Ranolazine in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

February 20, 2020 updated by: Dr. Nicolas Shammas, Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Ranolazine in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients With Persistent Chest Pain or Dyspnea Despite Conventional Therapy: A Cross-Over Study

Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy may continue to experience persistent chest pain and shortness of breath despite conventional medical therapy and/or revascularization. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of taking Ranexa versus placebo in patients with ischemic (due to blockages) cardiomyopathy treated with optimal conventional medical therapy and/or percutaneous revascularization.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Iowa
      • Davenport, Iowa, United States, 52803
        • Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ischemic cardiomyopathy patients on optimal medical treatment. Optimal medical treatment is defined as the continued symptoms of chest pain or dyspnea despite treatment with 2 antiischemic agents (beta blockers, CCB or nitrates). Unless contraindicated, all cardiomyopathy patients should be treated with a beta blocker and an ACEI/ARB.
  2. Anginal chest pain or dyspnea
  3. Documentation of non treatable or optimally treated coronary artery disease
  4. Ejection Fraction of less than or equal to 40%

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Less than 18 years of age
  2. Pregnant or breast feeding
  3. Patients with non ischemic cardiomyopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ranolazine
1000 mg Ranexa orally once daily titrated as tolerated after 1 week up to taking 1000 mg twice daily.
1000 mg Ranexa orally once daily titrated as tolerated after 1 week up to taking 1000 mg twice daily.
Other Names:
  • Ranolazine
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
1000 mg placebo orally once daily titrated as tolerated after 1 week up to taking 1000 mg twice daily.
1000 mg placebo orally once daily titrated as tolerated after 1 week up to taking 1000 mg twice daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anginal Frequency
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Anginal frequency as assessed by Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Scoring is done by assessing responses on an ordinal value. Anginal score is scored by the patient by selecting a number from 0 to 100 with low score indicates more anginal frequency. The mean of the the scores of all patients analyzed were compared between placebo and Ranolazine.
12 weeks
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Quality of life as measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire as a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. The Qaulity of life is scored by the patient. It assesses the perceived satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the major domains of life.

These include mobility, self-care, Usual activities (leisure, work, family), Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety.

12 weeks
Dyspnea Assessed by the Rose Dyspnea Questionnaire (RDQ)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
RDQ is a four item questionnaire that evaluates a patient's dyspnea with regular activity. Each question answered postiviely is given a score of 1. Total score possible is 4. A higher score indicates worse dyspnea. A difference between the score at end of treatment minus baseline is performed. A negative score indicates improvement. Comparing the difference between the 2 arms (placebo and ranolazine) is performed.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas W Shammas, MD, Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chest Pain

Clinical Trials on Ranexa

3
Subscribe