
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1233
        • Specialized Haematological Hospital "Joan Pavel"
      • Santiago, Chile
        • Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio
      • Bogotá, Colombia
        • Hospital De San Jose
      • Cali, Colombia
        • Centro Médico Imbanaco
      • Medellin, Colombia, 005543
        • Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe
      • Prague, Czechia, 150 06
        • Klinika detske hematologie a onkologie
      • New Delhi, India, 110002
        • Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospital
      • Dublin, Ireland, 8
        • St. James's Hospital, National Center for Hereditary Coagulation Disorders
      • Catania, Italy, 95124
        • University Hospital Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Hospital Ferrarotto Alessi
      • Florence, Italy, 50134
        • University Hospital Careggi, Agency of Hemophilia - Regional Reference Center for Inherited Bleeding
      • Foggia, Italy, 71100
        • University of Foggia Riuniti Hospital, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
      • Naples, Italy, 80144
        • Hospital San Giovanni Bosco, Center for Hemophilia and Thrombosis, Department of Hematology
      • Padova, Italy, 35128
        • Padova University Hospital, Medical Clinic II, Center for Hemophilia
      • Nara, Japan, 634-8251
        • Nara Medical University, Department of Pediatrics
      • Tokyo, Japan, 160-0023
        • Tokyo Medical University
      • Tokyo, Japan, 167-0035
        • Ogikubo Hospital
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80-952
        • Hematology and Transplantology Clinic, University Clinic Centre - Medical University Hospital
      • Krakow, Poland, 30-663
        • University Pediatric Hospital in Cracow
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-501
        • Medical College of the Jagiellonian University, Department of Hematology
      • Lodz, Poland, 93-510
        • Copernicus Hospital, Medical University in Lodz, Department of Hematology
      • Szczecin, Poland, 71-252
        • Professor Tadeusz Sokolowski Independent Public Teaching Hospital No. 1 of the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin
      • Warsaw, Poland, 00-579
        • Klinika Hematologii
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-776
        • Institute of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine
      • Bucharest, Romania, 11156
        • Prof. Dr. C.T. Nicolau National Institute for Transfusional Hematology
      • Timisoara, Romania
        • Louis Turcanu Emergency Clinical Children´s Hospital
      • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620149
        • Regional Clinical Hospital
      • Kirov, Russian Federation, 610027
        • Federal State Institution Kirov Hematology and Blood Transfusion Research Institute under the Federal Agency for High-Tech Medical Care
      • Krasnodar, Russian Federation, 350007
        • Pediatric Regional Clinical Hospital, Hematology Department
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125167
        • Hematology Research Center RAMS, Department of Reconstructive Orthopedics for Haemophilia Patients
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 195213
        • Republican Center for Hemophilia Treatment Outpatient Clinic No. 37
      • Malmö, Sweden, 205 02
        • Malmö University Hospital, Department of Coagulation Disorders
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
        • China Medical University Hospital
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 114
        • Tri-Service General Hospital
    • Taipei
      • Taipei City, Taipei, Taiwan, 110
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital
      • Lviv, Ukraine, 79044
        • State Institution "Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
        • Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia Centre and Haemostasis Unit, Royal Free Hospital
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9Wl
        • Manchester Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject and/or legal representative has/have voluntarily provided signed informed consent
  • Subject has completed Baxter clinical study 250901 (pivotal study) or Baxter clinical study 251101 (pediatric study)
  • Subject was 12 to 65 years old at the time of screening for Study 250901 or < 12 years old at the time of screening for Study 251101
  • Subject has severe (FIX level < 1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1-2%) hemophilia B (based on the one stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay), as tested at screening at the central laboratory
  • Subject has not developed an inhibitory FIX antibody during Baxter Pivotal Study 250901 or Pediatric Study 251101

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject received factor IX product(s) other than BAX 326 upon completion of Baxter Pivotal Study 250901 or Pediatric Study 251101
  • Subject has been diagnosed with an acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia B
  • For subjects transferring from Pivotal Study 250901: Subject's weight is < 35 kg or > 120 kg
  • Subject is planned to take part in any other clinical study, with the exception of BAX 326 Surgery study as described in this protocol, during the course of the Continuation Study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BAX 326
The treatment with BAX 326 will be at the discretion of the investigator and will consist of either twice weekly prophylactic treatment with 50 IU/kg, modified prophylaxis, or on-demand treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events Possibly or Probably Related to the Investigational Product
Time Frame: Assessed (based on patient diary) every 3 months until study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Possibly or probably related adverse events that occurred during or after first BAX326 infusion.
Assessed (based on patient diary) every 3 months until study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Number of Infusions Per Bleeding Episode Required Until Bleed Resolution
Time Frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Number of Infusions of BAX326 that were required until bleed resolution.
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Overall Hemostatic Efficacy Rating at Resolution of Bleed
Time Frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Overall clinical efficacy rating of bleeding episodes was done at resolution of bleed according these rating scale: Excellent=Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding after a single infusion. No additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusion would not affect the scoring. Good=Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. Fair=Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. None=No improvement or condition worsens.
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Annualized Bleed Rate During Prophylaxis Treatment
Time Frame: For prophylactic treatment the period from first to last prophylactic infusion is considered.
Annualized bleed rate (ABR) was calculated as (number of bleeding episodes/observed treatment period in days)*365.25
For prophylactic treatment the period from first to last prophylactic infusion is considered.
Consumption of BAX 326: Number of Infusions Per Month and Per Year
Time Frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
The number of infusions consumed per month and per year for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens.
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Consumption of BAX 326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Month and Per Year
Time Frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
The weight adjusted consumption of BAX 326 per month and per year for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens.
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Consumption of BAX326: Weight Adjusted Consumption Per Bleeding Episode
Time Frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
The weight adjusted consumption of BAX 326 per bleeding episode for the prophylactic and on-demand treatment regimens. Only infusions required until the resolution of bleed are considered.
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Development of Inhibitory and Total Binding Antibodies to Factor IX
Time Frame: Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.
Testing for inhibitory and total binding antibodies to Factor IX (FIX). Development during study means negative at screening and positive at any subsequent visit. Treatment emergent means more than 2-dilution increase as compared to the pre-study titer at screening.
Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.
Development of Antibodies to Chinese Hamster Ovary Proteins (CHO Proteins) and rFurin
Time Frame: Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.
Testing for antibodies to CHO proteins and rFurin. Development during study means negative at screening and positive at any subsequent visit. Treatment emergent means more than 2-dilution increase as compared to the pre-study titer at screening.
Laboratory assessment for immunology were done at screening, at exposure day 1, at week 4 (± 1 week), at month 3 (±1 week), thereafter, every 3 months (± 1 week) and at study completion/termination.
Occurrence of Severe Allergic Reactions and Thrombotic Events
Time Frame: Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
The occurrence of severe allergic reactions and thrombotic events was assessed.
Throughout the study from screening to study completion (when BAX326 is licensed in the respective country or the participant has accumulated approximately 100 exposure days to BAX 326, whichever is last).
Clinical Significant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters and Vital Signs
Time Frame: Measurements at screening and at study completion/termination are included in the analysis.
Hematology panel consists of complete blood count (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, leukocytes) with differential (ie, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils), mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and platelet count. Clinical chemistry panel consists of sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and glucose. Vital signs include body temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate, supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure. CS=clinically significant, NCS=not clinically significant. Change from Screening to End of Study is reported.
Measurements at screening and at study completion/termination are included in the analysis.
Pharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR) Over Time
Time Frame: IR over time was measured as Baseline and at Completion/Termination visit within 30 minutes pre-infusion and at 30 (± 5) minutes post-infusion.
PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Incremental recovery is calculated as IR30min = (C30min [IU/dL] - Cpre-infusion [IU/dL]) / dose per kg body weight [IU/kg] where C30min and Cpre-infusion relate to the unadjusted concentration values.
IR over time was measured as Baseline and at Completion/Termination visit within 30 minutes pre-infusion and at 30 (± 5) minutes post-infusion.
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)
Time Frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
After a wash out period of at least 5 days PK infusion with investigational product was administered. AUC 0-∞ is defined as AUC 0-t + Ct/lambda z, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration.
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Pharmacokinetics: Elimination Phase Half-life (T1/2)
Time Frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Elimination phase half-life is calculated as T1/2=log e (2) / lambda z where the elimination rate constant (lambda z) will be obtained by log e - linear fitting using least squares deviation to at least the last 3 quantifiable concentrations above pre-infusion level.
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Pharmacokinetics: Mean Residence Time (MRT)
Time Frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Mean residence time is calculated as total area under the moment curve divided by the total area under the curve. MRT=(AUMC0-∞[h2*IU/dL])/(AUC0-∞[h*IU/dL]) - TI/2 where AUMC0-∞ is determined in a similar manner as AUC0-∞ and TI represents infusion duration in hours.
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Pharmacokinetics: Systemic Clearance (CL)
Time Frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Systemic clearance is balculated as the dose in IU/kg divided by the total AUC. CL= Dose[IU/kg] / AUC0-∞[h*IU/dL]
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Pharmacokinetics: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
Time Frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Apparent steady state volume of distribution is calculated as Vss = CL * MRT CL=Systemic Clearance and MRT=Mean residence time
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours
Pharmacokinetics: Incremental Recovery (IR)
Time Frame: PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours.
PK infusion with investigational product was administered after a wash out period of at least 5 days. Incremental recovery is calculated as IR30min = (C30min [IU/dL] - Cpre-infusion [IU/dL]) / dose per kg body weight [IU/kg] where C30min and Cpre-infusion relate to the unadjusted concentration values.
PK assessments were done within 30 minutes pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 (± 5) minutes, 9 hours (± 30 minutes), 24 (± 2) hours, 48 (± 2) hours and 72 (± 2) hours.
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire SF-36
Time Frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item validated, generic HR QoL instrument suitable for participants of 17 years of age or older. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, mental health, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning) which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The mental health component summary score ranged from 19.5 to 64.2 with higher scores indicating less disability. The physical health component summary scores ranged from 18.6 to 59.6 with higher scores indicating less disability.
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life Using the Peds QL
Time Frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds QL) is a generic health related quality of life instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population and captures following domains: physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and school functioning. The Peds-QL total score consist of all 23 items of all domains. Score range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 44.6 to 98.9). The Peds-QL Physical Health Summary score consists of 8 items from the physical functioning domain. Score range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 40.6 to 100.0) The Psychosocial Health Summary score consists of 15 items from the emotional, social and school functioning domains. Score range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life (collected scores ranged from 46.7 to 100.0).
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire Haemo-QoL and Haem-A-QoL
Time Frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
The Hemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire (Haemo-QoL) and the Hemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-Qol) instruments have been developed and used in hemophilia A patients. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and outlook for the future. Haemo-QoL is used for participants aged 8 to 16 years and total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating low quality of life (collected scores ranged from 0.0 to 44.3) Haem-A-QoL is used for participants aged 17 years and older and total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating low quality of life (collected scores ranged from 4.9 to 76.8).
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) Based on Questionnaire EQ-5D and Pain Score.
Time Frame: Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.
The EQ-5D captures overall HR QoL (phyiscal, mental and social functioning). A health utility score can be calculated from this measure, adult and proxy versions available. EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS):Respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two endpoints (scale range from 0 to 100). Score 0 corresponds to the worst health you can imagine and score 100 corresponds to the best health you can imagine (collected scores ranged from 10-100). EQ-5D Total Index is based on general population valuation surveys. Responses to 5 questions are converted to an Index value and score range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Total Index was derived on US population (collected scores ranged from 0.4-1). General pain assessment (Pain score) is done through a visual analog scale (VAS), scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more pain (collected scores ranged 0-87).
Baseline at exposure day 1 and at study completion/termination.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemophilia B

Clinical Trials on BAX 326 (Recombinant factor IX)

Subscribe