A Phase III Study on the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Coagulation Factor VIIa (PERSEPT2)

A Phase III Study on the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Coagulation Factor VIIa (Recombinant) in Congenital Hemophilia A or B Pediatric Patients From Birth to <12 Years Old With Inhibitors to Factor VIII or IX: PerSept 2

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of 2 separate dose regimens (75µg/kg and 225 µg/kg) of Coagulation Factor VIIa (Recombinant) for the treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors to Factor VIII or IX in 12 patients ( birth to <6 years old), and 12 patients (≥6 years old to <12 years old).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A Phase III Study on the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Coagulation Factor VIIa (Recombinant) in Congenital Hemophilia A or B Pediatric Patients from birth to <12 years old with Inhibitors to Factor VIII or IX: PerSept 2

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveti Georgi"
      • Prague, Czechia
        • University Hospital Motol
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Hematology of Department Hemophilia and Thromboses center
      • Benoni, South Africa
        • Worthwhile Clinical Trials
      • Kyiv, Ukraine
        • National Specialized Children's Hospital OKHMATDYT, Centre for Hemostatic Pathology (Ukraine)
      • Lviv, Ukraine
        • Institute of blood pathology and transfusion medicine
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Denver Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73117
        • Jimmy Everest Center for Cancer and Bleeding Disorders
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas / Children's Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be male with a diagnosis of congenital hemophilia A or B of any severity
  • have one of the following:
  • a positive inhibitor test BU ≥5, OR
  • a Bethesda Unit (BU) <5 but expected to have a high anamnestic response to FVIII or FIX, as demonstrated from the patient's medical history, precluding the use of factor VIII or IX products to treat bleeding episodes, OR
  • a BU <5 but expected to be refractory to increased dosing of FVIII or FIX, as demonstrated from the patient's medical history, precluding the use of factor VIII or IX products to treat bleeding episodes
  • be aged from birth to <12 years old
  • have experienced at least 3 bleeding episodes of any severity in the past 6 months
  • parents or legal guardians must be capable of understanding and be willing to comply with the conditions of the protocol
  • parents or legal guardians must have read, understood, and provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have any coagulation disorder other than hemophilia A or B
  • be immunosuppressed (i.e., the patient may not be receiving systemic immunosuppressive medication; cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) counts at screening must be >200/µL)
  • have a known allergy or hypersensitivity to rabbits
  • have platelet count <100,000/mL
  • have had a major surgical procedure (e.g. orthopedic, abdominal) within 1 month prior to first administration of study drug
  • have received an investigational drug within 30 days of first study drug administration, or be expected to receive such drug during participation in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Coagulation Factor VIIa (Recombinant): 75 µg/kg
75 µg/kg treatment regimen for 3 months
A cross over design to assess the efficacy of 2 separate dose regimens (75 µg/kg and 225 µg/kg) of Coagulation Factor VIIa (Recombinant) for the treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors to Factor VIII or Factor IX
Active Comparator: Coagulation Factor VIIa (Recombinant): 225 µg/kg
225 µg/kg treatment regimen for 3 months
A cross over design to assess the efficacy of 2 separate dose regimens (75 µg/kg and 225 µg/kg) of Coagulation Factor VIIa (Recombinant) for the treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors to Factor VIII or Factor IX

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Successfully Treated Mild/Moderate Bleeding Episodes Per FDA Requirement.
Time Frame: 12 hours after first administration of study drug

For the primary efficacy endpoint, successful treatment of mild/moderate bleeding episode was defined as meeting all of the following:

  • "Good" or "excellent" response noted by the patient/parent/legal guardian or other caregiver, depending on patient's age and maturity
  • Study drug treatment: No further treatment with LR769 beyond timepoint where a "good" or "excellent" response for this bleeding episode was noted
  • No other hemostatic treatment needed for this bleeding episode
  • No administration of blood products that would indicate continuation of bleeding beyond timepoint where a "good" or "excellent" response for this bleeding episode was noted
  • No increase of pain beyond timepoint where a "good" or "excellent" response for this bleeding episode was noted that could not be explained other than as continuation of bleeding
12 hours after first administration of study drug
Proportion of Successfully Treated Bleeding Episodes (Mild/Moderate/Severe) Per EMA Definition
Time Frame: 12 hours after first administration of study drug
  • "Good" or "excellent" response noted by the patient/caregiver for mild/moderate bleeding episodes;
  • "Good" or "excellent" response noted by the physician for severe bleeding episodes.
12 hours after first administration of study drug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported "Good" or "Excellent" Response for Mild/Moderate Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: 12 hour after first administration of study drug

Based on Patient-Reported "Good" or "Excellent" responses as per the below descriptions:

Good: Symptoms of bleed (e.g., swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal hemorrhage) had largely been reduced by the treatment, but had not completely disappeared. Symptoms had improved enough to not require more infusions of the study drug.

Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleed (e.g., swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal hemorrhage). No additional infusion of study drug was required.

12 hour after first administration of study drug
Time to Patient Assessment of a "Good" or "Excellent" Response for Mild/Moderate Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of Bleeding Episode

Categories of Response to Treatment are Described as Follows:

None: No noticeable effect of the treatment on the bleed or worsening of patient's condition. Continuation of treatment with the study drug was needed.

Moderate: Some effect of the treatment on the bleed was noticed, e.g., pain decreased or bleeding signs improved, but bleed continued and required continued treatment with the study drug.

Good: Symptoms of bleed (e.g., swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal haemorrhage) had largely been reduced by the treatment, but had not completely disappeared. Symptoms had improved enough to not require more infusions of the study drug.

Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleed (e.g., swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal haemorrhage). No additional infusion of study drug was required.

Within 24 hours of Bleeding Episode
Number of Administrations of Study Drug Per Mild/Moderate Bleeding Episode
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of Bleeding Episode
The number of study drug administrations with non-missing dose information in order to treat one mild/moderate bleeding episode.
Within 24 hours of Bleeding Episode
Total Amount of Study Drug Administered Per Mild/Moderate Bleeding Episode
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of Bleeding Episode
The total amount of study drug administered in order to treat one mild/moderate bleeding episode.
Within 24 hours of Bleeding Episode

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mild/Moderate Bleeding Episodes With Successful Pain Relief
Time Frame: 12 hour after first administration of study drug
Successful pain relief was defined as a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS: 0-100; 0: no pain at all; 100: the worst pain ever possible) pain score at 12 hours after initial study drug administration that was less than the pain score at the start of treatment with study drug.
12 hour after first administration of study drug

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Wang, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemophilia A With Inhibitors

Clinical Trials on Coagulation FVIIa (Recombinant)

3
Subscribe